Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation therapy in the management of locally advanced prostate cancer

  • Published:
Current Prostate Reports

Abstract

Locally advanced prostate cancer generally refers to those patients with clinical stages T3-4 disease. Patients with locally advanced cancer frequently are included in clinical trials that examine treatment for patients at high risk for relapse based on presenting prostate-specific antigen, high Gleason score, or advanced clinical stage. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that men with localized prostate cancer benefit from high-dose radiation therapy delivered with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, or proton beam therapy. Most importantly, neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy have significantly improved outcomes in men with locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer. Although questions remain regarding the optimal timing and duration of adjuvant hormonal therapy, a combination of long-term androgen deprivation started before radiation therapy and continued for 2 years represents a North American standard of care for this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al.: Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998, 280:969–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al.: Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 41:491–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roach M 3rd, Lu J, Pilepich MV, et al.: Long-term survival after radiotherapy alone: radiation therapy oncology group prostate cancer trials. J Urol 1999, 161:864–868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zagars GK, Pollack A, Smith LG: Conventional externalbeam radiation therapy alone or with androgen ablation for clinical stage-III (T3, NX/N0, M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 44:809–819.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perez CA, Walz BJ, Zivnuska FR, et al.: Irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate localized to the pelvis: analysis of tumor response and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1980, 6:555–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanks GE, Martz KL, Diamond JJ: The effect of dose on local control of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988, 15:1299–1305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Valicenti R, Lu J, Pilepich M, et al.: Survival advantage from higher-dose radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer treated on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:2740–2746.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smit WG, Helle PA, van PuttenWL, et al.: Late radiation damage in prostate cancer patients treated by high-dose external radiotherapy in relation to rectal dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990, 18:23–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanks GE, Lee WR, Hanlon AL, et al.: Conformal technique dose escalation for prostate cancer: biochemical evidence of improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or = 10 NG/ML. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996, 35:861–868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandler HM, McLaughlin PW, Ten HakenRK, et al.: Threedimensional conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: low risk of chronic rectal morbidity observed in a large series of patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 33:797–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leibel SA, Zelefsky MJ, Kutcher GJ, et al.: Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of the prostate: interim report of a phase-1 dose-escalation study. J Urol 1994, 152:1792–1798.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Michalski JM, Purdy JA, Winter K, et al.: Preliminary report of toxicity following 3D radiation therapy for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 46:391–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryu JK, Winter K, Michalski JM, et al.: Interim report of toxicity from 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406, level III (79.2 Gy). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 54:1036–1046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalski JM, Winter K, Purdy JA, et al.: Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer with RTOG 9406 dose level IV. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 58:735–742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Michalski JM, Winter K, Purdy JA, et al.: Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406 dose Level V. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 62:706–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dearnaley DP, Khoo VS, Norman AR, et al.: Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999, 353:267–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koper PC, Stroom JC, van PuttenWL, et al.: Acute morbidity reduction using 3DCRT for prostate carcinoma: a randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 43:727–734.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen LN, Pollack A, Zagars GK: Late effects after radiotherapy for prostate cancer in a randomized dose-response study: results of a self-assessment questionnaire. Urology 1998, 51:991–997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zelefsky MJ, Fuks Z, Hunt M, et al.: High-dose radiation delivered by intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2001, 166:876–881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al.: Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase-III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 53:1097–1105. Randomized clinical trial demonstrating benefit of high-dose conformal radiation therapy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al.: Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005, 294:1233–1239. Randomized clinical trial of high-dose proton beam therapy demonstrating a benefit compared with dose escalation.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dearnaley DP, Hall E, Lawrence D, et al.: Phase-III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects. Br J Can 2005, 92:488–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peeters ST, Heemsbergen WD, van Putten WL, et al.: Acute and late complications after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing 68 Gy to 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61:1019–1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beckendorf V, Guerif S, Le Prise E, et al.: The GETUG 70 Gy vs. 80 Gy randomized trial for localized prostate cancer: feasibility and acute toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 60:1056–1065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: RTOG 0126: A phase-III randomized study of high-dose 3D-CRT/IMRT versus standard-dose 3D-CRT/IMRT in patients treated for localized prostate cancer. http://www.rtog.org/members/ protocols/0126/p0126.pdf. Accessed December 23, 2005.

  26. Pilepich MV, Buzydlowski JW, John MJ, et al.: Phase-II trial of hormonal cytoreduction with megestrol and diethylstilbestrol in conjunction with radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate: outcome results of RTOG 83-07. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 32:175–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pilepich MV, Winter K, John MJ, et al.: Phase-III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 50:1243–1252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Roach M 3rd, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, et al.: Phase-III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:1904–1911. Important randomized clinical trial showing benefit of pelvic radiation therapy and neoadjuvant hormone therapy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. D’Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M, et al.: 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 292:821–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Denham JW, Steigler A, Lamb DS, et al.: Short-term androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: results from the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.01 randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2005, 6:841–850. Randomized clinical trial showing benefit of 6 months of hormone therapy in reducing local occurrence and metastases.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: RTOG 99-10: a phase-III trial to evaluate the duration of neoadjuvant total androgen suppression (TAS) and radiation therapy (RT) in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. http://www. rtog.org/members/protocols/99-10/99-10.pdf. Accessed December 23, 2005.

  32. Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al.: Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase-III randomised trial. Lancet 2002, 360:103–106. Landmark randomized clinical trial demonstrating overall survival benefit of long-term androgen deprivation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pilepich MV, Winter K, Lawton CA, et al.: Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma: long-term results of phase III RTOG 85-31. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61:1285–1290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanks GE, Pajak TF, Porter A, et al.: Phase-III trial of longterm adjuvant androgen deprivation after neoadjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:3972–3978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Granfors T, Modig H, Damber JE, et al.: Combined orchiectomy and external radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for nonmetastatic prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node involvement: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 1998, 159:2030–2034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. US National Institutes of Health: ClinicalTrials.gov. Hormone therapy with or without surgery or radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui/show/NCT00002633. Accessed December 23, 2005.

  37. US National Institutes of Health: ClinicalTrials.gov. RADAR Trial — Randomised androgen deprivation and radiotherapy. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/ NCT0019856. Accessed December 23, 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff M. Michalski MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalski, J.M. Radiation therapy in the management of locally advanced prostate cancer. Curr prostate rep 4, 116–123 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11918-006-0024-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11918-006-0024-x

Keywords

Navigation