Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of Enzymatic Degreasing of Sheep Leather for an Efficient Approach and Leather Quality Improvement Using Fractional Experimental Design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leather industry is making significant contributions to economic development. However, it is notably leading to a serious environmental pollution. Recently, the enzyme technology developments offer new opportunities for enzymatic application in leather making. In the present investigation, microbial lipases were studied and used in degreasing process of sheep leathers. In order to optimize degreasing efficiency, a fractional experimental design with four parameters (enzyme source, processing stage, lipase amount, and degreasing duration) was used. Lipases A from Aspergillus niger, F from Rhizopus oryzae, R from Penicillium roqueforti, and AY from Candida rugosa were selected for leather degreasing. Enzymatic treatment of sheep skin was carried out during two stages of beamhouse operations: deliming-bating and pickling. Obtained results showed that enzymatic degreasing efficiency is higher than those obtained with the conventional process. Lipase F from Rhizopus oryzae demonstrated the most interesting hydrolysis with yields of 58.3% and 37.2% for delimed and pickled skins, respectively. An enzymatic degreasing process on pickled leather using 0.125% (w/v) of lipase F during 3.5 h is the most promising for an industrial application with a 76.03 of degreasing efficiency. Results of the physico-mechanical tests of leathers having undergone enzymatic treatment complied with industry requirement. The enzymatic treatment may be carried out in the same conditions as employed in leather manufacturing process. Results suggested that the enzymatic degreasing improves the leather quality and reduces the use of chemical compounds and surfactant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper.

References

  1. Saravanabhavan, S., Aravindhan, R., Thanikaivelan, P., Raghava Rao, J., Nair, B. U., & Ramasami, T. (2004). A source reduction approach: Integrated bio-based tanning methods and the role of enzymes in dehairing and fibre opening. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 7, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-004-0251-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anzani, C., Prandi, B., Buhler, S., Tedeschi, T., Baldinelli, C., Sorlini, G., Dossena, A., & Sforza, S. (2017). Towards environmentally friendly skin unhairing process: A comparison between enzymatic and oxidative methods and analysis of the protein fraction of the related wastewaters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1446–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mamo G, Mattiasson B. Alkaliphiles in biotechnology. Volume 172, Copyright 2020. Publisher: Springer International Publishing, Series ISSN 0724–6145.

  4. Lyu, B., Cheng, K., Ma, J., Hou, X., Gao, D., Gao, H., Zhang, J., & Qi, Y. (2017). A cleaning and efficient approach to improve wet-blue sheep leather quality by enzymatic degreasing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jia, L., Ma, J., Gao, D., Bin, L., & Zhang, J. (2016). Application of an amphoteric polymer for leather pickling to obtain a less total dissolved solids residual process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanagaraj, J., Kandukalpatti Chinnaraj, V., Babu, N., & Sayeed, S. (2006). Solid wastes generation in the leather industry and its utilization for cleaner environment. Cheminform, 37.https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200649273.

  7. Saran, S., Mahajan, R. V., Kaushik, R., Isar, J., & Saxena, R. K. (2013). Enzyme mediated beamhouse operations of leather industry: A needed step towards greener technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dettmer, A., Ayub, M. A. Z., & Gutterres, M. (2011). Hide unhairing and characterization of commercial enzymes used in leather manufacture. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28(03), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322011000300003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Choudhary, R.B., Jana, A.K., & Jha, M.K. (2004). Enzyme technology applications in leather processing. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, 11, 659–671. Corpus ID: 55644603.

  10. De Souza, F. R., & Gutterres, M. (2012). Application of enzymes in leather processing: A comparaison between chemical and coenzymatic processes. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 29, 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322012000300004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang, Z., Yong, Y., Zhang, J., Du, G., & Chen, J. (2017). Keratinolytic protease: A green biocatalyst for leather industry. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101, 7771–7779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8484-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, A. K., & Mukhopadhyay, M. (2012). Overview of fungal lipase: A review. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 166(2), 486–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9444-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pascoal, A., Estevinho, L. M., Martins, I. M., & Choupina, A. B. (2018). Novel sources and functions of microbial lipases and their role in infection mechanism. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 104, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.08.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasan, F., Ali Shah, A., & Hameed, A. (2006). Industrial applications of microbial lipases. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 39, 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Domínguez, A., Costas, M., Longo, M. A., & Sanromán, A. (2003). A novel application of solid state culture: Production of lipases by Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnology Letters, 25, 1225–1229. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025068205961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben Rejeb, I., Ben, H. J., & Gargouri, M. (2004). Coupled-enzyme system for the determination of lipase activity. Biotechnology Letters, 26, 1273–1276. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000044917.68640.c4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dayanandan, A., Hilda Vimala Rani, S., Shanmugavel, M., Gnanamani, A., & Suseela Rajakumar, G. (2013). Enhanced production of Aspergillus tamarii lipase for recovery of fat from tannery fleshings. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 44(4), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822013000400010.

  18. Vulliermet, A., Carré, M.C., Sanejouand, J. & Jullian C. (1982). Le dégraissage enzymatique des peaux de moutons. Dossier thématique : le dégraissage des peaux, Technicuir n°4: 64–76.

  19. ISO 4048:2018 [IULTCS/IUC 4] Leather - chemical tests - determination of matter soluble in dichloromethane and free fatty acid content.

  20. IUP 6 (2000). Measurement of tensile strength and percentage elongation. Journal Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists, 84, 317–321.

  21. IUP 8. (2000). Measurement of tear load. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists and Chemists, 84, 327–329.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mehran, M., & Filsoof, M. (1976). Fatty Acid Composition of Sheep Tail-Fats from Five Iranian Native Breeds. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 78(5), 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/lipi.19760780502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandan, R. C., Khan, I. M., & Shahani, K. M. (1976) Bovine pancreatic lipase. III. Lipolysisof oils and fats and fatty acid specificity. Journal of Dairy Science, 59, 847-853. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84286-5

  24. Hiol, A., Jonzo, M. D., Rugani, N., Druet, D., Sarda, L., & Comeau, L. C. (2000). Purificationand characterization of an extracellular lipase from a thermophilic Rhizopus oryzae strainisolated from palm fruit. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 26, 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00173-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Waters, P. J., & Price, S. M. (1991). Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists andChemists, 75, 197.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mrozik, A., Hupert-Kocurek, K., Nowak, B., & Labużek, S. (2008). Microbial lipases and theirsignificance in the protection of the environment (Review). Postępy Mikrobiol, 47(1), 43–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rasmussen, L., Xu, Q, Pedersen, N. K., & Zhou, Z. (2009). An Enzymatic treatment of skinand hide degreasing, EP 2132299 B1.

  28. Saxena, S. (2015). Applied microbiology. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. ISO 3376:2011 [IULTCS/IUP 6], Cuir - Essais physiques et mécaniques - Détermination dela résistance à la traction et du pourcentage d'allongement.

  30. ISO 3377-2:2016 [IULTCS/IUP 8], Cuir - Essais physiques et mécaniques - Déterminationde la force de déchirement - Partie 2: Déchirement des deux bords.

  31. ISO 23910:2019 [IULTCS/IUP 44], Leather - Physical and mechanical tests - Measurementof stitch tear resistance.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work was designed and coordinated by Ines Ben Rejeb, Haifa Khemir, and Mohamed Gargouri. Ines Ben Rejeb, Neila Miled, and Yosra Messaoudi performed the experiments and analyzed the data. The manuscript was written and commented by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ines Ben Rejeb.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The present article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Therefore, no formal consent is required.

Consent to Participate

All authors have given consent to participate.

Consent for Publication

All authors have given approval of the manuscript to be published.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 327 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben Rejeb, I., Khemir, H., Messaoudi, Y. et al. Optimization of Enzymatic Degreasing of Sheep Leather for an Efficient Approach and Leather Quality Improvement Using Fractional Experimental Design. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 194, 2251–2268 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03769-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03769-5

Keywords

Navigation