Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elementary teachers’ reflections on their use of digital instructional resources in four educational contexts: Belgium, Finland, Sweden, and U.S.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine teachers’ reflections on incorporating digital instructional resources (DIRs) into their mathematics teaching. We analyze qualitative interviews with 39 elementary school teachers from four educational contexts: Belgium, Finland, Sweden, and the U.S., using a framework proposed by Pepin et al. (Int J Math Educ 46: 645-661, 2017) to consider opportunities for DIRs to shift elements of teaching and learning in potentially transformative ways. Teachers described three major domains of teaching practice where they used DIRs: (a) class instruction, (b) student practice, and (c) professional participation. We found that teachers readily used DIRs during class instruction and to support student practice, guided by their existing instructional goals, which were shaped in part by education structures in the context. Few teachers incorporated DIRs in ways that transformed typical learning spaces. We also found that DIRs impacted several aspects of teachers’ professional practices, including professional learning and collaboration. In particular, participation in social media and resource sharing altered the nature of and ways teachers participated in their own professional learning. We assert that efforts to use DIRs to stimulate change need to begin with an understanding of teachers’ current practices and use our findings to identify three potential levers that might support movement toward change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We did not use school type (public, private, free, etc.) as a selection criterion, as these types are not easily equated across contexts.

  2. One Finnish teacher did not complete the interviews.

References

  • Choppin, J., Carson, C., Borys, Z., Cerosaletti, C., & Gillis, R. (2014). A typology for analyzing digital curricula in mathematics education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 2(1), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2013). The validity-comparability compromise in cross cultural studies in mathematics education. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, M. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1855-1864). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

  • Clark-Wilson, A. (2010). Emergent pedagogies and the changing role of the teacher in the TI-Nspire Navigator-networked mathematics classroom. ZDM, 42(7), 747–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daro, P. (2016). Digitally enhancing learning. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Curricula in school mathematics (pp. 285–296). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edson, A. J. (2017). Learner-controlled scaffolding linked to open- ended problems in a digital learning environment. ZDM. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0873-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L., & Lagrange, J. B. (2010). Introduction to section 3. Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain (pp. 287–292). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmi, K., & Ryve, A. (2015). Effective mathematics teaching in Finnish and Swedish teacher education discourses. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Garnier, H., Smith, M. S., Hollingsworth, H., Manaster, A., Wearne, D., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koljonen, T. (2020). Finnish mathematics curriculum materials and teachers’ interaction with them in two cultural-educational contexts. Doctoral dissertation, Doria: Åbo Academy University (ISBN: 978-952-12-4002-7).

  • Murphy, R., Gallagher, L., Krumm, A., Mislevy, J., & Hafter, A. (2014). Research on the use of Khan Academy in schools: Implementation report. SRI Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. The International Journal on Mathematics Education (ZDM), 49(5), 645–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. The International Journal on Mathematics Education (ZDM), 45(7), 929–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2016). Keeping an eye on the teacher in the digital curriculum race. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Curricula in school mathematics (pp. 195–204). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2018). Examining teachers’ interactions with curriculum resource to uncover pedagogical design capacity. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Recent advances in research on mathematics teachers’ textbooks and resources (pp. 69–88). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2018). Instructional activity and student interaction with digital resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: advances and issues (pp. 261–275). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., Deaney, R., & Hennessy, S. (2009). Using graphing software to teach about algebraic forms: A study of technology-supported practice in secondary-school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited. University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tour, E. (2017). Teachers’ self-initiated professional learning through personal learning networks. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 26(2), 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Bommel, J., Randahl, A.-C., Liljekvist, Y., & Ruthven, K. (2020). Tracing teachers’ transformation of knowledge in social media. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M. (2006). Slower algebra students meet faster tools: Solving algebra word problems with graphing software. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 356–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M. (2013). Designing for inquiry in school mathematics. Educational Designer, 2(6), Article 22. http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume2/issue6/article22.

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Swedish Research Council, Grant Number 2016-04616. All opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the funder.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janine T. Remillard.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Online student facing platforms

Appendix A: Online student facing platforms

Region

DIR

Student Guidance

Customization

Content description

FI

TT online

Textbook

Levels of difficulty

Curriculum program

YN online

Textbook

None

Curriculum program

Bingel

Videos

Adaptive, Task assignment and reports

Aligned to national core curriculum

Ville

None

Adaptive, Task assignment and reports

Skills practice

10Monkeys

None

Reports

Skills practice

Ekapeli

Modeling

Adaptive learning path

Skills practice

Vektor

None

None

Cognitive development

FL

Bingel

Videos

Adaptive, Task assignment and reports

Aligned with NP

Gynzy

None

Adaptive, Task assignment and reports

Skills practice

Ambrasoft

None

Adaptive, Task assignment and reports

Skills practice

SW

FM online

Textbook

Levels of difficulty

Curriculum program

Bingel

Videos

Adaptive, Task assignment and reports

Aligned with MD

Edqu.se

Videos, feedback on errors

Task assignment/creation, reports (with subscription)

Aligned to national core curriculum

Studi.se

Videos

None

Aligned to national core curriculum

Nomp

None

Task assignment/creation, reports (with subscription)

Aligned to national core curriculum

Multi

None

Adaptive

Skills practice

King of Math

None

Adaptive

Skills practice

Elevspel

None

None

Skills practice

Klockgården

None

None

Skills practice

Gruvan

None

None

Skills practice

Affären

None

None

Skills practice

10Monkeys

None

Reports

Skills practice

US

EM: ConnectEd

Interactive textbook

None

Curriculum program

Zearn

Videos, hints, scaffolded support

Reports

Aligned with EK

Compass Pathblazer2

Hints, explanations

Learning path, task assignment

Aligned with CCSS

First in Math

Explanations

Adaptive, task assignment

Aligned with CCSS

IXL

Explanations

Adaptive, task assignment and reports (with subscription)

Aligned with CCSS

Study Island

Videos, explanations

Adaptive, task assignment and reports

Aligned with CCSS

Dreambox

None

Learning path, reports

Aligned with CCSS

SumDog

None

Reports

Skills practice

BigBrainz

None

Reports

Skills practice

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Remillard, J.T., Van Steenbrugge, H., Machalow, R. et al. Elementary teachers’ reflections on their use of digital instructional resources in four educational contexts: Belgium, Finland, Sweden, and U.S.. ZDM Mathematics Education 53, 1331–1345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01295-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01295-6

Keywords

Navigation