Abstract
Scale Metabolic Models (GEMs) emerged as a formal concept to describe metabolic pathways reconstructed from the information present in the genome of living systems as well as in the biochemical reactions described in the literature. This formalization involves steps including determination of their stoichiometry and definition of model constraints. Genome Scale Metabolic Models (GEMs) are mathematically structured knowledge that can be used to generate and test biological hypotheses when integrated with experimental data. Recently the community started to recognize the potential of GEMS and their analysis with constraint-based modeling. Therefore, when using GEMs for applications including in silico metabolic engineering, it´s important to understand the assumption behind its mathematical framework, but usually the theory behind is not accessible to a broad audience in one place. This work aims to present a concise theoretical and practical introduction to GEMS that is accessible to a broad audience getting them closer to the use and applications of GEMS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edwards JS, Palsson BO (1999) Systems properties of the Haemophilus influenzae Rd metabolic genotype. J Biol Chem 274(25):17410–17416
Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B, Stevens RL (2010) High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol 28(9):977–982
Kim B, Kim WJ, Kim DI, Lee SY (2015) Applications of genome-scale metabolic network model in metabolic engineering. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42:339–348
McCloskey D, Palsson BØ, Feist AM (2013) Basic and applied uses of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions of Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 9(1):661
Blazier AS, Papin JA (2012) Integration of expression data in genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions. Front Physiol 3:299
Liu L, Chen J (2010) Reconstruction and application of genome-scale metabolic network model. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 26(9):1176–1186
Occhipinti R, Puchowicz MA, Lamanna JC, Somersalo E, Calvetti D (2007) Statistical analysis of metabolic pathways of brain metabolism at steady state. Ann Biomed Eng 35(6):886–902
Resendis-Antonio O (2009) Filling kinetic gaps: dynamic modeling of metabolism where detailed kinetic information is lacking”. PLoS One 4(3):e4967
Distefano S, Liudong X (2006) A new approach to modeling the system reliability: dynamic reliability block diagrams. In: Proceedings—annual reliability and maintainability symposium, pp 189–195
Vargas FA, Pizarro F, Pérez-Correa JR, Agosin E (2011) Expanding a dynamic flux balance model of yeast fermentation to genome-scale. BMC Syst Biol 5:75
Becker SA, Feist AM, Palsson BØ (2007) Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox. Nat Protoc 2(3):727–738
Schellenberger J et al (2011) Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc 6(9):1290–1307
Martins-de-Souza D et al (2015) The protein interactome of collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP2/DPYSL2) reveals novel partner proteins in brain tissue. Proteom Clin Appl 9(9–10):817–831
Amaral AI, Teixeira AP, Håkonsen BI, Sonnewald U, Alves PM (2011) A comprehensive metabolic profile of cultured astrocytes using isotopic transient metabolic flux analysis and C-labeled glucose. Front Neuroenerg 3:5
Ben Achour S, Pascual O (2012) Astrocyte-neuron communication: functional consequences. Neurochem Res 37(11):2464–2473
Wade JJ, McDaid LJ, Harkin J, Crunelli V, Kelso JAS (2011) Bidirectional coupling between astrocytes and neurons mediates learning and dynamic coordination in the brain: a multiple modeling approach. PLoS One 6(12):e29445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029445
Occhipinti R, Somersalo E, Calvetti D (2010) Energetics of inhibition: insights with a computational model of the human GABAergic neuron–astrocyte cellular complex. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30(10):1834–1846
Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2013) Quantitative in silico analysis of neurotransmitter pathways under steady state conditions. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4:137
Lewis NE et al (2010) Large-scale in silico modeling of metabolic interactions between cell types in the human brain. Nat Biotechnol 28(12):1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1711
Kalantari E, Saadi FH, Asgari M, Shariftabrizi A, Roudi R, Madjd Z (2016) Increased expression of ALDH1A1 in prostate cancer is correlated with tumor aggressiveness: a tissue microarray study of Iranian patients. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 0(0):1–7
Pinto F, Medina DA, Pérez-Correa JR, Garrido D (2017) Modeling metabolic interactions in a consortium of the infant gut microbiome”. Front Microbiol 8:2507
Blazeck J, Alper H (2010) Systems metabolic engineering: genome-scale models and beyond. Biotechnol J 5(7):647–659
Monk J, Nogales J, Palsson BO (2014) Optimizing genome-scale network reconstructions. Nat Biotechnol 32(5):447–452
Kim TY, Sohn SB, Bin Kim Y, Kim WJ, Lee SY (2012) Recent advances in reconstruction and applications of genome-scale metabolic models. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23(4):617–623
Maarleveld TR, Khandelwal RA, Olivier BG, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ (2013) Basic concepts and principles of stoichiometric modeling of metabolic networks. Biotechnol J 8(9):997–1008
Logsdon BA, Mezey J (2010) Gene expression network reconstruction by convex feature selection when incorporating genetic perturbations. PLoS Comput Biol 6(12):e1001014
Najafi A, Bidkhori G, Bozorgmehr JH, Koch I, Masoudi-Nejad A (2014) Genome scale modeling in systems biology: algorithms and resources. Curr Genom 15(2):130–159
Palsson B (2006) Finding functional states. In: Systems biology: properties of reconstructed networks. Cambridge University Press, pp 244–264
Sauro H (2014) Systems biology: linear algebra for pathway modeling. Ambrosius Publishing, Leipzig
Di Stefano J (2013) Dynamic systems biology modeling and simulation, 1st edn. Academic Press, Cambridge. ISBN 9780124104112
Pfeiffer T et al (1999) METATOOL: for studying metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 15(3):251–257
Liebermeister W, Klipp E (2006) Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints. Theor Biol Med Model 3:41
Schuster S, Fell DA, Dandekar T (2000) A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat Biotechnol 18(3):326–332
Xavier D, Vázquez S, Higuera C, Morán F, Montero F (2011) Tools-4-Metatool (T4M): online suite of web-tools to process stoichiometric network analysis data from Metatool. BioSystems 105(2):169–172
Burgard AP, Maranas CD (2003) Optimization-based framework for inferring and testing hypothesized metabolic objective functions. Biotechnol Bioeng 82(6):670–677
Agutter PS (2005) Review of ‘systems biology in practice’ by Edda Klipp, Ralf Hertwig, Axel Kowald, Christoph Wierling and Hans Lehrach. Theor Biol Med Model 2(1):34
Duarte NC, Becker SA, Jamshidi N et al (2007) Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(6):1777–1782
Li YX, Rinzel J (1994) Equations for InsP3 receptor-mediated [Ca2+]i oscillations derived from a detailed kinetic model: a Hodgkin–Huxley like formalism. J Theor Biol 166:461–473
Calvetti D, Somersalo E (2012) Ménage à trois: the role of neurotransmitters in the energy metabolism of astrocytes, glutamatergic, and GABAergic neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32:1472–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.31
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Universidad San Buenaventura (Engineering faculty) and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Grants 7740, 7714 and 7425 to J. González.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pinzon, W., Vega, H., Gonzalez, J. et al. Mathematical Framework Behind the Reconstruction and Analysis of Genome Scale Metabolic Models. Arch Computat Methods Eng 26, 1593–1606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9290-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9290-3