Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Approaches to Gastric Cancer

  • Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers (JD Berlin, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Gastric cancer is an aggressive malignancy, requiring a multimodality approach to achieve optimal curative rates even when the disease is amenable to surgical resection. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches differ across the globe—a preference for peri-operative chemotherapy exists in Europe, in contrast to the adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy in Asia and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in North America. There are nuances and limitations associated with each therapeutic strategy and an understanding of these distinct approaches is integral to judicious clinical application of the available data. Although a multimodal approach provides a clear survival benefit above a surgical-only approach, data report low completion rates of adjuvant therapy components and strongly suggest a need to refine patient selection particularly for ongoing treatment in the post-operative period. This may be achieved using a risk-stratified strategy. Hence, there is a need to transition from a generalised approach to a multimodality treatment towards one guided by individual patient clinical features and biomarker profiles in order to improve tolerability and patient outcomes irrespective of geographical variation in clinical practice. While the evidences supporting molecular features such as microsatellite instability and predictive gene signatures are provocative, prospective validation is required before these can be confidently used to direct clinical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians [Internet]. 2018 Nov [cited 2019 Mar 24];68(6):394–424. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207593

  2. Stomach cancer survival statistics | Cancer Research UK [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/stomach-cancer/survival#heading-Three

  3. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition) Preface to the English version. Gastric Cancer [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 20];24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y

  4. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up † on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 20]; Available from: www.springer.com.

  5. Pasquer A, Renaud F, Hec F, Gandon A, Vanderbeken M, Drubay V, et al. Is centralization needed for esophageal and gastric cancer patients with low operative risk? A nationwide study. Annals of Surgery [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 20];264(5):823–30. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2016/11000/Is_Centralization_Needed_for_Esophageal_and.19.aspx

  6. Dikken JL, van Sandick JW, Allum WH, Johansson J, Jensen LS, Putter H, et al. Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe. Br J Surg [Internet]. 2013 Jan [cited 2022 Apr 20];100(1):83–94. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23180474/

  7. Kim J, Bowlby R, Mungall AJ, Robertson AG, Odze RD, Cherniack AD, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature. 2017;541(7636):169–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bass AJ, Thorsson V, Shmulevich I, Reynolds SM, Miller M, Bernard B, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature [Internet]. 2014;513(7517):202–9. Available from. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13480.

  9. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, van de Velde CJH, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouché O, Lebreton G, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1715–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F, Reichardt P, Hohenberger W, Eisenberger CF, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European organisation for research and treatment of cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5210–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Girling DJ, Bancewicz J, Clark PI, Smith DB, Donnelly RJ, Fayers PM, et al. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1727–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alderson D, Cunningham D, Nankivell M, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, Crellin A, et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine followed by resection in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (UK MRC OE05): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):1249–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. • Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1948–57 This reference is of outstanding importance as it confirms the superiority of FLOT over ECF/ECX as peri-operative chemotherapy.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. • Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1810–20 This reference is of outstanding importance as the first study to show clinical utility of adjuvant S-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, Kinoshita T, Furukawa H, Yamaguchi T, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(33):4387–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. • Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2012;379(9813):315–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61873-4 This reference is of importance as it demonstrated the benefit of adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. • Kang YK, Yook JH, Park YK, Lee JS, Kim YW, Kim JY, et al. PRODIGY: a phase III study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 plus surgery and adjuvant S-1 versus surgery and adjuvant S-1 for resectable advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2021 Sep 10 [cited 2022 May 2];39(26):2903–13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34133211/. This reference is of importance as it reported benefit with peri-operative chemotherapy over adjuvant S-1 in a Korean population.

  19. Kakeji Y, Yoshida K, Kodera Y, Kochi M, Sano T, Ichikawa W, et al. Three-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel versus S-1 alone in stage III gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-07. Gastric Cancer [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Apr 20];25(1):188–96. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34351555/

  20. • Zhang X, Liang H, Li Z, Xue Y, Wang Y, Zhou Z, et al. Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Apr 20];22(8):1081–92. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1470204521002977/fulltext. This reference is of importance as it reported benefit with peri-operative chemotherapy over adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin in a Chinese population.

  21. Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, Clark PI, Langley RE. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(30):5062–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cunningham D, Stenning SP, Smyth EC, Okines AF, Allum WH, Rowley S, et al. Peri-operative chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (UK Medical Research Council ST03): primary analysis results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2–3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):357–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS, Donohue JH, Pisters PWT, Crane CH, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2006 Aug 20 [cited 2022 Apr 14];24(24):3953–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16921048/

  24. • Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2001 Sep 6 [cited 2022 Apr 14];345(10):725–30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11547741/. This reference is of outstanding importance as it describes the superiority of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy over surgery alone.

  25. Lee J, Lim DH, Kim S, Park SH, Park JO, Park YS, et al. Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: The ARTIST trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(3):268–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuchs CS, Enzinger PC, Meyerhardt J, Mayer RJ, Mamon HJ, Swanson RS, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil compared with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with fluorouracil and leucovorin after curative resection of gastric cancer: results from CALGB 80101 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2017 Nov 10 [cited 2022 May 4];35(32):3671–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28976791/

  27. Cats A, Jansen EPM, van Grieken NCT, Sikorska K, Lind P, Nordsmark M, et al. Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): an international, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):616–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshikawa T, Terashima M, Mizusawa J, Nunobe S, Nishida Y, Yamada T, et al. Four courses versus eight courses of adjuvant S-1 for patients with stage II gastric cancer (JCOG1104 [OPAS-1]): an open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2019 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Apr 20];4(3):208–16. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30679107/

  29. Kim IH, Park SS, Lee CM, Kim MC, Kwon IK, Min JS, et al. Efficacy of adjuvant S-1 versus XELOX chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection: a retrospective, multi-center observational study. Ann Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2018 May 1 [cited 2022 Apr 25];25(5):1176–83. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.icr.ac.uk/29450755/

  30. Tokunaga M, Mizusawa J, Machida N, Fukagawa T, Katai H, Nishida Y, et al. Phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy with adjuvant S-1 in locally advanced gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1509 (NAGISA trial). https://doi.org/101200/JCO20173515_supplTPS4134. 2017 May 30;35(15_suppl):TPS4134–TPS4134.

  31. Rivera F, Galán M, Tabernero J, Cervantes A, Vega-Villegas ME, Gallego J, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative irinotecan–cisplatin followed by concurrent irinotecan–cisplatin and radiotherapy for resectable locally advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics [Internet]. 2009 Dec 1 [cited 2022 May 4];75(5):1430–6. Available from: http://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360301609003629/fulltext

  32. van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. 2012.

  33. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smalley SR, Benedetti JK, Haller DG, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Ajani JA, et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(19):2327–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Park SH, Lim DH, Sohn TS, Lee J, Zang DY, Kim ST, et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant single-agent S1, S-1 with oxaliplatin, and postoperative chemoradiation with S-1 and oxaliplatin in patients with node-positive gastric cancer after D2 resection: the ARTIST 2 trial☆. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(3):368–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Goodman KA, Ou FS, Hall NC, Bekaii-Saab T, Fruth B, et al. Randomized phase II study of PET response-adapted combined modality therapy for esophageal cancer: mature results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial [Internet]. Vol. 39, J Clin Oncol. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.

  37. Bang YJ, van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): A phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2010;376(9742):687–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rivera F, Izquierdo-Manuel M, García-Alfonso P, Martínez de Castro E, Gallego J, Limón ML, et al. Perioperative trastuzumab, capecitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with HER2-positive resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: NEOHX phase II trial. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2021 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Apr 19];145:158–67. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.icr.ac.uk/33485079/

  39. Hofheinz RD, Hegewisch-Becker S, Kunzmann V, Thuss-Patience P, Fuchs M, Homann N, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel as perioperative treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie Gastric Cancer Study Group. Int J Cancer [Internet]. 2021 Sep 15 [cited 2022 Apr 19];149(6):1322–31. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.icr.ac.uk/34019698/

  40. Hofheinz RD, Haag GM, Ettrich TJ, Borchert K, Kretzschmar A, Teschendorf C, et al. Perioperative trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone for HER2-positive resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: final results of the PETRARCA multicenter randomized phase II trial of the AIO. https://doi.org/101200/JCO20203815_suppl4502. 2020 May 25;38(15_suppl):4502–4502.

  41. Wagner AD, Grabsch HI, Mauer M, Marreaud S, Caballero C, Thuss-Patience P, et al. EORTC-1203-GITCG - The “INNOVATION”-trial: effect of chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, in the perioperative treatment of HER2 positive, gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma on pathologic response rate: a randomized phase II-intergroup trial of the EORTC-Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, Korean Cancer Study Group and Dutch Upper GI-Cancer group. BMC Cancer. 2019 May 24;19(1).

  42. Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ, Dumitru F, Passalacqua R, Goswami C, et al. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9911):31–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilke H, Muro K, van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, Shimada Y, et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):1224–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Al-Batran SE, Hofheinz RD, Schmalenberg H, Strumberg D, Goekkurt E, Angermeier S, et al. Perioperative ramucirumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (RAMSES/FLOT7): results of the phase II-portion—a multicenter, randomized phase II/III trial of the German AIO and Italian GOIM. https://doi.org/101200/JCO20203815_suppl4501. 2020 May 25;38(15_suppl):4501–4501.

  45. Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T, Ryu MH, Chao Y, Kato K, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet [Internet]. 2017;390(10111):2461–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31827-5

  46. Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10294):27–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Athauda A, Starling N, Chau I, Cunningham D, Watkins DJ, Rao S, et al. Perioperative FLOT plus anti-PD-L1 avelumab (FLOT-A) in resectable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGA): interim safety analysis results from the ICONIC trial. https://doi.org/101200/JCO2021393_suppl201. 2021 Jan 22;39(3_suppl):201–201.

  48. • Phase II trial of perioperative pembrolizumab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GC/GEJ) adenocarcinoma [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/10517/presentation/20151. This reference is of importance as it is the first clinical trial to show efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in a biomarker-unselected population of resectable gastric adenocarcinoma patients.

  49. Al-Batran S-E, Lorenzen S, Thuss-Patience PC, Homann N, Schenk M, Lindig U, et al. Surgical and pathological outcome, and pathological regression, in patients receiving perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT chemotherapy versus FLOT alone for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Interim results from DANTE, a randomized, multicenter, phase IIb trial of the FLOT-AIO German Gastric Cancer Group and Swiss SAKK. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO20224016_suppl4003. June 2, 2022;40(16_suppl):4003–4003.

  50. • Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, van Cutsem E, Piessen G, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2021;384(13):1191–203. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789008. This reference is of outstanding importance as it established a new standard-of-care with adjuvant nivolumab following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with oesophageal and GOJ cancers with residual pathological disease.

  51. Lauren P. The two main histological types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Heger U, Blank S, Wiecha C, Langer R, Weichert W, Lordick F, et al. Is preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery the appropriate treatment for signet ring cell containing adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach? Annals of Surgical Oncology 2014 21:5 [Internet]. 2014 Jan 14 [cited 2022 Apr 20];21(5):1739–48. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-013-3462-z

  53. Al-Batran SE, Hofheinz RD, Pauligk C, Kopp HG, Haag GM, Luley KB, et al. Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma FLOT4-AIO. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(12):1697–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Smyth EC, Fassan M, Cunningham D, Allum WH, Okines AFC, Lampis A, et al. Effect of pathologic tumor response and nodal status on survival in the medical research council adjuvant gastric infusional chemotherapy trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(23):2721–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Smyth EC, Wotherspoon A, Peckitt C, Gonzalez D, Hulkki-Wilson S, Eltahir Z, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, and survival: an exploratory analysis of the Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(9):1197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Choi YY, Kim H, Shin SJ, Kim HY, Lee J, Yang HK, et al. Microsatellite instability and programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in stage II/III gastric cancer: post hoc analysis of the CLASSIC randomized controlled study. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Apr 20];270(2):309–16. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.icr.ac.uk/29727332/

  57. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer from the departments of medicine (D [Internet]. Vol. 355, n engl j med. 2006. Available from: www.nejm.org

  58. Bajetta E, Floriani I, di Bartolomeo M, Labianca R, Falcone A, di Costanzo F, et al. Randomized trial on adjuvant treatment with FOLFIRI followed by docetaxel and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for radically resected gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1373–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. • Pietrantonio F, Miceli R, Raimondi A, Kim YW, Kang WK, Langley RE, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of the value of microsatellite instability as a biomarker in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(35):3392–400 This reference is of outstanding importance as it demonstrates that MSI-high is a good prognostic factor in gastric cancers treated with surgery alone, but is a differentially negative prognostic factor when peri-operative or adjuvant chemotherapy is used in conjunction with surgery.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, Bartlett B, Kemberling H, Eyring A, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2509–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. • Andre T, Tougeron D, Piessen G, la Fouchardiere CD, Louvet C, Adenis A, et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and adjuvant nivolumab in patients (pts) with localized microsatellite instability-high (MSI)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) oeso-gastric adenocarcinoma (OGA): The GERCOR NEONIPIGA phase II study. https://doi.org/101200/JCO2022404_suppl244. 2022 Jan 19;40(4_suppl):244–244. This reference is of importance as it reports a high pathological response rate in MMR-deficient patients who receive neoadjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab.

  62. Xu J, Jiang H, Pan Y, Gu K, Cang S, Han L, et al. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo as first-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma (ORIENT-16): first results of a randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2021;31(suppl_5):S1283–346.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, Muro K, Satoh T, Machado M, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(5):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Böger C, Behrens HM, Mathiak M, Krüger S, Kalthoff H, Röcken C. PD-L1 is an independent prognostic predictor in gastric cancer of Western patients. Oncotarget [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 20];7(17). Available from: www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/

  65. Janjigian YY, Sanchez-Vega F, Jonsson P, Chatila WK, Hechtman JF, Ku GY, et al. Genetic predictors of response to systemic therapy in esophagogastric cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(1):49–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Smyth EC, Nyamundanda G, Cunningham D, Fontana E, Ragulan C, Tan IB, et al. A seven-gene signature assay improves prognostic risk stratification of perioperative chemotherapy treated gastroesophageal cancer patients from the MAGIC trial. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(12):2536–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Cheong JH, Yang HK, Kim H, Kim WH, Kim YW, Kook MC, et al. Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2018;19(5):629–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30108-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. • Cheong JH, Wang SC, Park S, Porembka MR, Christie AL, Kim H, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic and predictive 32-gene signature for gastric cancer. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Apr 20];13(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35140202/. This reference is of outstanding importance as it describes an RNA-based gene signature capable of providing prognostic and predictive information in resectable gastric cancers based on a cohort of Asian patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

  69. Varkalaite G, Forster M, Franke A, Kupcinskas J, Skieceviciene J. Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: analysis of somatic cancer tissue mutations in plasma cell-free DNA for predicting disease state and patient survival. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2021 Sep 24 [cited 2022 May 2];12(9):e00403. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8462609/

  70. Yang J, Gong Y, Lam VK, Shi Y, Guan Y, Zhang Y, et al. Deep sequencing of circulating tumor DNA detects molecular residual disease and predicts recurrence in gastric cancer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2531-z

  71. Openshaw MR, Mohamed AA, Ottolini B, Fernandez-Garcia D, Richards CJ, Page K, et al. Longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumour DNA improves prognostication and relapse detection in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. British Journal of Cancer [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 20];123:1271–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-1002-8

  72. Maron SB, Chase LM, Lomnicki S, Kochanny S, Moore KL, Joshi SS, et al. Circulating tumor DNA sequencing analysis of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2019;1–16.

  73. Kim YW, Kim YH, Song Y, Kim HS, Sim HW, Poojan S, et al. Experimental & molecular medicine monitoring circulating tumor DNA by analyzing personalized cancer-specific rearrangements to detect recurrence in gastric cancer. [cited 2022 May 2]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-019-0292-5

  74. Leal A, van Grieken NC, Palsgrove DN, Phallen J, Medina JE, Hruban C, et al. White blood cell and cell-free DNA analyses for detection of residual disease in gastric cancer. [cited 2022 May 2]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14310-3

  75. Wang H, Li B, Liu Z, Gong J, Shao L, Ren J, et al. HER2 copy number of circulating tumour DNA functions as a biomarker to predict and monitor trastuzumab efficacy in advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2022 May 2];88:92–100. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29207318/

  76. Wang DS, Liu ZX, Lu YX, Bao H, Wu X, Zeng ZL, et al. Liquid biopsies to track trastuzumab resistance in metastatic HER2-positive gastric cancer. Gut. 2019;68(7):1152–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Fong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

C. Fong: Honoraria - Bristol Myers Squibb

E. Johnston: None

N. Starling: Research funding - AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, NIHR EME, RMCC, RM/ICR BRC, Merck; travel and accommodation - AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Merck, Roche, MSD Oncology; honoraria - Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, Pierre Fabre, Servier, GSK, Amgen, Lilly Bangladesh, Lilly Thailand, Novartis, Servier, Clinical Options; advisory board - Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Servier, MSD (Merck), MSD Oncology, Novartis, GSK

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fong, C., Johnston, E. & Starling, N. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Approaches to Gastric Cancer. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 23, 1247–1268 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-022-01004-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-022-01004-9

Keywords

Navigation