Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Present Uses, Future Applications, and Technical Underpinnings of Electrical Impedance Myography

  • Nerve and Muscle (L H Weimer, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In this article, we provide an overview of electrical impedance myography (EIM), including its technical and theoretical basis, a summary of its varied applications, and ongoing developments.

Recent Findings

EIM has been used as a disease severity biomarker in a variety of disorders affecting the muscle, ranging from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to muscular dystrophies to disuse atrophy due to the weightlessness of space. In ALS, studies have demonstrated that major reductions in sample size in clinical trials can be achieved. Similarly, in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the technique tracks disease progression and is sensitive to the beneficial effect of steroids. More basic work has demonstrated that EIM can provide a non-invasive means of tracking muscle fiber size. Ongoing innovations include the development of techniques for assessing muscle contraction.

Summary

EIM is gradually being adopted as a useful, practical, and convenient tool for the assessment of neuromuscular conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Grimnes S, Martinsen OG. Bioimpedance and bioelectricity basics. 3rd ed. Academic Press. 2014. p. 584

  2. Sanchez B, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance myography and its applications in neuromuscular disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14(1):107--118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-016-0491-x.

  3. Foster KR, Schwan HP. Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17:25–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fricke H, Morse S. The electric resistance and capacity of blood for frequencies between 800 and 4(1/2) million cycles. J. Gen. Physiol. 1925;9:153–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Valdiosera R, Clausen C, Eisenberg RS. Circuit models of the passive electrical properties of frog skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1974;63:432–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rush S. Methods of measuring the resistivities of anisotropic conducting media in situ. J Res Natl Bur Stand Sect C Eng Instrum. 1962;66C:217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai JZ, Cao H, Tungjitkusolmun S, Woo EJ, Vorperian VR, Webster JG. Dependence of apparent resistance of four-electrode probes on insertion depth. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000;47:41–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kun S, Peura R. Effects of sample geometry and electrode configuration on measured electrical resistivity of skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000;47:163–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clerc L. Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. J Physiol. 1976;255:335–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Steendijk P, Mur G, Van Der Velde ET, Baan J. The four-electrode resistivity technique in anisotropic media: theoretical analysis and application on myocardial tissue in vivo. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993;40:1138–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gielen FLH, Wallinga-de Jongeand W, Boon KL. Electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle tissue: experimental results from different muscles in vivo. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1984;22:569–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. • Li J, Jafarpoor M, Bouxsein M, Rutkove SB. Distinguishing neuromuscular disorders based on the passive electrical material properties of muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2015;51:49–55. Electrical impedance measurements can differentiate between different categories of disease

  13. Sanchez B, Li J, Bragos R, Rutkove SB. Differentiation of the intracellular structure of slow- versus fast-twitch muscle fibers through evaluation of the dielectric properties of tissue. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garmirian LP, Chin AB, Rutkove SB. Discriminating neurogenic from myopathic disease via measurement of muscle anisotropy. Muscle Nerve. 2009;39:16–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rutkove SB, JS W, Zaidman C, Kapur K, Yim S, Pasternak A, et al. Loss of electrical anisotropy is an unrecognized feature of dystrophic muscle that may serve as a convenient index of disease status. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:3546–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foster K, Lukaski H. Whole-body impedance—what does it measure? Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:3885–965.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tarulli AW, Garmirian LP, Fogerson PM, Rutkove SB. Localized muscle impedance abnormalities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2009;10:90–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutkove SB, Shefner JM, Gregas M, Butler H, Caracciolo J, Lin C, et al. Characterizing spinal muscular atrophy with electrical impedance myography. Muscle Nerve. 2010;42:915–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spieker AJ, Narayanaswami P, Fleming L, Keel JC, Muzin SC, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance myography in the diagnosis of radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48:800–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutkove SB, Geisbush TR, Mijailovic A, Shklyar I, Pasternak A, Visyak N, et al. Cross-sectional evaluation of electrical impedance myography and quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a clinical trial setting. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;51:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. • Statland JM, Heatwole C, Eichinger K, Dilek N, Martens WB, Tawil R. Electrical impedance myography in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54:696–701. Electrical impedance myography is sensitive to disease severity in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rutkove SB, Aaron R, Shiffman CA. Localized bioimpedance analysis in the evaluation of neuromuscular disease. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25:390–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rutkove SB, Zhang H, Schoenfeld DA, Raynor EM, Shefner JM, Cudkowicz ME, et al. Electrical impedance myography to assess outcome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:2413–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rutkove SB, Caress JB, Cartwright MS, Burns TM, Warder J, David WS, et al. Electrical impedance myography as a biomarker to assess ALS progression. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13:439–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shellikeri S, Yunusova Y, Green JR, Pattee GL, Berry JD, Rutkove SB, et al. Electrical impedance myography in the evaluation of the tongue musculature in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. 2015;52:584–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McIlduff CE, Yim S, Pacheck A, Geisbush T, Mijailovic ARS. An improved electrical impedance myography tongue array for use in clinical trials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:932–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang LL, Spieker AJ, Li J, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance myography for monitoring motor neuron loss in the SOD1 G93A amyotrophic lateral sclerosis rat. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:2505–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Li J, Sung M, Rutkove SB. Electrophysiologic biomarkers for assessing disease progression and the effect of riluzole in SOD1 G93A ALS mice. PLoS One. 2013;e65976:8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li J, Jafarpoor M, Bouxsein M, Rutkove SB. Distinguishing neuromuscular disorders based on the passive electrical material properties of muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2015;51(1):49–55. Published online 2014 Nov 19. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24270.

  30. Ahad MA, Narayanaswami P, Kasselman LJ, Rutkove SB. The effect of subacute denervation on the electrical anisotropy of skeletal muscle: implications for clinical diagnostic testing. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:882–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Li J, Pacheck A, Sanchez B, Rutkove SB. Single and modeled multifrequency electrical impedance myography parameters and their relationship to force production in the ALS SOD1G93A mouse. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;1–7.

  32. Rutkove SB, Gregas MC, Darras BT. Electrical impedance myography in spinal muscular atrophy: a longitudinal study. Muscle Nerve. 2012;45:642–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. • Kolb SJ, Coffey CS, Yankey JW, Krosschell K, Arnold WD, Rutkove SB, et al. Baseline results of the NeuroNEXT spinal muscular atrophy infant biomarker study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3:132–45. Electrical impedance myography is sensitive to the infantile form of spinal muscular atrophy

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Arnold WD, McGovern VL, Sanchez B, Li J, Corlett KM, Kolb SJ, et al. The neuromuscular impact of symptomatic SMN restoration in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;87:116–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Li J, Geisbush TR, Arnold WD, Rosen GD, Zaworski PG, Rutkove SBA. Comparison of three electrophysiological methods for the assessment of disease status in a mild spinal muscular atrophy mouse model. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Rutkove SB, Esper GJ, Lee KS, Aaron R, Shiffman CA. Electrical impedance myography in the detection of radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve. 2005;32:335–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Z, Dong T, Chen L, Wang X, Jiang L, Yu Y. Electrical impedance myography for discriminating traumatic peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:384–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li Z, Chen L, Zhu Y, Wei Q, Liu W, Tian D, et al. Handheld electrical impedance myography probe for assessing carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:1572–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rutkove SB, Geisbush TR, Mijailovic A, Shklyar I, Pasternak A, Visyak N, et al. Cross-sectional evaluation of electrical impedance myography and quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a clinical trial setting. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;51:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. • Rutkove SB, Kapur K, Zaidman CM, Wu JS, Pasternak A, Madabusi L, et al. Electrical impedance myography for assessment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol. 2017;81:622–32. Electrical impedance myography can detect disease progression as early as 6 months in boys with muscular dystrophy as compared to healthy ones

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li J, Geisbush TR, Rosen GD, Lachey J, Mulivor A, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance myography for the in and ex vivo assessment of muscular dystrophy (mdx) mouse muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49:829–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu JS, Li J, Greenman RL, Bennett D, Geisbush T, Rutkove SB. Assessment of aged mdx mice by electrical impedance myography and magnetic resonance imaging. Muscle Nerve. 2015;52:598–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanchez B, Li J, Yim S, Pacheck A, Widrick JJ, Rutkove SB. Evaluation of electrical impedance as a biomarker of myostatin inhibition in wild type and muscular dystrophy mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140521.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Tarulli A, Esper GJ, Lee KS, Aaron R, Shiffman CA, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance myography in the bedside assessment of inflammatory myopathy. Neurology. 2005;65:451–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Urso ML, Clarkson PM, Price TB. Immobilization effects in young and older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96:564–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Aaron R, Esper GJ, Shiffman CA, Bradonjic K, Lee KS, Rutkove SB. Effects of age on muscle as measured by electrical impedance myography. Physiol Meas. 2006;27(10):953–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kortman HG, Wilder SC, Geisbush TR, Narayanaswami P, Rutkove SB. Age- and gender-associated differences in electrical impedance values of skeletal muscle. Physiol Meas. 2013;34:1611–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Iannuzzi-Sucich M, Prestwood KM, Kenny AM. Prevalence of sarcopenia and predictors of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M772–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:81–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tarulli AW, Duggal N, Esper GJ, Garmirian LP, Fogerson PM, Lin CH, et al. Electrical impedance myography in the assessment of disuse atrophy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1806–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Li J, Spieker AJ, Rosen GD, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance alterations in the rat hind limb with unloading. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13:37–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sung M, Li J, Spieker AJ, Spatz J, Ellman R, Ferguson VL, et al. Spaceflight and hind limb unloading induce similar changes in electrical impedance characteristics of mouse gastrocnemius muscle. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13:405–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Nescolarde L, Yanguas J, Lukaski H, Alomar X, Rosell-Ferrer J, Rodas G. Localized bioimpedance to assess muscle injury. Physiol Meas. 2013;34:237–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nescolarde L, Yanguas J, Lukaski H, Alomar X, Rosell-Ferrer J, Rodas G. Effects of muscle injury severity on localized bioimpedance measurements. Physiol Meas. 2015;36:27–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nescolarde L. Detection of muscle gap by L-BIA in muscle injuries: clinical prognosis. Physiol Measur. 2017;38(7):L1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sanchez B, Iyer SR, Li J, Kapur K, Xu S, Rutkove SB, et al. Non-invasive assessment of muscle injury in healthy and dystrophic animals with electrical impedance myography. Muscle Nerve. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25559.

  57. Zaidman CM, Wang LL, Connolly AM, Florence J, Wong BL, Parsons JA, et al. Electrical impedance myography in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and healthy controls: a multicenter study of reliability and validity. Muscle Nerve. 2015;52:592–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. NCT02611674. Methodology Study of Novel Outcome Measures to Assess Progression of ALS. Biog. Inc. 2016.

  59. Jafarpoor M, Li J, White JK, Rutkove SB. Optimizing electrode configuration for electrical impedance measurements of muscle via the finite element method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60:1446–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Rutkove S, Pacheck A, Sanchez B. Sensitivity distribution simulations of surface electrode configurations for electrical impedance myography. Muscle Nerve. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25561.

  61. McClendon JF. The increased permeability of striated muscle to ions during contraction. Am J Physiol Leg Content. 1912;29:302–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Dubuisson M. Recherches sur les modifications qui survien-nent dans la conductibilité électrique du muscle au cours de la contraction. Arch Int Physiol Taylor & Francis. 1933;37:35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bozler E. The change of alternating current impedance of muscle produced by contraction. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1935;6:217–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bozler E, Cole KS. Electric impedance and phase angle of muscle in rigor. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1935;6:229–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sanchez B, Li J, Geisbush T, Bragos R, Rutkove S. Impedance alterations in healthy and diseased mice during electrically-induced muscle contraction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014:1–18.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health R01 NS055099 and K24NS060951.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Division of Neuromuscular Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, TCC-810, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Benjamin Sanchez & Seward B. Rutkove

Authors
  1. Benjamin Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seward B. Rutkove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seward B. Rutkove.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Benjamin Sanchez has received personal fees from ImpediMed, Inc., and Maxim Integrated, Inc. In addition, Dr. Sanchez has a patent 2015123603 A1 licensed to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Seward B. Rutkove has equity in and serves a consultant and scientific advisor to Skulpt/Myolex, Inc., a company that designs impedance devices for clinical and research uses; he is also a member of the company’s board of directors. The company also has an option to license patented impedance technology of which Dr. Rutkove is named as an inventor. In addition, Dr. Rutkove has a patent US Patent #9,014,797, electrical impedance myography licensed to Skulpt, Inc.; a patent US Patent #8,892,198, devices and methods for evaluating tissue licensed to Skulpt, Inc.; a patent US patent application: a hand-held device for electrical impedance myography pending; and a patent PCT/US2015/015961, electrical impedance myography pending.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nerve and Muscle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanchez, B., Rutkove, S.B. Present Uses, Future Applications, and Technical Underpinnings of Electrical Impedance Myography. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 17, 86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0793-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0793-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation