Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current Trends in the Rate of Rectal Cancer Restorative Operations in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

  • Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer (S Huerta, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The following review addresses the relationship between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and the rate of restorative operations in patients with rectal cancer.

Recent Findings

The rate of restorative operations performed for rectal cancer has improved over the past several decades. The relationship between this increase and the addition of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to the treatment regimen for locally advanced rectal cancer is still being defined. Improved rates of sphincter-sparing procedures between patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation compared to those who receive treatment postoperatively have not been supported in the literature. The patients who seem to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy in terms of sphincter preservation are those with distal tumors. Better tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and longer interval to surgical intervention appear to have little if any benefit to preserving the sphincter.

Summary

Increased rates of restorative operations for rectal cancer seem to be most significant among distal tumors. The reasons for the increase are likely multifactorial and include improvements in patient selection, surgical technique, imaging modalities, and patient care. The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in this setting remains equivocal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NCRT:

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

CRT:

Chemoradiotherapy

APR:

Abdominoperineal resection

LAR:

Low anterior resection

TME:

Total mesorectal excision

SSS:

Sphincter-sparing surgery

LARC:

Locally advanced rectal cancer

cCR:

Clinical complete response

pCR:

Pathologic complete response

CR:

Complete response

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Lange MM, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJ. One hundred years of curative surgery for rectal cancer: 1908-2008. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(5):456–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gillen P, Peel AL. Comparison of the mortality, morbidity and incidence of local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer treated by either stapled anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg. 1986;73(5):339–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800730504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Swedish Rectal Cancer T, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Pahlman L, Rutqvist LE, et al. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(14):980–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199704033361402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cancer NGVPMR. Rectal Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). 2016. p. 1–136. https://www.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/colorectal/english/rectal.pdf

  7. Grosek J, Velenik V, Edhemovic I, Omejc M. The influence of the distal resection margin length on local recurrence and long-term survival in patients with rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy and sphincter-preserving rectal resection. Radiol Oncol. 2017;51(2):169–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sineshaw HM, Jemal A, Thomas CR Jr, Mitin T. Changes in treatment patterns for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the United States over the past decade: an analysis from the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2016;122(13):1996–2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Balch GC, De Meo A, Guillem JG. Modern management of rectal cancer: a 2006 update. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(20):3186–95. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i20.3186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Janjan NA, Khoo VS, Abbruzzese J, Pazdur R, Dubrow R, Cleary KR, et al. Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D Anderson Cancer Center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44(5):1027–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00099-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiotis SP, Weber SM, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Paty PB, Guillem JG, et al. Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194(2):131–5; discussion 135–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01159-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Das P, Rodel C, Kuo LJ, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(9):835–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70172-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pucciarelli S, Toppan P, Friso ML, Russo V, Pasetto L, Urso E, et al. Complete pathologic response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy for middle to lower rectal cancer is not a prognostic factor for a better outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(11):1798–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0681-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerard A, Buyse M, Nordlinger B, Loygue J, Pene F, Kempf P, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Ann Surg. 1988;208(5):606–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198811000-00011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aschele C, Pinto C, Cordio S, Rosati G, Tagliagambe A, Artale S, et al. Preoperative fluorouracil (FU)-based chemoradiation with and without weekly oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic response analysis of the Studio Ter-apia Adjuvante Retto (STAR)-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(18S):CRA4008. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.18s.cra4008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Crane CH, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Vauthey JN, Thames HD, Curley SA, et al. Response to preoperative chemoradiation increases the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced low rectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97(2):517–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, et al. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(31):5124–30. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bujko K, Kepka L, Michalski W, Nowacki MP. Does rectal cancer shrinkage induced by preoperative radio(chemo)therapy increase the likelihood of anterior resection? A systematic review of randomised trials. Radiother Oncol. 2006;80(1):4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerard JP, Rostom Y, Gal J, Benchimol D, Ortholan C, Aschele C, et al. Can we increase the chance of sphincter saving surgery in rectal cancer with neoadjuvant treatments: lessons from a systematic review of recent randomized trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012;81(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Song JH, Jeong JU, Lee JH, Kim SH, Cho HM, Um JW, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiat Oncol J. 2017;35(3):198–207. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00059. This is a meta-analysis of randomized trials which found no difference in restorative operation rates between postoperative and NCRT; however, in subgroup analysis, conversion from planned APR to a sphincter-sparing procedure was seen in those patients with distal rectal tumors.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. • MAS K, Ang CW, Hakeem AR, Scott N, Saunders RN, Botterill I. The impact of tumour distance from the anal verge on clinical management and outcomes in patients having a curative resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(12):2056–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3581-0. This study characterizes the outcomes in distal tumors and finds that tumor distance results in higher rates of NCRT but also higher rates of non-restorative operations.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, Nahas SC, Ribeiro U Jr, Silva ESAH Jr, et al. Long-term results of preoperative chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer correlation between final stage and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(1):90–9; discussion 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.10.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerard JP, Chapet O, Nemoz C, Hartweig J, Romestaing P, Coquard R, et al. Improved sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer with high-dose preoperative radiotherapy: the lyon R96-02 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(12):2404–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.08.170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ihn MH, Kim YH, Kim DW, Oh HK, Lee SY, Park JT, et al. Effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on the likelihood of sphincter preservation surgery in locally advanced distal rectal cancer: a longitudinal study based on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2159–67. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4286-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Onaitis MW, Noone RB, Fields R, Hurwitz H, Morse M, Jowell P, et al. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer does not influence survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(10):801–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0801-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Francois Y, Nemoz CJ, Baulieux J, Vignal J, Grandjean JP, Partensky C, et al. Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90-01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(8):2396. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. • Du D, Su Z, Wang D, Liu W, Wei Z. Optimal interval to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.012. This article reviews the relevant literature for the optimal wait period to surgery after NCRT and found that while the rates of pCR were higher, this had no impact on rates of sphincter preservation.

  28. Petrelli F, Sgroi G, Sarti E, Barni S. Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies. Ann Surg. 2016;263(3):458–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Krouse RS, Herrinton LJ, Grant M, Wendel CS, Green SB, Mohler MJ, et al. Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: manifestations by sex. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4664–70. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ozgen Z, Ozden S, Atasoy BM, Ozyurt H, Gencosmanoglu R, Imeryuz N. Long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by sphincter-preserving resection on anal sphincter function in relation to quality of life among locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10(1):168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0479-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Battersby NJ, Juul T, Christensen P, Janjua AZ, Branagan G, Emmertsen KJ, et al. Predicting the risk of bowel-related quality-of-life impairment after restorative resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(4):270–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly B. Cunningham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Surgery and Surgical Innovations in Colorectal Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cunningham, H.B., Weis, J.J. & Taveras, L.R. Current Trends in the Rate of Rectal Cancer Restorative Operations in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 14, 31–36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-018-0400-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-018-0400-2

Keywords

Navigation