Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics of research on survivors of trauma

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Essential elements of all research include balance of risks and benefits, unbiased selection of research samples, and assurance of the rights of individual participants. This paper highlights some key ethical issues and summarizes recent evidence relating to participation in, and conduct of, trauma-focused studies with special reference to vulnerable populations (eg, women and children, refugees, survivors of human rights violations, and survivors of trauma in the developing world). A concise ethical framework, rather than rigid guidelines (that may not be applicable to all trauma studies), may be a more useful point of reference for investigators and ethics committees or institutional review boards. Despite the increased empiric data available to inform ethical dilemmas regarding trauma research, more cost-burden analysis research in varying trauma populations and careful investigation of factors that contribute to risk and benefit is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS): International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies. Geneva: CIOMS; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beyrer C, Kass NE: Human rights, politics, and reviews of research ethics. Lancet 2002, 360:246–251. This is a comprehensive review of ethical issues inherent in survivors of human rights violations and provides guidelines for conducting research in difficult political contexts.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Medical Research Council of South Africa: Guidelines on Ethics for Medical Research: General Principles Including Research on Children, Vulnerable Groups, International Collaboration and Epidemiology. Cape Town, South Africa: Medical Research Council; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellsberg M, Heise L: Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research. Lancet 2002, 359:1599–1604. This article discusses the challenges of applying ethical principles to research on domestic violence and provides guidance on how to minimize risks to participants.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffin MG, Resick PA, Waldrop AE, et al.: Participation in trauma research: is there evidence of harm? J Trauma Stress 2003, 16:221–227. This study provides very useful empirical data on participant reactions to different trauma assessment procedures in domestic violence (n=260), rape (n=108), and physical assault (n=62) samples. Results indicated that participation was very well tolerated by the vast majority of the trauma survivors.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levy P: The Drowned and the Saved. New York: Vintage International; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson AS, Jorm AF: Do mental health surveys disturb? Psychol Med 1990, 20:721–724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jorm AF, Henderson AS, Scott R, et al.: Do mental health surveys disturb? Further evidence. Psychol Med 1994, 24:233–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turnbull JE, McLeod JD, Callahan JM, et al.: Who should ask? Ethical interviewing in psychiatric epidemiology studies. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1988, 58:228–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman E, Walker EA, Gefland A: Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1999, 21:187–196. This study provides a detailed assessment of participant reactions in women who completed a trauma-focused survey and provides insights on ethical issues surrounding participation in traumatic stress studies.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Willebrand M, Wikehult B, Ekselius L: Acceptance of a traumafocused survey: do personality and health matter? Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2004, 26:70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shalev AY, Freedman S, Peri T, et al.: Prospective study of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma. Am J Psychiatry 1998, 155:630–637.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruzek JI, Zatzick DF: Ethical considerations in research participation among acutely injured trauma survivors: an empirical investigation. Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000, 22:27–36. This is the first empiric investigation of responses to participation and ethical considerations in a sample of acutely traumatized adults.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta & Co. Ltd.; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zungu-Dirwayi N, Kaminer D, Mbanga I, et al.: The psychiatric sequelae of human rights violations: a challenge for primary care. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004, 192:255–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaminer D, Stein DJ, Mbanga I, et al.: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa: relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights abuses. Br J Pychiatry 2001, 178:373–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein DJ, Herman A, Kaminer D, et al.: Ethical aspects of research on psychological trauma. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 2000, 2:31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leaning J: Ethics of research in refugee populations. Lancet 2001, 357:1432–1433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson LE, Benight CC: Effects of trauma-focused research on recent domestic violence survivors. J Trauma Stress 2003, 16:567–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization: Protocol for WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence. Geneva: WHO; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization: Putting Women’s Safety First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence Against Women. Geneva: Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy, WHO; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reich W, Kaplan L: The effects of psychiatric and psychosocial interviews on children. Compr Psychiatry 1994, 35:50–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kassam-Adams N, Newman E: The reactions to research participation questionnaires for children and for parents (RRPQ-C and RRPQ-P). Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2002, 24:336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McQuaid D, Barton J, Campbell E: Researchers BEWARE! Attrition and nonparticpation at large. J Burn Care Rehabil 2003, 24:203–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vitiello B, Jensen PS, Hoagwood K: Integrating science and ethics in child and adolescent psychiatry research. Biol Psychiatry 1999, 46:1044–1049.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ondrusek N, Abramovitch R, Pencharz P, et al.: Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research. J Med Ethics 1998, 24:158–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Paul M, Foreman DM, Kent L: Out-patient clinic attendance consent from children and young people-ethical aspects and practical considerations. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000, 5:203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dyregrov K, Dyregrov A, Raundalen M: Refugee families’ experience of research participation. J Trauma Stress 2000, 13:413–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Frank E, Novick DM, Kupfer DJ: Beyond the question of placebo controls: ethical issues in psychopharmacological drug studies. Psychopharmacology 2003, 171:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Calman K: Conducting research in developing countries. Drug Discov Today 2002, 7:1155–1159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spitzer R: Are Clinicians Still Necessary? Psychotherapy Research: Where Are We Going and Where Should We Go? New York: Guilford Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anthony JC, Folstein M, Romanoski AJ, et al.: Comparison of the lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985, 42:667–675.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Helzer JE, Robins LN, McEvoy LT, et al.: A comparison of clinical and Diagnostic interview Schedule diagnoses: physicians reexamination of lay-interviewed cases in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985, 42:657–666.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wing J, Henderson A, Winkel M: The rating of symptoms by a psychiatrist and a non-psychiatrist: A study of patients referred from general practice. Psychol Med 1977, 7:713–715.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dohrenwend B, Shrout P: Toward the development of a two stage procedure for case identification and classification in psychiatric epidemiology. In Research in Community and Mental Health, vol 2. Edited by Simmens R. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Research Council Unit on Anxiety and Stress Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of Stellenbosch, PO Box 19063, 7505, Cape Town, Tygerberg, South Africa

    Soraya Seedat MBChB, FCPsych, MMed (Psych)

Authors
  1. Soraya Seedat MBChB, FCPsych, MMed (Psych)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Willem P. Pienaar MD, MPhil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Williams PhD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel J. Stein MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seedat, S., Pienaar, W.P., Williams, D. et al. Ethics of research on survivors of trauma. Curr Psychiatry Rep 6, 262–267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-004-0075-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-004-0075-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation