Skip to main content
Log in

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Gout Diagnosis and Management

  • CRYSTAL ARTHRITIS (MH PILLINGER, SECTION EDITOR)
  • Published:
Current Rheumatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The central feature of gout is deposition of monosodium urate crystals. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is a recently developed advanced imaging method that enables visualisation of urate deposits by analysis of the chemical composition of the scanned materials. This review summarises recent research describing the use of DECT in gout management. This technology may assist in both diagnosis and monitoring of the disease. Studies of patients with established disease indicate diagnostic accuracy for gout is high. Excellent inter-reader agreement has been reported for detection of urate deposits by use of DECT. Automated volume assessment software also enables rapid and reproducible measurement of urate deposits within tophi, suggesting that this modality may be useful for monitoring the disease. Although several case reports indicate DECT can be used to reveal reduction in the size of urate deposits, the sensitivity to change in response to urate-lowering therapy has not yet been systematically reported. DECT images reveal variable urate deposition within tophi of the same physical size. The ability to visualise urate deposits in tissue may provide new insights into the pathology and mechanisms of gout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Loeb JN. The influence of temperature on the solubility of monosodium urate. Arthritis Rheum. 1972;15(2):189–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dalbeth N, Pool B, Gamble GD, Smith T, Callon KE, McQueen FM, et al. Cellular characterization of the gouty tophus a quantitative analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(5):1549–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, Pascual E, Barskova V, Conaghan P, et al. Eular evidence based recommendations for gout. Part ii: management. Report of a task force of the eular standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (escisit). Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(10):1312–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shoji A, Yamanaka H, Kamatani N. A retrospective study of the relationship between serum urate level and recurrent attacks of gouty arthritis: evidence for reduction of recurrent gouty arthritis with antihyperuricemic therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(3):321–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perez-Ruiz F, Calabozo M, Pijoan JI, Herrero-Beites AM, Ruibal A. Effect of urate-lowering therapy on the velocity of size reduction of tophi in chronic gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47(4):356–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolaou S, Yong-Hing CJ, Galea-Soler S, Hou DJ, Louis L, Munk P. Dual-energy ct as a potential new diagnostic tool in the management of gout in the acute setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):1072–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, Dzyubak OP, Lieske JC, Jackson ME, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy ct. Acad Radiol. 2007;14(12):1441–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M, Staehler M, Haseke N, Nikolaou K, et al. Dual energy ct characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(2):112–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Manglaviti G, Tresoldi S, Guerrer CS, Di Leo G, Montanari E, Sardanelli F, et al. In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy ct. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(1):W76–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas C, Heuschmid M, Schilling D, Ketelsen D, Tsiflikas I, Stenzl A, et al. Urinary calculi composed of uric acid, cystine, and mineral salts: differentiation with dual-energy ct at a radiation dose comparable to that of intravenous pyelography. Radiology. 2010;257(2):402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson TR, Weckbach S, Kellner H, Reiser MF, Becker CR. Clinical image: dual-energy computed tomographic molecular imaging of gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(8):2809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. • Choi HK, Al-Arfaj AM, Eftekhari A, Munk PL, Shojania K, Reid G, et al. Dual energy computed tomography in tophaceous gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(10):1609–12. The first study of DECT in patients with gout, demonstrating that DECT can detect a large number of urate deposits that are not apparent on clinical assessment. Excellent sensitivity and specificity was also reported for tophaceous gout.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(7):1116–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grassi W, Meenagh G, Pascual E, Filippucci E. “Crystal clear”-sonographic assessment of gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;36(3):197–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. • Glazebrook KN, Guimaraes LS, Murthy NS, Black DF, Bongartz T, Manek NJ, et al. Identification of intraarticular and periarticular uric acid crystals with dual-energy ct: initial evaluation. Radiology. 2011;261(2):516–24. A retrospective study examining the use of DECT for gout diagnosis, reporting excellent sensitivity and inter-reader agreement.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Choi HK, Burns LC, Shojania K, Koenig N, Reid G, Abufayyah M et al. Dual energy ct in gout: a prospective validation study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(9):1466–71. A prospective study of DECT for gout diagnosis and monitoring, reporting high specificity for gout, and excellent inter-reader reproducibility for DECT measurement of urate volumes.

  17. Parikh P, Butendieck R, Kransdorf M, Calamia K. Detection of lumbar facet joint gouty arthritis using dual-energy computed tomography. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(10):2190–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Desai MA, Peterson JJ, Garner HW, Kransdorf MJ. Clinical utility of dual-energy ct for evaluation of tophaceous gout. Radiographics. 2011;31(5):1365–75. discussion 76–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. • Manger B, Lell M, Wacker J, Schett G, Rech J. Detection of periarticular urate deposits with dual energy ct in patients with acute gouty arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(3):470–2. A small study of use of DECT for patients with acute gout, showing that 11/14 patients with acute gout had DECT urate deposits. However, for the four patients presenting with first gout attack, only two had urate deposits present on DECT, raising the possibility that sensitivity may be lower than previously reported for early disease.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Glazebrook KN, Kakar S, Ida CM, Laurini JA, Moder KG, Leng S. False-negative dual-energy computed tomography in a patient with acute gout. J Clin Rheumatol. 2012;18(3):138–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dalbeth N, Schauer C, Macdonald P, Perez-Ruiz F, Schumacher HR, Hamburger S, et al. Methods of tophus assessment in clinical trials of chronic gout: a systematic literature review and pictorial reference guide. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(4):597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dalbeth N, McQueen FM, Singh JA, MacDonald PA, Edwards NL, Schumacher Jr HR, et al. Tophus measurement as an outcome measure for clinical trials of chronic gout: progress and research priorities. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(7):1458–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. • Dalbeth N, Aati O, Gao A, House M, Liu Q, Horne A, et al. Assessment of tophus size: a comparison between physical measurement methods and dual-energy computed tomography scanning. J Clin Rheumatol. 2012;18(1):23–7. A prospective study comparing physical measurement of tophi with DECT measurement of urate volume. DECT reproducibility was higher than that of physical measurement. Analysis of the DECT images also revealed variable deposition of urate within tophi of similar sizes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bacani AK, McCollough CH, Glazebrook KN, Bond JR, Michet CJ, Milks J, et al. Dual energy computed tomography for quantification of tissue urate deposits in tophaceous gout: help from modern physics in the management of an ancient disease. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(1):235–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dalbeth N, Clark B, Gregory K, Gamble G, Sheehan T, Doyle A, et al. Mechanisms of bone erosion in gout: a quantitative analysis using plain radiography and computed tomography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(8):1290–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dalbeth N, Milligan A, Doyle AJ, Clark B, McQueen FM. Characterisation of new bone formation in gout: a quantitative site-by-site analysis using plain radiography and computed tomography. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(4):R165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr Dalbeth has served as a consultant for Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ardea Biosciences, and Metabolex; has received grant support from Fonterra; and holds patents on milk products for gout with support from Fonterra. Dr Choi has served as a consultant for Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Novartis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Dalbeth.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Crystal Arthritis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalbeth, N., Choi, H.K. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Gout Diagnosis and Management. Curr Rheumatol Rep 15, 301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-012-0301-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-012-0301-3

Keywords

Navigation