Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New Concepts in Bladder Sensation and Urinary Urgency

  • Overactive Bladder and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (U Lee and S Adelstein, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the evaluation and measurement of urinary urgency and bladder sensation.

Recent Findings

New technologies have been developed to improve our diagnostic capabilities in urinary urgency and bladder sensation. Recent developments include MRI-based neuroimaging and novel tablet-based sensation meters that can be used during urodynamics as well as during oral hydration.

Summary

Commonly used metrics for urinary urgency and bladder sensation include the use of validated surveys/void diaries and standardized verbal sensory thresholds during urodynamics. However, these metrics are highly subjective and prone to significant bias. There has been an evolution in evaluation metrics ranging from the use of reflex testing to electrical perception testing to the use of neuroimaging and the development of sensation meters. Neuroimaging allows for mapping of specific brain areas involved in the different phases of voiding and provides an anatomic basis for different forms of overactive bladder. The sensation meter allows for generation of real-time sensation-capacity curves which enables easy and objective comparison between patients as well as potential subtyping of different forms of overactive bladder. In addition, new research supports the concept of differing forms of urgency and the use of novel patient-derived terminologies for urinary urgency and bladder sensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Cardona-Grau D, Spettel S. History of the term overactive bladder. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2014;9:48–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-013-0218-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Vats V, Thompson C, Kopp ZS, Milsom I. National community prevalence of overactive bladder in the United States stratified by sex and age. Urology. 2011;77:1081–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coyne KS, Kvasz M, Ireland AM, Milsom I, Kopp ZS, Chapple CR. Urinary incontinence and its relationship to mental health and health-related quality of life in men and women in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;61:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abrams P, Chapple CR, Junemann KP, Sharpe S. Urinary urgency: a review of its assessment as the key symptom of the overactive bladder syndrome. World J Urol. 2012;30:385–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0742-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Melick HH, Gisolf KW, Eckhardt MD, van Venrooij GE, Boon TA. One 24-hour frequency-volume chart in a woman with objective urinary motor urge incontinence is sufficient. Urology. 2001;58:188–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzgerald MP, Ayuste D, Brubaker L. How do urinary diaries of women with an overactive bladder differ from those of asymptomatic controls? BJU Int. 2005;96:365–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Locher JL, Goode PS, Roth DL, Worrell RL, Burgio KL. Reliability assessment of the bladder diary for urinary incontinence in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M32–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shy M, Fletcher SG. Objective evaluation of overactive bladder: which surveys should I use? Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2013;8:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-012-0167-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosier PF. The evidence for urodynamic investigation of patients with symptoms of urinary incontinence. F1000Prime Rep. 2013;5:8. https://doi.org/10.12703/P5-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Klevmark B. Volume threshold for micturition. Influence of filling rate on sensory and motor bladder function. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2002;210:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wyndaele JJ. The normal pattern of perception of bladder filling during cystometry studied in 38 young healthy volunteers. J Urol. 1998;160:479–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wyndaele JJ, De Wachter S. Cystometrical sensory data from a normal population: comparison of two groups of young healthy volunteers examined with 5 years interval. Eur Urol. 2002;42:34–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Erdem E, Tunckiran A, Acar D, Kanik EA, Akbay E, Ulusoy E. Is catheter cause of subjectivity in sensations perceived during filling cystometry? Urology. 2005;66:1000–3. discussion 1003-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Erdem E, Akbay E, Doruk E, Cayan S, Acar D, Ulusoy E. How reliable are bladder perceptions during cystometry? Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:306–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20045. discussion 10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Starkman JS, Dmochowski RR. Urgency assessment in the evaluation of overactive bladder (OAB). Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowenstein L, FitzGerald MP, Kenton K, Brubaker L, Gruenwald I, Papier I, et al. Validation of a real-time urodynamic measure of urinary sensation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:661.e1-4; discussion 661.e4-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.02.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Steanu ID, Albu SE, Persu C. The place of the ice water test (IWT) in the evaluation of the patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Maedica (Buchar). 2012;7:125–30.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Geirsson G, Lindstrom S, Fall M, Gladh G, Hermansson G, Hjalmas K. Positive bladder cooling test in neurologically normal young children. J Urol. 1994;151:446–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Meel TD, de Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ. Repeated ice water tests and electrical perception threshold determination to detect a neurologic cause of detrusor overactivity. Urology. 2007;70:772–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ. Can the sensory threshold toward electrical stimulation be used to quantify the subjective perception of bladder filling? A study in young healthy volunteers. Urology. 2001;57:655–8. discussion 658-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Wachter S, Smith PP, Tannenbaum C, Van Koeveringe G, Drake M, Wyndaele JJ, et al. How should bladder sensation be measured? ICI-RS 2011. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:370–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada Y, Ukimura O, Liu G, Miki T, Daneshgari F. Efficacy of neuroselective and site-specific nociceptive stimuli of rat bladder. Urology. 2012;79:483.e7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. De Laet K, De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ. Current perception thresholds in the lower urinary tract: sine- and square-wave currents studied in young healthy volunteers. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:261–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ukimura O, Ushijima S, Honjo H, Iwata T, Suzuki K, Hirahara N, et al. Neuroselective current perception threshold evaluation of bladder mucosal sensory function. Eur Urol. 2004;45:70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Gao Y, Liao L, Blok BF. Erratum to: a resting-state functional MRI study on central control of storage: brain response provoked by strong desire to void. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47:1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1057-2. Non-invasive hydration protocol with concurrent MRI imaging techniques which confirmed earlier studies of brain activity during micturition and suggested differences between male and female healthy individuals.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krhut J, Tintera J, Holy P, Zachoval R, Zvara P. A preliminary report on the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous urodynamics to record brain activity during micturition. J Urol. 2012;188:474–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shy M, Fung S, Boone TB, Karmonik C, Fletcher SG, Khavari R. Functional magnetic resonance imaging during urodynamic testing identifies brain structures initiating micturition. J Urol. 2014;192:1149–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Heeringa R, de Wachter SG, van Kerrebroeck PE, van Koeveringe GA. Normal bladder sensations in healthy volunteers: a focus group investigation. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:1350–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heeringa R, van Koeveringe GA, Winkens B, van Kerrebroeck PE, de Wachter SG. Do patients with OAB experience bladder sensations in the same way as healthy volunteers? A focus group investigation. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:521–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Blaivas JG, Panagopoulos G, Weiss JP, Somaroo C. Two types of urgency. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:188–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. •• Nagle AS, Speich JE, De Wachter SG, Ghamarian PP, Le DM, Colhoun AF, et al. Non-invasive characterization of real-time bladder sensation using accelerated hydration and a novel sensation meter: an initial experience. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1417–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23137. Description of a novel sensation meter interface, which was developed to advance characterization of urgency in healthy and OAB individuals.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Naimi H, Nagle A, Vinod N, Kolli H, Sheen D. Characterization of bladder sensation event descriptions during non-invasive oral hydration in healthy adults. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:S518–669. Abstract #S654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Speich JE, Nagle AS, De Wachter SG, Klausner AP. The sensation meter: an unprompted method to characterize patient-reported bladder sensation in real-time:V001T04A001-V001T04A001. 2017;

  36. • Nenadic I, Mynderse L, Husmann D, Mehrmohammadi M, Bayat M, Singh A, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of bladder wall mechanical properties as a function of filling volume: potential application in bladder compliance assessment. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157818. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157818. Study employs non-invasive, focused ultrasound radiation in order to enhance current understanding of detrusor muscle physiology.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. • Bayat M, Kumar V, Denis M, Webb J, Gregory A, Mehrmohammadi M, et al. Correlation of ultrasound bladder vibrometry assessment of bladder compliance with urodynamic study results. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179598. Study demonstrated the utility of bladder vibrometry in evaluating changes in detrusor muscle physiology.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. • Nagle AS, Bernardo RJ, Varghese J, Carucci LR, Klausner AP, Speich JE. Comparison of 2D and 3D ultrasound methods to measure serial bladder volumes during filling: steps toward development of non-invasive ultrasound urodynamics. Bladder (San Franc). 2018;5:e32. Argues for the use of ultrasound imaging alongside UDS suggesting potential for subtyping OAB.

    Google Scholar 

  39. • Nagle AS, Klausner AP, Varghese J, Bernardo RJ, Colhoun AF, Barbee RW, et al. Quantification of bladder wall biomechanics during urodynamics: a methodologic investigation using ultrasound. J Biomech. 2017;61:232–41. Argues for the use of ultrasound imaging alongside UDS suggesting potential for subtyping OAB.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Colhoun AF, Klausner AP, Nagle AS, Carroll AW, Barbee RW, Ratz PH, et al. A pilot study to measure dynamic elasticity of the bladder during urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1086–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by NIH R01-DK101719.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam P. Klausner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Hameeda Naimi, John Speich, and Adam Klausner declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

In all studies performed by the authors, Institutional Review Board approval was obtained and all subjects provided informed consent for participation.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Overactive Bladder and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naimi, H.A., Speich, J.E. & Klausner, A.P. New Concepts in Bladder Sensation and Urinary Urgency. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 13, 132–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-018-0474-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-018-0474-3

Keywords

Navigation