Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beliefs and beyond: hows and whys in the teaching of proof

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we report on a study aimed at describing the way secondary school teachers treat proof and at understanding which factors may influence such a treatment. This study is part of a wider project on proof carried out for many years. In our theoretical framework, we combine references from research on proof with those from research on teachers in relation to their beliefs. The study was carried out through interviews with secondary school teachers aimed at learning how they describe their work with proof in the classroom, and to elicit beliefs and other factors that shape this work. Through the interviews we were able to detect reasons behind teachers’ choices in planning their work in the classroom. In the present paper, we concentrate on four cases that, among other factors, offer elements suitable to unravel the problem of inconsistencies using the construct of leading beliefs, i.e., beliefs (whose nature may vary from teacher to teacher) that seem to drive the way each teacher treats proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). The teaching of proof. Paper presented at the International Congress of Mathematicians, Beijing, China. In L. Tatsien (Ed.), Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians (Vol. 3, pp. 907–920). Beijing: Higher Education Press.

  • Berger, P. (1998). Exploring mathematical beliefs—the naturalistic approach. In M. Ahtee & E. Pehkonen (Eds.), Research methods in mathematics and science education (pp. 25–40). Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 185.

  • Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F., & Pedemonte, B. (2010). Research forum 2. Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation, with a reaction by L. Camargo, P. Perry, & C. Samper. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. E. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 34 (Vol. 1, pp. 179–209). Belo Horizonte: PME.

  • Castelnuovo, G. (1911). La rigueur dans l’enseignement mathématique dans les écoles moyennes. L’Enseignement Mathématique, 13, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicognani, E. (2002). Psicologia sociale e ricerca qualitativa [Social psychology and qualitative research]. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, J. (1984). The perception of mathematics among elementary school teachers. In J. Moser (Ed.), Proceedings PME-NA 6 (pp. 223–228). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In A. Bishop, P. Damerow, C. Keitel, & P. Gerdes (Eds.), Mathematics, education and society (pp. 99–101). Paris: Unesco, Documents series 3.

  • Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Leading beliefs in the teaching of proof. In W. Shloeglmann & J. Maasz (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education. New research results (pp. 59–74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handal, B. (2003). Teachers’ mathematical beliefs: A review. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G., & Barbeau, E. (2008). Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge. ZDM, 40, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G., & De Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI Study 19. Proof and proving in mathematics education. ZDM, 40, 329–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, P., & Miyakawa, T. (2008). When, how, and why prove theorems? A methodology for studying the perspective of geometry teachers. ZDM, 40, 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C. (1992). Mathematics teaching and mathematics teachers: A meta-case study. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 379–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhs, T. M., & Ball, D. L. (1986). Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge, skills, and dispositions (Research Memo). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.

  • Leatham, K. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F.-L., Hsieh, F.-J., Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (Eds.) (2009). Proof and proving in mathematics education. ICMI Study 19 conference proceedings. Taipei: The Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.

  • Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, M., & Knuth, E. (2003). The study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition & Instruction, 21(2), 175–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 550–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesken, B., & Toerner, G. (2010). The (unsolved) problem how world views and beliefs correlate with educational practices—some implicit ‘messages’ to the MAVI-world. Oral presentation at the MAVI-16 conference, Tallinn, 26–29 June 2010.

  • Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(6), 641–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). How can we examine the connections between teachers’ world views and their educational practices? Issues in Education, 8(2), 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Introduction to Thinking as communicating. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5, 429–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skott, J. (2009). Contextualising the notion of ‘belief enactment’. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, N. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. G. (1984). Teachers’ conception of mathematics and mathematics teaching on instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toerner, G. (1998). Self-estimating teachers’ views on mathematics teaching—modifying Dionne’s approach. In J. A. Dossey, J. O. Swafford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings PME-NA (Vol. 2, pp. 627-634). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.

  • Weber, K. (2005). Problem-solving, proving, and learning: The relationship between problem-solving processes and learning opportunities in the activity of proof construction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. S., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127–147). The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zammuner, V. L. (1998). Tecniche dell’intervista e del questionario [Interview and questionnaire techniques]. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Matematica dell’Università di Genova, Genoa, Italy

    Fulvia Furinghetti & Francesca Morselli

Authors
  1. Fulvia Furinghetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesca Morselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fulvia Furinghetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furinghetti, F., Morselli, F. Beliefs and beyond: hows and whys in the teaching of proof. ZDM Mathematics Education 43, 587–599 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0316-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0316-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation