Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Boric Acid and Sodium Pentaborate Pentahydrate-Treated Foreskin Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Liver Fibrosis

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a worldwide public health problem due to its life-threatening complications, including portal hypertension, liver failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver fibrosis is the net result of a complex excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM). Activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are the cause of deposition of ECM and are commonly recognized as a key step in liver fibrosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of foreskin-derived mesenchymal stem cells treated with boron compounds on liver fibrosis. Rats were injected intraperitoneally with thioacetamide (TAA) at a dose of 150 mg/kg except sham and control groups’ rats. Thioacetamide (TAA), foreskin-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TAA + FSDMSC), FSDMSC treated with boric acid (TAA + FSDMSC + BA), FSDMSC treated with sodium pentaborate pentahydrate (TAA + FSDMSC + NaB), control and sham groups were studied. Boron compound treated foreskin-derived mesenchymal stem cells were injected into the tail vein, and evaluations were conducted after 4 weeks and liver tissues were obtained for structural, immunohistochemical, and western blot studies and blood samples were taken for biochemical analysis. FSDMSC (BA) alleviates TAA-induced rats liver fibrosis, and BA showed a positive effect on foreskin-derived mesenchymal stem cells viability. After using BA-treated mesenchymal stem cells, we observed that there was regression in the fibrotic areas at TAA-induced liver fibrosis. The result demonstrates that the contribution of TAA + FSDMSC and TAA + FSDMSC (NaB) at the level of structure is not effective in regression of fibrosis in TAA-generated liver fibrosis. We concluded that FSDMSC treated with BA may be a factor in the regression of fibrosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Caligiuri A, Gentilini A, Pastore M, Stefano Gitto S, Marra F (2021) Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis regression. Cells 10:2759. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nia M-M, Wang Y-R, Wua W-W, Xia C-C, Zhang Y-H, Xu J, Xu T, Li J (2018) Novel Insights on Notch signaling pathways in liver fibrosis. Eur J Pharmacol 826:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lackner C, Tiniakos D (2019) Fibrosis and alcohol-related liver disease. J Hepatol 70:294–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parola M, Pinzani M (2019) Liver fibrosis: pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues. Mol Aspects Med 65:37–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinzani M, Rombouts K (2004) Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Digest Liver Dis 36:231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCuskey RS, Wisse E (2010) Hepatic sinusoidal cells: endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, stellate cells, and liver-associated lymphocytes. Comprehen Toxicol 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046884-6.01003-4

  7. Chilakapati J, Korrapati MC, Hill RA, Warbritton A, Latendresse JR, Mehendale HM (2007) Toxicokinetics and toxicity of thioacetamide sulfoxide: a metabolite of thioacetamide. Toxicology 230:105–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pritchard MT, Apte U (2015) Models to study liver regeneration. basic mechanisms, liver regeneration, relevant models and clinical applications, Apte U 15–40

  9. Pajarinen J, Lin T, Gibon E, Kohno Y, Maruyama M, Nathan K, Lu L, Yao Z, Goodman SB (2019) Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials 196:80–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. An SY, Jang YJ, Lim HJ, Han J, Lee J, Lee G, Park JY, Park SY, Kim JH, Do BR, Han C, Park HK, Kim OH, Song MJ, Kim SJ, Kim JH (2017) Milk fat globule-EGF factor 8, secreted by mesenchymal stem cells, protects against liver fibrosis in mice. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y, Zhao Y, Cheng Z, Zhan J, Sun X, Qian H, Zhu W, Xu W (2013) Mesenchymal stem cell-like cells from children foreskin inhibit the growth of SGC-7901 gastric cancer cells. Exp Mol Pathol 94:430–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doğan A, Demirci S, Bayir Y, Halici Z, Karakus E, Aydin A, Cadirci E, Albayrak A, Demirci E, Karaman A, Ayan AK, Gundogdu C, Şahin F (2014) Boron containing poly-(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng 44:246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilsanz C, Aller MA, Fuentes-Julian S, Prieto I, Blázquez-Martinez A, Argudo S, Fernández-Delgado J, Beleña J, Arias J, María P, De Miguel M (2017) Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells slow disease progression of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Biomed Pharmacotherapy 91:776–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.04.117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Demirci S, Doğan A, Şişli B, Sahin F (2014) Boron increases the cell viability of mesenchymal stem cells after long-term cryopreservation. Cryobiology 68:139–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ince S, Kucukkurt I, Cigerci IH, Fidan AF, Abdullah Eryavuz A (2010) The effects of dietary boric acid and borax supplementation on lipid peroxidation, antioxidant activity, and DNA damage in rats. J Trace Elem Med Biol 24:161–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bozkurt H, Bektasoglu PK, Borekci A, Ozturk OÇ, Kertmen H, Egilmez R, Mehmet Fatih Yuce F, Bora Gurer B (2018) Antifibrotic effect of boric acid in rats with epidural fibrosis. World Neurosurgery 122:989–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ince S, Keles H, Erdogan M, Hazman O, Kucukkurt I (2012) Protective effect of boric acid against carbon tetrachloride–induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Drug Chem Toxicol 35(3). https://doi.org/10.3109/01480545.2011.607825

  18. Sogut I, Oglakcı A, Kartkaya K, Ol KK, Sogut MS, Kanbak G, Inal ME (2015) Effect of boric acid on oxidative stress in rats with fetal alcohol syndrome. Exp Ther Med 9:1023–1027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pizzorno L (2015) Nothing boring about boron. Integr Med 14:4

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wallace MC, Hamesch K, Lunova M, Kim Y, Weiskirchen R, Strnad P, Friedman SL (2015) Standard operating procedures in experimental liver research: thioacetamide model in mice and rats. Lab Anim 49(S1):21–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X, Xu Y, Qi Y, Han X, Yin L, Xu L, Liu K, Peng J (2015) Potent effects of dioscin against thioacetamide- induced liver fibrosis through attenuating oxidative stress in turn inhibiting inflammation, TGF-β/Smad and MAPK signaling pathways. J Funct Foods 16:436–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buko VU, Lukivskaya OY, Naruta EE, Belonovskaya EB, Tauschel HD (2014) protective effects of norursodeoxycholic acid versus ursodeoxycholic acid on thioacetamide-induced rat liver fibrosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol 4:293–301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dogan A, Demirci S, Kıratlı B, Sahin F (2017) Cytoglobin: a potential marker for adipogenic differentiation in preadipocytes in vitro. Cytotechnology 69:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-016-0047-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lei Y, Qing-lan Wang Q, Shen L, Tao Y, Liu C (2019) MicroRNA-101 suppresses liver fibrosis by downregulating PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Clinics Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2019.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Beek JHDA, Moor MHM, Geus EJC, Lubke GH, Vink JM, Willemsen G, Boomsma DI (2013) The genetic architecture of liver enzyme levels: GGT, ALT and AST. Behav Genet 43:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9593-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun J, Wu Y, Long C, He P, Gu J, Yang L, Liang Y, Wang Y (2018) Anthocyanins isolated from blueberry ameliorates CCl4 induced liver fibrosis by modulation of oxidative stress, inflammation and stellate cell activation in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.07.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weng TC, Shen CC, Chiu YT, Lin YL, Huang YT (2012) Effects of armepavine against hepatic fibrosis induced by thioacetamide in rats. Phytother Res 26:344–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.3539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Nezaket Turkel Sesli for her close support in cell culture studies, Ilkay Dogan who evaluated the statistical data, and Pau Sancho-Bru and Mehmet Kahraman for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

This project with the number of TPF18009 was supported by the Aydın Adnan Menderes University. Part of this study was conducted at Yeditepe University, Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Istanbul.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept and design: Alpaslan Gokcimen, Fikrettin Sahin, and Guluna Erdem Koc. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Alpaslan Gokcimen, Fikrettin Sahin, and Guluna Erdem Koc. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Guluna Erdem Koc and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guluna Erdem Koc.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Animal Research

Ethical approval was obtained with Yeditepe University Experimental Animals Ethics Committee decision number 697 dated 14.08.2018.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erdem Koc, G., Gokcimen, A. & Sahin, F. The Effect of Boric Acid and Sodium Pentaborate Pentahydrate-Treated Foreskin Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Liver Fibrosis. Biol Trace Elem Res 201, 4834–4849 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-023-03565-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-023-03565-8

Keywords

Navigation