Abstract
Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a pleiotropic neuropeptide considered to be a potent regulator of astrocytes. It has been reported that PACAP also affects astrocytoma cell properties, but the proliferative effects of this peptide in previous reports were inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to search for correlations between malignant potential, PACAP/PACAP receptor expression, and the proliferative potential of four astrocytoma cell lines (KNS-81, KINGS-1, SF-126, and YH-13). Immunohistochemical observations were performed using astrocyte lineage markers with a view to establishing malignant potential, which is inversely correlated to differentiation status in astrocytoma cells. YH-13 showed the most undifferentiated astrocyte-like status, and was immunopositive to a cancer stem cell marker, CD44. These observations suggest that YH-13 is the most malignant of the astrocytoma cell lines tested. Moreover, the strongest PAC1-R immunoreactivity was observed in YH-13 cells. Using real-time PCR analysis, no significant differences among cell lines were detected with respect to PACAP mRNA, but PAC1-R and VPAC1-R mRNA levels were significantly increased in YH-13 cells compared with the other cell lines. Furthermore, when cell lines were treated with PACAP (10−11 M) for 3 days, the YH-13 cell line, but not of the other cell lines, exhibited a significantly increased cell number. These results suggest that PACAP receptor expression is correlated with the malignant and proliferative potential of astrocytoma cell lines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Astrocytoma is a form of primary tumor arising from astrocytes. Glioblastoma multiforme, the most aggressive astrocytoma, usually occurs more frequently in the adult brain than in the spinal cord. Because of this tumor’s potential to grow quickly, the median survival time is only 12–15 months following diagnosis, even if the patient receives optimal medical treatment (Ahmed et al. 2014), keeping in mind that truly effective drugs have yet to be developed to treat high-grade astrocytomas. This is partly because our present understanding of the pathology of astrocytomas has limited the development of therapeutic interventions.
Pituitary adenylate-cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide that exists in 38- and 27-amino acid residue forms (Miyata et al. 1989, 1990). PACAP belongs to the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)/secretin/glucagon family, and its closest paralog is VIP. PACAP and VIP share three types of receptors (PAC1-R, VPAC1-R, and VPAC2R), with both PACAP and its receptors widely expressed throughout the brain (Arimura and Shioda 1995; Shioda 2000). PACAP has a pleiotropic role in the central nervous system, functioning as a neurotransmitter, neuroprotectant, and promoting factors for neural stem cell differentiation (Shioda et al. 2006; Watanabe et al. 2007; Ohtaki et al. 2008). Moreover, PACAP regulates astrocytes as well as neurons (Masmoudi-Kouki et al. 2007; Nakamachi et al. 2011a).
PACAP also affects glioma cells. Based on elevated cAMP levels, Robberecht et al. first suggested a role played by PACAP receptor expression in human glioma cells (Robberecht et al. 1994). Later, the effect of PACAP on the proliferation of astrocytoma cells was studied by several groups, but conflicting results were obtained (Vertongen et al. 1996; Dufes et al. 2003; Sokolowska and Nowak 2008; D'Amico et al. 2013). We believe that these differences were caused by variations in the malignancy levels of the astrocytoma cells used in the respective studies. As such, the purpose of the present study is to clarify the relation between astrocytoma malignancy and the proliferative effects of PACAP in vitro using a number of different ascytoma cell lines.
Materials and Methods
Human Astrocytoma Cell Lines
Four human astrocytoma cell lines (KNS-81, KINGS-1, SF-126, and YH-13) were obtained from the Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan). The KINGS-1 cell line was established from grade 3 astrocytoma tissue, while SF-126 and YH-13 were established from grade 4 astrocytoma tissue (or glioblastoma multiforme) according to the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system (Louis et al. 2007). The KNS-81 cell line was generated from astrocytoma tissue whose malignancy was not recorded.
Cell Culture
Stocks of the four cell lines were defrosted in a 37 °C water bath and then mixed with minimum essential medium (MEM) medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 20 % fetal bovine serum (FBS). After centrifugation at 1,500 rpm and 4 °C, the supernatant was removed, the pellet was dissolved in MEM medium with 20 % FBS and antibiotic-antimycotic agents (Invitrogen) and cells were incubated in a 5 % CO2/air incubator at 37 °C. When the incubated cells reached subconfluence, they were detached by treatment with trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen) for 5 min. The detached cells were collected and centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The pellet was suspended in the medium, and seeded on 100 mm culture dishes for passage, 60 mm dishes for immunocytochemistry, and 96-well plates for CyQUANT assay. Extra pellets were maintained at −80 °C for real-time PCR analysis.
Immunocytochemistry
Cultured cells were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 for 30 min at 4 °C. After washing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), the cells were incubated in 5 % normal horse serum with 0.25 % Triton X-100 in PBS for penetration and blocking. The cells were then incubated with primary antibody in blocking buffer for 18 h at 4 °C. The antibodies used were: rat anti-CD44 (1:1000; TONBO Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), mouse antiglia fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 1:500; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), mouse anti-A2B5 IgM (1:200, EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), mouse antiglutamate synthase (GS, 1:500, EMD Millipore Corporation), mouse antineuronal nuclei (NeuN, 1:1,000; EMD Millipore Corporation), rat antimyelin basic protein (MBP, 1:500; EMD Millipore Corporation), rat anti-CD11b (1:500; Serotec, Oxford, UK), or PAC1-R (Suzuki et al. 2003). After incubation with Alexa488-labeled secondary antibodies (Invitrogen), cells were treated for 10 min with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 1:10,000). After mounting with aqueous mounting medium on cover slips, the immunoreactivity of cells was measured with the aid of a fluorescence microscope (AXIO Imager Z1, Carl Zeiss, Germany). All of the above procedures were carried out on three cells from three independently prepared cultures.
Real-Time PCR Analysis
Total RNA was isolated by TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) from cell pellets prepared from each of the cell lines, and complementary DNA was generated by reverse-transcriptase (PrimeScript RT reagent kit, TaKaRa BIO INC., Kyoto, Japan). PCR primer sets for human PACAP, PAC1-R, VPAC1-R, VPAC2R, and GAPDH mRNA sequences are listed in Table 1. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II reagent (TaKaRa BIO INC) and an ABI PRISM 7900 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Lincoln, CA, USA). Relative gene expression was calculated using the comparative delta Ct method, and normalized with respect to the GAPDH housekeeping gene. The specificity of PCR products was confirmed by dissociation curve with a single peak at the final PCR step.
CyQUANT Assay
Astrocytoma cells were seeded at 100 cells/cm2 on 96-well plates and treated with human PACAP38 (final concentration 10−13 to 10−7 M in PBS) or PBS as control. After 3 days of treatment, the medium was removed and plates were stored at −80 °C. The number of cells was measured by CyQUANT kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Multiple comparisons were made by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparison tests. P values of less than 0.05 or less than 0.01 were considered to indicate statistical significance for all analyses.
Results
Characterization of Astrocytoma Cell Lines by Immunocytochemistry
We first checked the differentiation level of astrocytoma cells by immunostaining with astrocyte and glial progenitor markers given that malignant astrocytoma cell have been described to show an undifferentiated glial-like phenotype (Jellinger 1978; Piepmeier et al. 1993). Anti-GFAP (marker for mature astrocytes but not immature glial cells such as radial glia), anti-GS (marker for astrocytes and astrocytoma cells), and anti-A2B5 (glial progenitor cell marker) antibodies were used (Fig. 1). GFAP immunoreactivity was observed in the KNS-81 and KINGS-1 cell lines, but not in SF-126 or YH-13. On the other hand, GS immunoreactivity was detected in the KNS-81, KINGS-1, and SF-126 cell lines, but not in YH-13. In contrast, immunoreactivity to A2B5 was observed in SF-126 and YH-13, but not in KNS-81 and KINGS-1 cell lines. To confirm that these cells were derived from astrocytes, other cell markers, such as antibodies against NeuN (as a neuronal marker), MBP (as an oligodendrocyte marker), and CD11b (as a microglial marker) were also tested. Immunoreactivities against these antibodies were not observed in any of the cell lines (Fig. 2). CD44 is a receptor for hyaluronic acid and is used as a marker for cancer stem cells and as an indicator of high-invasive potential (Wiranowska et al. 2006; Anido et al. 2010). Only marginal CD44 immunoreactivity was observed in KNS-81 and KINGS-1 cells, but strong immunoreactivity was observed in SF-126 and YH-13 cells (Fig. 3). PAC1-R immunoreactivity was observed all cells, with the signal intensity increasing in the following order: KNS-81 < KINGS-1 < SF-126 < YH-13 (Fig. 3).
mRNA Levels of PACAP/PACAP Receptors in Astrocytoma
mRNA levels for PACAP and its receptor were measured in the four astrocytoma cell lines by real-time PCR analysis. While differences in ADCYAP1 (gene for PACAP) mRNA levels were not statistically significant between the cells lines (KINGS-1, 100 %; KNS-81, 82.1 %; SF-126, 111.3 %; and YH-13, 68.9 %) (Fig. 4a), large variations were seen for ADCYAP1R1 (gene for PAC1-R) mRNA levels, which in order of ranking were KINGS-1 < KNS-81 < SF-126 < YH-13, with normalized levels of 100, 130.3, 147.5, and 656.0 %, respectively. In this way, ADCYAP1R1 mRNA expression for the YH-13 cell line was significantly increased compared with the other astrocytoma cell lines (Fig. 4b). The VIPR1 mRNA level for YH-13 (4,720.3 %) was significantly higher than that for the other cell lines (KINGS-1, 100 %; KNS-81, 68.9 %; SF-126, 92.9 %) (Fig. 4c). VPAC2R mRNA was below the level of detection in all of the astrocytoma cell lines tested (data not shown).
CyQUANT Proliferation Assay
The effect of PACAP on the proliferative activity of the four astrocytoma cell lines was measured by CyQUANT assay. When employed at concentrations ranging from 10−13 to 10−7 M, PACAP did not affect the number of KNS-81, KINGS-1, or SF-126 cells in culture compared with the PBS control groups. However, for YH-13 cells in culture, treatment with 10−11 M PACAP significantly increased the number of cells compared with PBS treatment (Fig. 5) indicating a proliferative effect of PACAP on YH-13 cells at this concentration.
Discussion
This study was designed to compare the effects of PACAP and its receptor expression on the differentiation status of four human astrocytoma cell lines. GFAP is an intermediate filament protein that is expressed in mature astrocytes but not in immature glial cells such as radial glia (Pixley and de Vellis 1984). On the other hand, the A2B5 antibody binds to gangliosides and is used as glial progenitor marker (Fok-Seang and Miller 1992). Xia et al. (2003) suggested that astrocytoma cells share similar antigenicity with astrocytes, and that the A2B5-positive astrocytoma cells exhibited a higher recurrence rate than A2B5-negative astrocytoma. In our study, GFAP immunoreactivity was observed in KNS-81 and KINGS-1 cells, but not in SF126 or YH-13 cells. On the other hand, A2B5 immunoreactivity was observed in SF-126 and YH-13 cells, but not KNS-81 or KINGS-1 cells.
GS is a an enzyme that plays a key role in the metabolism of nitrogen. It is a commonly used marker for astrocytes and astrocytoma cells, where an inverse correlation between histological malignancy and degree of GS expression has been observed (Akimoto 1993; Anlauf and Derouiche 2013). Here, GS immunoreacitivty was observed in KNS-81, KINGS-1, and SF126 cells, but not in YH-13 cells (Fig. 1). Moreover, immunoreactivity for CD44, which is known as an astrocytoma stem cell marker, was weak in KINGS-1 cells, and stronger in SF-126 and YH-13 cells (Fig. 3). Taken together, these immunohistochemistry observations suggest that the malignancy of the astrocytoma cell lines used here (in the order of strength) is YH-13, followed by SF-126, KINGS-1, and KNS-81. These findings also imply that the malignant character of the original astrocytoma tissue used to prepare these cell lines was maintained. Immunoreactivity for other neuronal cell markers (NeuN, MBP, and CD11b) was not observed in the four cell lines (Fig. 2), indicating that they are cells from astrocytomas and not other types of brain tumor cells.
PACAP mRNA levels were not significantly different among the astrocytoma cell lines, but PAC1-R and VPAC1-R mRNA levels in YH-13 were significantly greater than the others (Fig. 4). Similary, strong PAC1-R immunoreactivity was also observed in YH-13 cells (Fig. 3). In consideration of the character of the astrocytoma cell lines, PAC1-R and VPAC1-R mRNA levels of cells with high-malignant potential were greater than those of low-malignant potential.
The results of the CyQUANT assay, a highly sensitive, fluorescence-based microplate assay for determining numbers of cultured cells (Jones et al. 2001), showed that PACAP, employed at a concentration of 10−11 M, stimulated an increase in the number of YH-13 cells compared with control PBS-treated cells, but this effect was not seen in the other cell lines (Fig. 5). These differences in sensitivity to PACAP seem to correlate with PAC1-R and VPAC1-R expression levels. As such, conflicting results from previous reports on the effects of PACAP on astrocytoma proliferation and malignancy (see “Introduction” section) may be explained in part by differences in the expression levels of PACAP receptors.
We previously reported that PAC1-R immunoreactivity was increased in reactive astrocytes induced by brain ischemia or spinal cord injury (Tsuchikawa et al. 2012; Nakamachi et al. 2013). PACAP treatment of cultured reactive astrocytes induced by scratch injury significantly increased the number of Ki67-positive proliferating cells in vitro (Nakamachi et al. 2011b). These data imply that malignant astrocytes and reactive astrocytes display similar characteristics, making it possible therefore to choose between low-malignant type astrocytoma cell lines (e.g., KNS-81) and high-malignant type cell lines (e.g., YH-13) as models of resting and reactive astrocytes, respectively.
It has also been reported that PACAP protects astrocytes against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis (Masmoudi-Kouki et al. 2011). Although the results in this study provide some information showing that PACAP increased the number of highly malignant astrocytoma cells, it remains unclear whether PACAP stimulates proliferation or survival. In addition, it is known that PACAP induces the differentiation of neural stem cells into astrocytes (Watanabe et al. 2007; Nakamachi et al. 2011a), implying that PACAP may influence differentiation status or, in other words, the malignancy level of astrocytoma cells. Further studies focusing on the function of PACAP on astrocytoma cells is therefore warranted.
In conclusion, we have shown here that PACAP receptor expression is correlated with malignant potential, and that this effect may underlie differences in PACAP sensitivity exhibited by astrocytoma cell lines. Further study on the effects of PACAP on astrocytoma cells could help to elucidate characteristics of malignant astrocytoma cells, on their high proliferative and invasive potential, and on their resistance to chemotherapy.
References
Ahmed R, Oborski MJ, Hwang M, Lieberman FS, Mountz JM (2014) Malignant gliomas: current perspectives in diagnosis, treatment, and early response assessment using advanced quantitative imaging methods. Cancer Manag Res 6:149–170
Akimoto J (1993) [Immunohistochemical study of glutamine synthetase expression in normal human brain and intracranial tumors]. No to shinkei = Brain and nerve 45:362–368
Anido J, Saez-Borderias A, Gonzalez-Junca A et al (2010) TGF-beta receptor inhibitors target the CD44(high)/Id1(high) glioma-initiating cell population in human glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 18:655–668
Anlauf E, Derouiche A (2013) Glutamine synthetase as an astrocytic marker: its cell type and vesicle localization. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4:144
Arimura A, Shioda S (1995) Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) and its receptors: neuroendocrine and endocrine interaction. Front Neuroendocrinol 16:53–88
D'Amico AG, Scuderi S, Saccone S, Castorina A, Drago F, D'Agata V (2013) Antiproliferative effects of PACAP and VIP in serum-starved glioma cells. J Mol Neurosci 51:503–513
Dufes C, Alleaume C, Montoni A, Olivier JC, Muller JM (2003) Effects of the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and related peptides on glioblastoma cell growth in vitro. J Mol Neurosci 21:91–102
Fok-Seang J, Miller RH (1992) Astrocyte precursors in neonatal rat spinal cord cultures. J Neurosci 12:2751–2764
Jellinger K (1978) Glioblastoma multiforme: morphology and biology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 42:5–32
Jones LJ, Gray M, Yue ST, Haugland RP, Singer VL (2001) Sensitive determination of cell number using the CyQUANT cell proliferation assay. J Immunol Methods 254:85–98
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 114:97–109
Masmoudi-Kouki O, Douiri S, Hamdi Y et al. (2011). Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide protects astroglial cells against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. J Neurochem 117(3):403–411. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07185.x
Masmoudi-Kouki O, Gandolfo P, Castel H et al (2007) Role of PACAP and VIP in astroglial functions. Peptides 28:1753–1760
Miyata A, Arimura A, Dahl RR et al (1989) Isolation of a novel 38 residue-hypothalamic polypeptide which stimulates adenylate cyclase in pituitary cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 164:567–574
Miyata A, Jiang L, Dahl RD et al (1990) Isolation of a neuropeptide corresponding to the N-terminal 27 residues of the pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide with 38 residues (PACAP38). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 170:643–648
Nakamachi T, Farkas J, Kagami N et al (2013) Expression and distribution of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide receptor in reactive astrocytes induced by global brain ischemia in mice. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 118:55–59
Nakamachi T, Farkas J, Watanabe J et al (2011a) Role of PACAP in neural stem/progenitor cell and astrocyte—from neural development to neural repair. Curr Pharm Des 17:973–984
Nakamachi T, Nakamura K, Oshida K et al (2011b) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) stimulates proliferation of reactive astrocytes in vitro. J Mol Neurosci 43:16–21
Ohtaki H, Nakamachi T, Dohi K, Shioda S (2008) Role of PACAP in ischemic neural death. J Mol Neurosci 36:16–25
Piepmeier JM, Fried I, Makuch R (1993) Low-grade astrocytomas may arise from different astrocyte lineages. Neurosurgery 33:627–632
Pixley SK, de Vellis J (1984) Transition between immature radial glia and mature astrocytes studied with a monoclonal antibody to vimentin. Brain Res 317:201–209
Robberecht P, Woussen-Colle MC, Vertongen P et al (1994) Expression of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptors in human glial cell tumors. Peptides 15:661–665
Shioda S (2000) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and its receptors in the brain. Kaibogaku Zasshi 75:487–507
Shioda S, Ohtaki H, Nakamachi T et al (2006) Pleiotropic functions of PACAP in the CNS: neuroprotection and neurodevelopment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1070:550–560
Sokolowska P, Nowak JZ (2008) Effects of PACAP and VIP on cAMP-generating system and proliferation of C6 glioma cells. J Mol Neurosci 36:286–291
Suzuki R, Arata S, Nakajo S, Ikenaka K, Kikuyama S, Shioda S (2003) Expression of the receptor for pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PAC1-R) in reactive astrocytes. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 115:10–20
Tsuchikawa D, Nakamachi T, Tsuchida M et al (2012) Neuroprotective effect of endogenous pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide on spinal cord injury. J Mol Neurosci 48:508–517
Vertongen P, Camby I, Darro F, Kiss R, Robberecht P (1996) VIP and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) have an antiproliferative effect on the T98G human glioblastoma cell line through interaction with VIP2 receptor. Neuropeptides 30:491–496
Watanabe J, Nakamachi T, Matsuno R et al (2007) Localization, characterization and function of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide during brain development. Peptides 28:1713–1719
Wiranowska M, Ladd S, Smith SR, Gottschall PE (2006) CD44 adhesion molecule and neuro-glial proteoglycan NG2 as invasive markers of glioma. Brain Cell Biol 35:159–172
Xia CL, Du ZW, Liu ZY, Huang Q, Chan WY (2003) A2B5 lineages of human astrocytic tumors and their recurrence. Int J Oncol 23:353–361
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI: 23249079, 24592681, and 24592680) and by the MEXT-Support Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Showa University (2012-16).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented at the 11th International Symposium on VIP, PACAP, and Related Peptides.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakamachi, T., Sugiyama, K., Watanabe, J. et al. Comparison of Expression and Proliferative Effect of Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP) and its Receptors on Human Astrocytoma Cell Lines. J Mol Neurosci 54, 388–394 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-014-0362-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-014-0362-z