Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quels sont les facteurs psychosociaux déterminant la participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal ? Intérêt de la théorie du comportement planifié et du concept de coping

What are the psychosocial determinants of participating in screening for colorectal cancer? Interest of the theory of planned behavior and adaptation of the concept of coping

  • Article Original / Original Article
  • Published:
Psycho-Oncologie

Résumé

Objectif

Identifier les déterminants de l’adhésion au dépistage du cancer colorectal (CCR) en se fondant sur la théorie du comportement planifié (TCP) et le concept de coping.

Matériel et méthodes

Les attitudes, les normes sociales, le contrôle perçu, le coping et l’intention de se faire dépister ont été évalués auprès de 132 participants âgés de 50 à 74 ans.

Résultats

L’intention est prédite par les antécédents de dépistage, des attitudes favorables, les normes sociales et le coping centré sur le problème.

Conclusion

Ces résultats apportent des pistes d’actions pour améliorer le dépistage.

Abstract

Aim

Identify the determinants of colorectal cancer screening adherence based on the theory of planned behavior and the concept of coping.

Material and methods

Attitudes, social norms, perceived control, coping and intention to be tested were evaluated with 132 participants aged 50 to 74 years.

Results

The intention is predicted by screening past behaviors, positive attitudes, social norms, and problem-focused coping.

Conclusion

These results provide indications to improve screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Haute Autorité de santé (2013) Dépistage et prévention du cancer colorectal: actualisation du référentiel de pratiques de l’examen périodique de santé (EPS)

  2. Varela A, Jandorf L, Duhamel K (2010) Understanding factors related to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among urban Hispanics: use of focus group methodology. J Cancer Educ 25:70–5

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clavarino A, Janda M, Hughes K, et al (2004) The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT. Prev Med 39:482–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia AZG (2012) Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening participation. Gastroenterol Res Pract–http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/483417

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weitzman E, Zapka J, Estabrook B, et al (2001) Risk and reluctance: understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 32:502–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones R, Devers K, Kuzel AW, et al (2010) Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med 38:508–16

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bridou M (2012) Étude des principaux freins et leviers psychologiques envers l’examen de dépistage du cancer colorectal: le rôle particulier de l’anxiété envers la santé dans l’adoption de cette démarche. (Thèse de doctorat en psychologie, université François-Rabelais de Tours, Tours)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kudadjie-Gyamfi E, Magai C (2008) The influence of coping styles on mammography screening in a multiethnic sample. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 14:183–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooke R, French, DP (2008) How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. Psychol Health 23:745–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McEvoy-Devellis S, Blalock SJ, Sandler RS (2006) Predicting participation in cancer screening: the role of perceived behavioral control. J Appl Soc Psychol 20:639–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sieverding M, Matterne U, Ciccarello L (2010) What role do social norms play in the context of men’s cancer screening intention and behavior? Application of an extended theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol 29:72–81

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology Press (Appendix: constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire), New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, et al (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. A manual for health services researchers–http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/1735

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Fernandez ME (2013) Understanding Cervical Cancer Screening Intentions among Latinas Using An Expanded Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Behav Med 39:66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauerle-Bass S, Gordon T, Burt-Ruzek S, et al (2011) Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening in urban African American clinic patients: differences by gender and screening status. J Cancer Educ 26:121–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Norman P, Conner M (1996) Predicting health-check attendance among prior attenders and non-attenders: the role of prior behavior in the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 26:1010–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berglund G, Nilsson S, Nordin K (2005) Intention to test for prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:990–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hahm MI, Choi KS, Kye SY, et al (2007) Factors influencing the intention to have stomach cancer screening. J Prev Med Public Health/Yebang Uihakhoe Chi 40:205–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheeran P (2002) Intention–Behavior Relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 12:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodman M, Ogdie A, Kanamori M, et al (2006) Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among mid-atlantic Latinos: Focus group findings. Ethn Dis 16:255–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz M, Heaner S, Reiter P, et al (2009) Development of an educational video to improve patient knowledge and communication with their healthcare providers about colorectal cancer screening. Am J Health Educ 40:220–8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Neter E, Stein N, Barnett-Griness O, et al (2014) From the bench to public health. Population-level implementation intentions in colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 46:273–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Epsylon EA4556, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Route de Mende, F-34199, Montpellier cedex 5, France

    A. Le Bonniec & F. Cousson-Gélie

  2. Epidaure, Pôle Prévention de l’Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, F-34000, Montpellier, France

    A. Le Bonniec, K. Djoufelkit & F. Cousson-Gélie

Authors
  1. A. Le Bonniec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Djoufelkit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Cousson-Gélie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Le Bonniec.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonniec, A.L., Djoufelkit, K. & Cousson-Gélie, F. Quels sont les facteurs psychosociaux déterminant la participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal ? Intérêt de la théorie du comportement planifié et du concept de coping. Psycho Oncologie 9, 108–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-015-0522-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-015-0522-6

Mots clés

Keywords

Search

Navigation