Abstract
This study investigated how assistive reading software affected the reading performance of a group of 20 post-secondary students who had a primary diagnosis of attention disorder. These students used assistive reading software for most of a semester to read assignments for an English class and in testing sessions in which comparisons were made between normal, unassisted reading, and reading assisted by the soft ware. This software provides a synchronized visual and auditory presentation of text, and incorporates study skills tools for highlighting and note taking. Attention measures, reading speed, comprehension scores, and attitude questionnaire responses were obtained during these sessions. The principal findings were that the assistive software allowed the students to attend better to their reading, to reduce their distractibility, to read with less stress and fatigue, and to read for longer periods of time. It helped them to read faster and, thereby, to complete reading assignments in less time. It did not have a significant effect on comprehension, but it helped some students whose comprehension was very poor. The study results indicate that assistive reading software should be considered as a significant intervention to assist students who have attention disorders and as an accommodation to help them compensate for their disabilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276–292.
Barry, T., DeShazo, L., Klinger, R., Lyman, D., Bush, D., & Hawkins, L. (2001). “Visual selective attention versus sustained attention in boys with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.” Journal of Attention Disorders, 4, 201.
Brown, J., Fishco, V., & Hanna, G. (1993). The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
DuPaul, G., & Eckert, T. (1998). Academic interventions for students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 59–82.
DuPaul, G., & Stoner, G. (1994). ADHD in the schools: Assessment and intervention strategies. New York: Guilford.
Elkind, J. (1998). Computer reading machines for poor readers. Perspectives, 24(2), 9–13. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
Elkind, J., Black, M., & Murray, C. (1996). Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 159–186.
Elkind, J., Cohen, K., & Murray, C. (1993). Using computer-based readers to improve reading comprehension of students with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 238–259.
Fergusson, R. & Horwood, L. (1992). Attention deficit and reading achievement. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 375–385.
Hecker, L. (2000). The integrated language program at Landmark College. The National Dyslexia Research Foundation News, 4, 7–8.
Higgins, E., & Raskind, M. (1997). The compensatory effectiveness of optical character recognition/speech synthesis on reading comprehension of post-secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 75–87.
Hinshaw, S. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 127–155.
Katz, L., Goldstein, G., & Beers, S. (2001). Learning disabilities in older adolescents and adults: Clinical utility of the neuropsychological perspective. New York: Plenum Publishers.
Kurzweil Educational Systems. (2002). Kurzweil 3000. Burlington, MA: Kurzweil Educational Systems.
Leong, C. K. (1992). Enhancing reading comprehension with text-to-speech (DECtalk) computer system. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 205–217.
Levine, M. (1987). Developmental variation and learning disorders. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
Levine, M. (1994). Educational care: A system for understanding and helping children with learning problems at home and in school. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
Likert, R. (1970). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. In G. Summers (Ed.), Attitude measurement (pp. 149–158). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Lyon, G. R. (1996). The state of research. In S. C. Cramer & W. Ellis (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Lifelong issues (pp. 3–61). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Owings, J., Madigan, T., & Daniel, B. (1998). Who goes to tier I national universities? (NCES Publication No. 98-095). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
Pennington, B. (1991). Diagnosing learning disorders: A neuropsychological framework. New York: Guilford.
Rabiner, D., & Coie, J. (2000). Early attention problems and children’s reading achievement: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 859–867.
Robin, A. (1998). ADHD in adolescents: Diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford Press.
Shany, M., & Biemiller, A. (1995). Assisted reading practice: Effects on performance for poor readers in grades 3 and 4. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 382–395.
Schulte, A., Conners, C., & Osborne, S. (1999). Linkages between attention deficit disorders and reading disability. In D. D. Duane (Ed.), Reading and attention disorders (pp. 161–184). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
Shaywitz, B., Fletcher, J., & Shaywitz, S. (1994). Interrelationships between reading disability and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. In A. J. Capute, P. J. Accardo, & B. K. Shapiro (Eds.). Learning disabilities spectrum: ADD, ADHD, and LD (pp. 107–120). Baltimore, MD, York Press.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. Jr., (1988). Nonparametric statistics for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
Wechsler, D. (1997). The Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Wierderholt, J., & Bryant, B. (1994). Gray oral reading tests-third edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Wood, F., & Felton, R. (1994). Separate linguistic and attentional factors in the development of reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 14, 42–57.
Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery-revised. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hecker, L., Burns, L., Katz, L. et al. Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. Ann. of Dyslexia 52, 243–272 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0015-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0015-8