Skip to main content
Log in

Study of user behaviour after eco-use feedback: the Green-Use Learning Cycle (GULC) as a new strategy for product eco-design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The way users interact with systems requiring energy largely conditions their global environmental impact. Informing of the environmental consequences of usage of products/systems can generate increased awareness of its connection to environmental impacts, encouraging a change in user behaviour and resulting in products’ global environmental impact. Various levels of product modification have been proposed, from simple information, through behaviour steering and persuasive technology. We focus on eco-feedback and distinguish three different modalities: neutral, positive and negative. Based on the conclusions of an experiment observing the consumption of paper towels, this article demonstrates: (1) An individual’s general level of information about the environment has an influence on the effectiveness of the eco-feedback modality. (2) The effectiveness of a modality of eco-feedback diminishes over time. The potential of iterative user feedback combined with intelligent sensor embedded systems led to our defining the Green Use Learning Cycle as an innovative concept for eco-design. It underlines that products should be designed so that they can give feedback to users about the environmental performances of their usage (user adapts to product), and can analyse the dominant parameters of usage to be configured automatically to the environmental optimum throughout the life cycle (product adapts to user).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhamra, T.A., Lilley, D., Tang, T.: Sustainable use: changing consumer behavior through product design. In: Changing the change: design visions, proposals and tools. Turin, Italy July 10–12 linebreak(2008)

  2. Chapotot, E.: Proposal of a Usage Lifecycle Management (ULM) approach to capitaliza the uses and favor the generation of innovative concepts of products and services (in French). PhD thesis, Universitè Bordeaux 1 (2009)

  3. Chapotot, E., Abi Akle, A., Minel, S., Yannou, B.: Comparative study of theoretical and real uses of eco-designed laundry detergents. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen August 15–18 (2011)

  4. Devanathan, S., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Ramani, K.: Integration of sustainability into early design through the function impact matrix. J. Mech. Des. ASME 132, 081004-1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ford Motor Company FORD. Ford tests show eco-driving can improve fuel economy by an average of 24 percent, August 27 (2008)

  6. International Transport Forum. Workshop on ecodriving: findings and messages for policy makers. Forum, November 22–23 linebreak(2007)

  7. Greene, D.: Driver energy conservation awareness training: review & recommendations for a national, program (ornl/tm-9897) linebreak(1985)

  8. Harper, S.R., Thruston, D.L.: Incorporating environmental impacts in strategic redesign of an engineered system. J. Mech. Des. ASME 130(3), 031101 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lilley, D.: Designing for behavioral change: reducing the socials impacts of product use through design. PhD thesis, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University, UK (2007)

  10. Lilley, D.: Sustainable design education considering design for behavioural change. J. High. Educ. Acad. Eng. Subject Centre 4(1), (2009)

  11. MEEDDM. The display of environmental caracteristics of products: a grenelle environement major challenge in terms of sustainable consumption (in French). Technical report, Ministère de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Développement Durable et de la Mer. Commisariat General au Développement Durable, January (2010) ISSN : 2100–1634

  12. Millet, D., Bistagnino, L., Lanzavecchia, C., Camous, R.: Can the industry contribute to sustainable development? paradigm change and learning macro-process (in French). Nat. Sci. et Sociétés (NSS) 11(2), 146–157 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Millet, D., Camous, R., Bistagnino, L., Aoussat, A.: Sustainable development, innovation, and value (inFrench). La Valeur 1(90), 15–20 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Millet, D., Camous, R., Bistagnino, L., Aoussat, A.: Environnemental knowledge creation and management process: formalisation, diffusion ans valorisation model. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. 2, (2002)

  15. Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, pp. 118–140, New York (2002)

  16. Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Hanwerker, C., Choi, J.-K., Kim, H., Thruston, D.: Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a review. J. Mech. Des. ASME 132, 091004-1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmalz, J., Boks, C.: Simultaneous application of design for sustainable behavior and linked benefit strategies in practice. In: Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing. Springer, Berlin (2011)

  18. Serna-Mansoux, L., Millet, D., Chapotot, E., Minel, S.: For a sustainable dialogue: the Green-Use Learning Cycles (GULC) Concept. In: 11th Biennal Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, ESDA July 2–4 2012 (2012)

  19. Simon, F., Bedeau, L.: Study on the opportunity of the sorting and recycling of plastic domestic packaging different from bottles and flasks, behaviour component on the information, perception and expectations of consumers-sorters (in French). Technical report, TNS SOFRES, eco-emballage ADEME, (2009)

  20. Tang, T., Bhamra, T.: Changing energy consumption behaviour through sustainable product design. In: International Design Conference Design 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia May 19–22 (2008)

  21. Wever, E., Van Kujik, J., Boks, C.: User-centred design for sustainbale behavior. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 1(1), 9–20 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yannou, B., Chen, W., Wang, J., Hoyle, C., Drayer, M., Rianantsoa, N., Alizon, F., Mathieu, J.P.: Usage coverage model for choice modeling: Principles. In International Design Engineering Conferences/Design Automation Conference, IDETC/DAC: ASME, San Diego, CA , USA (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Iker Aguirre for his active participation in the behavioural study and the statistical analysis of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Livier Serna-Mansoux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serna-Mansoux, L., Chapotot, E., Millet, D. et al. Study of user behaviour after eco-use feedback: the Green-Use Learning Cycle (GULC) as a new strategy for product eco-design. Int J Interact Des Manuf 8, 43–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-013-0192-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-013-0192-1

Keywords

Navigation