Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postmortem CT findings of “gastromalacia”: a trap for the radiologist with forensic interest

  • CASE REPORT
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autolytic rupture of the stomach, so called gastromalacia, is a well recognized artifact at autopsy. A 50 year old Asian woman with a past history of alcoholism, head injury and posttraumatic epilepsy was found deceased at home following a 12 h period of feeling unwell, seizures and vomiting. Postmortem CT images of the abdomen showed free gas in the peritoneal cavity adjacent to the stomach and no other abnormality. There were no external or radiological features of putrefaction. Appearances were stated by a radiologist to be strongly suggestive of gastro-intestinal tract perforation. Autopsy revealed typical findings of autolytic gastric rupture without features of peritonitis. Cause of death was determined by the pathologist to be “complication of status epilepticus (posttraumatic)”. This case demonstrates that gastromalacia may occur rapidly after death and can be detected on postmortem CT, even in the absence of external putrefactive features or CT findings of putrefaction such as gas within the anterior abdominal wall, cardiac chambers or hepatic vasculature. The radiologist with forensic interest must be aware of this postmortem CT artifact in order to avoid ascribing the presence of free intra-peritoneal gas to antemortem perforation of the bowel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Fatteh A, editor. Handbook of forensic pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1973. p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saukko P, Knight B, editors. Knight’s forensic pathology. 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2004. p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter J. On the digestion of the stomach after death. Philos Trans R Soc London. 1772;62:447–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Donnell C, Rotman A, Collett S, Woodford N. Current status of routine post-mortem CT in Melbourne, Australia. Forensic Sci Med Path. 2007;3:226–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spitz WU, editor. Medico-legal investigation of death: guidelines for the application of pathology to crime investigation. 4th ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 2006. p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moritz AR. Classical mistakes in forensic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1956;26:1383–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS, Jaw TS, Wu MT, Liu GC. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT—correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology. 2007;242:472–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Furukawa A, Samoa M, Yamasaki M, Kino N, Tanaka T, Nitta N, Kawasaki S, Imoto K, Takahashi M, Murata K, Sakamoto T, Tani T. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:524–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeung KW, Chang MS, Hsiao CP, Huang JF. CT evaluation of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:329–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinto A, Scaglione M, Giovine S, Romano S, Lassandro F, Grassi R, Romano L. Comparison between the site of multislice CT signs of gastrointestinal perforation and the site of perforation detected at surgery in forty perforated patients. Radiol Med. 2004;108:208–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Christe A, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Vock P, Thali MJ. Abdominal trauma—sensitivity and specificity of postmortem non-contrast imaging findings compared with autopsy findings. J Trauma. 2009;66:1302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thali M, Yen K, Schweitzer W, Vock P, Ozdoba C, Dirnhofer R. Into the decomposed body—forensic digital autopsy using multislice—computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;134:109–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Atake S, Yamazaki K, Nakayama H. Cardiovascular gas on nontraumatic postmortem computed tomography (PMCT): the influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Radiat Med. 2005;23:225–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazaki K, Nakayama H, Watanabe K. Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) demonstration of the relation between gastrointestinal (GI) distension and hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG). Radiat Med. 2004;22:25–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Asamura H, Ito M, Takayanagi K, Kobayashi K, Ota M, Fukushima H. Hepatic portal venous gas on postmortem CT scan. Legal Med. 2005;7:326–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamazaki K, Shiotani S, Ohashi N, Doi M, Honda K. Hepatic portal venous gas and hyper—dense aortic wall as post-mortem computed tomography finding. Legal Med. 2003;5:S338–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackowski C, Sonnenschein M, Thali M, Aghayev E, Yen K, Dirnhofer R, et al. Intrahepatic gas at postmortem computed tomography: forensic experience as a potential guide for in vivo trauma imaging. J Trauma. 2007;62:979–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saukko P, Knight B, editors. Knight’s forensic pathology. 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2004. p. 64–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yamazaki K, Shiotani S, Ohashi N, Doi M, Kikuchi K, Nagata C, Honda K. Comparison between computed tomography (CT) and autopsy findings in cases of abdominal injury and disease. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;162:163–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, De Maertelaer V, Rubesova E, Capelluto E, Moschopoulos C. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1179–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Takabe K, Ohtani T, Muto I, Takano Y, Miyauchi T, Kato H, Sekido H, Ohki S, Hatakeyama K, Shimada H. Computed tomography (CT) findings of gastric rupture after blunt trauma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:901–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen CH, Huang HS, Yang CC, Yeh YH. Features of perforated peptic ulcers in conventional computed tomography. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1393–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. O’Donnell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Donnell, C.J., Baker, M.A. Postmortem CT findings of “gastromalacia”: a trap for the radiologist with forensic interest. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6, 293–297 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9160-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9160-2

Keywords

Navigation