Pest trap and natural enemy nursery merged in Lobularia maritima

Planting crops to push or pull pests from a main crop and floral enhancements to attract natural enemies are emerging as pivotal agroecological strategies to shift away from synthetic pesticides. The brassica, Lobularia maritima, has great potential to act as a floral enhancement as it is attractive to many insects and improves the fitness of and biocontrol services provided by multiple natural enemies. It has been mainly deployed as an insectary plant; few studies have been conducted on its use as a trap plant. We explored the potential of L. maritima as a targeted flower enhancement in sheltered cropping systems through three case studies: (1) as flower strips alongside a cucumber crop, (2) as flower strips alongside a strawberry crop in a replicated on-farm experiment, and (3) as hanging pots under strawberry cultivation gutters. We monitored beneficial and pest insects in flowers and crops and assessed crop damage. Lobularia maritima stands out as an excellent floral enhancement plant due to its ease of cultivation and its ability to flower consistently over an extended period. Generalist predatory bugs, such as Orius laevigatus and Macrolophus pygmaeus , had higher densities on L. maritima than on other flowers grown next to strawberries. We found more thrips on L. maritima and less thrips on crops in two out of three experiments, compared with controls. Further research is needed to confirm if L. maritima is an effective trap crop for thrips and other pests and to detect possible dis-services, such as the attraction of phytophagous bugs.


Introduction
Trap cropping and floral enhancements emerge as a pivotal agroecological strategy facilitating the shift away from synthetic pesticides, underscoring its significance in sustainable agricultural practices (Albrecht et al. 2020).This approach offers a multifaceted solution, targeting various ecosystem services and dis-services simultaneously, thereby addressing complex ecological dynamics (Sutter et al. 2018).Importantly, it is crucial to recognize that these ecosystem services are interconnected rather than independent entities, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches in agroecological management (Sutter 2016).Selecting appropriate plant species for floral enhancement programs becomes paramount, especially considering the specific requirements of target insect species and the desired outcomes, whether conservation or biological control (Sutter et al. 2017).Thus, understanding the intricate relationships between plant species, insect communities, and ecosystem services is fundamental in effectively harnessing the potential of floral enhancement strategies for sustainable agriculture.
The same plant species can have different effects on biological pest control depending in which cropping system it is deployed."A flowering plant which attracts and possibly maintains, with its nectar and pollen resources, a population of natural enemies which contribute to biological pest management on crops" is an insectary plant (Parolin et al. 2012a).By providing suitable conditions for their establishment and reproduction, it acts as a nursery plant for beneficials.An insectary plant has a direct positive effect on natural enemies, which in turn reduce pest density.As a result, an insectary plant has an indirect positive effect on the main crop (Parolin et al. 2012b).A plant species that serves as an insectary plant for a natural enemy can also be a trap plant for an arthropod pest.Trap plants "attract insects or other organisms like nematodes to protect target crops from pest attack, preventing the pests from reaching the crop or concentrating them in a certain part of the field where they can be economically destroyed" (Shelton and Badenes-Perez 2006).Target pests have a direct negative effect on the trap plant, which results in an indirect positive effect of the latter on the main crop (Parolin et al. 2012b).Finding floral species that encompass several categories of secondary plants in the same growing system could boost biological control while reducing the workload and complexity.
Lobularia maritima L. Desv.(Brassicaceae), also known as sweet alyssum, is an annual or short-lived perennial herbaceous plant native to the Mediterranean region (Picó and Retana 2003).This low, spreading plant grows up to 30 cm high and has narrow, lanceolate leaves arranged in rosettes.Its inflorescences are initially umbelliform, then elongate into multiflora clusters composed of white or purple-petalled flowers (Lauber et al. 2009).Lobularia maritima grows best in sandy, well-drained soil and needs moderate watering (Henson et al. 2006;Landolt and Bäumler 2010).It has been widely cultivated as an ornamental plant and features multiple properties for flower enhancement in agriculture.
Its ability to attract beneficial insects and improve biological control makes L. maritima as a potential trap plant a useful tool for integrated pest management strategies.
Mainly used as an insectary plant, L. maritima also has potential as a trap plant, attracting and retaining target pests, thereby reducing crop damage and yield losses (Tiwari et al. 2020;Arnó et al. 2021;Silva et al. 2022).However, this potential use has been poorly researched and further investigation is needed to fully understand and optimize it in various cropping systems.
The aim of this study is to explore the potential of L. maritima as a targeted flower enhancement for sheltered crops in different settings and, more specifically, to show its attractiveness to pests and beneficials in relation to the main crop.We conducted three case studies: (1) to assess the attractiveness of several flowering species, including L. maritima, to cucumber pests and their natural enemies, as well as associated effects on pest control and crop damage when sown alongside a greenhouse cucumber crop; (2) to evaluate these same parameters focusing on thrips and phytophagous bugs in a tunnel strawberry production system; and (3) to explore the influence of L. maritima in hanging pots under an off-ground strawberry crop on the control of thrips and phytophagous bugs.

Flower strip next to greenhouse cucumbers
The first case study was conducted from March to October 2022 in the facilities of Agroscope in Conthey (Valais, Switzerland).Two crop cycles of ungrafted single-stemmed cucumber plants cv.Pradera F1 (Rijk Zwann, Netherlands) were cultivated in two identical open-ground greenhouses (350 m 2 , no insect-proof netting on the openings).The first and the second crop cycles were planted in weeks 14 and 28, respectively, and grown for 12 weeks each using a high-wire system.Seven 23-m-long rows were set up in the reference greenhouse (0.45 m between plants, 1.7 m between rows).In the test greenhouse, the cucumber row furthest away from the reference greenhouse was replaced by a flower strip which was sown during week 12.
The flower strip was divided into three parts from north to south.A mix of six flowering species was sown in the northern and southern plots (1 m × 7.5 m), and singlespecies plots were sown in the mid-Sect.(6 × 1 m 2 ).The six flowering species were Calendula officinalis L. (Asteraceae), Centaurea cyanus L. (Asteraceae), Coriandrum sativum L. (Apiaceae), Fagopyrum esculentum Moench (Polygonaceae), L. maritima (Brassicaceae) and Vicia sativa L. (Fabaceae).The mixed plots remained in place for the duration of the two crop cycles.Single-species plots were removed in week 28 and replaced by a mix of six species sown in week 29 (Fig. 1).The same mix of species was used, except for V. sativa, which was replaced by Medicago sativa L. (Fabaceae).The proportion of each species in the new mix was adjusted based on observations made in the first mix (Supplementary Information (SI) Table S1).
Two separate drip irrigation systems were installed in the cucumber crop (UNIRAM CNL 16010, 2.3 l/h, 0.3 m between drip holes, two pipes per plant row) and in the flower strip (T-tape 150 TSX, 5 l/h, 0.2 m between drip holes, four rows of pipes spaced 0.2 m apart).Only the cucumber crop was fertilized, and the drip system was disinfected between the two cucumber crop cycles.No insecticides were applied during the two cucumber cycles.Three fungicide treatments were applied in the first crop cycle: Armicarb® (Stähler, 0.3%) against powdery mildew and Airone® WG (Andermatt Biocontrol, 0.3%) against leaf mould during week 16 and Amistar® (Stähler, 0.1%) against cucurbit scab during week 17.In the second crop cycle, five fungicide treatments were applied: Airone® WG (Andermatt Biocontrol, 0.3%) against downy mildew once during week 32, Amistar® (Stähler, 0.1%) against downy mildew twice during week 33 and Armicarb® (Stähler, 0.3%) against powdery mildew once during weeks 35 and 36.
Pests, natural enemies and inflorescences were monitored weekly in the flower strip.During the first cucumber crop cycle, data were collected in each single-species plot and in three predefined 1 m 2 patches per mixed flower plot.During the second cucumber crop cycle, a single predefined 1 m 2 patch per mixed plot was sampled.Insects were counted visually on ten leaves per flowering species in each 1 m 2 patch, and each plant species was shaken ten times over a white tray to count thrips.In case of doubt about the identification of a species, a sample was taken back to the laboratory for examination under binoculars.
In addition, the total number of inflorescences per species was recorded in each patch.Pests and natural enemies were monitored weekly in the crop.Insects were counted on six plants per row in every other row.One leaf at the top, middle and bottom of each plant was sampled.Insect damage on the crop was assessed twice a week at harvest in 18 plots per greenhouse.The crop line replacing the flower strip in the control greenhouse was left out of this assessment.All cucumbers weighing between 350 and 500g were harvested and sorted.They were then visually inspected and sorted into three categories: marketable cucumbers, cucumbers with insect damage and others (e.g.natural curvature greater than 20mm per 10cm length).

Flower strip next to covered strawberries in a replicated on-farm experiment
The second case study was conducted from March to October 2021 in four commercial off-ground strawberry crops located between Conthey and Martigny (Valais, Switzerland).Everbearing strawberries cv.Vivara (Salvi Vivai, Italy) were planted in substrate bags (Pro-Mix GBX, Premier Tech, Canada) placed under plastic tunnels.Irrigation and fertilization were carried out using a drip system.A flower strip was sown next to each of the four tunnel groups.Crop and flower strip features varied between plots (Table 1).
Pests and natural enemies were monitored weekly in the flower strips from week 23 to 32 (in all plots).Samples were collected by aspiration (ecoVac -Insektensauger, ecoTech Umwelt-Messsysteme GmbH) of ten linear metres per flowering species with the nozzle at vegetation level.Each sample was cooled, transferred into a labelled bag and frozen.Insects were then identified and counted under a binocular.
Pest and natural enemies were monitored weekly in the crop from week 24 to 35 (in plots 1 to 3; no data collection in weeks 26, 33 and 34).Insects were collected by shaking one flower spike on each of 40 strawberry plants next to the flower strip and 40 others located 20 m from it.The number of flowers per spike was counted at each sampling round and used to calculate the number of insects per flower.In addition, the percentage of fruit with visible thrips or bug damage was assessed weekly from week 23 to 36 (in plots 1 to 3).

Potted L. maritima in covered strawberries
The third case study was conducted from March to August 2022 in a commercial off-ground strawberry crop in Saxon (Valais, Switzerland).In March, everbearing strawberries cv.Vivara (Salvi Vivai) were planted in substrate bags (Pro-Mix GBX, Premier Tech) placed under two identical plastic tunnels (400 m 2 ).Four 50-m-long rows (8 plants per linear metre) were set up in each tunnel.Irrigation and fertilization were carried out using a drip system.
The two following treatments were compared: (1) strawberry plants above hanging pots of L. maritima; and (2) strawberry plants only (control).Each tunnel was divided into three parts (separated by buffer zones) where three replicates of each treatment were set up alternately.Lobularia maritima was sown in 60 × 17 × 14 cm 3 white pots (50 seeds/pot) in week 9.The pots were fastened with two  wires to the gutters supporting the strawberry crop (1 pot for two linear metres) in week 14 (Fig. 2).Irrigation was carried out using a drip system.Pest and natural enemies were monitored weekly in L. maritima and in the crop from week 17 to 33.Insects were collected by shaking one flower spike on each of 28 L. maritima plants and/or 28 strawberry plants in each repetition of both treatments.In addition, the number of flowers per spike was counted at each sampling round, and the percentage of fruit with visible thrips or bug damage was assessed at each harvest.

Data analysis
The experiment conducted in 2021 in sheltered cucumbers consisted in the comparison of two greenhouses managed differently (i.e.flower strip treatment in one greenhouse vs. no intervention in the other).Similarly, the experiment conducted in 2022 in sheltered strawberries consisted in the comparison between six plots with different management methods (i.e. three plots with potted L. maritima vs. three plots with no intervention).There is no true statistical replication in these experiments.Further, although we conducted a replicated on-farm trial in sheltered strawberries in 2021, the limited number of replicates results in small statistical power.For these reasons, we preferred presenting the mean differences (with standard error where possible), instead of presenting non-parametric mean comparison with p-values, leading to potentially misleading conclusions.

Flowering period of L. maritima compared with six other floral species
Lobularia maritima started to flower approximately one month after sowing and produced inflorescences continuously throughout both cucumber crop cycles (Fig. 3).It represented 81.2% of all inflorescences recorded in the flower strip.Fagopyrum esculentum flowered earliest, three weeks after sowing.Flowering peaked for three weeks and then rapidly decreased with no flowering during the second cucumber crop cycle.Fagopyrum esculentum produced 15.2% of all inflorescences in the flower strip.Calendula officinalis started to flower eight weeks after sowing and continued to do so for the rest of the cucumber crop cycles.It represented 3% of the total number of inflorescences counted in the flower strip.Coriandrum sativum produced a small number of flowers in weeks 9 to 11, corresponding to just 0.6% of all inflorescences.Centaurea cyanus and V. sativa developed poorly with negligible flowering.
In the new mixed plot sown in week 29 at the beginning of the second cucumber crop cycle, L. maritima began to flower 5 weeks after sowing (Fig. 4).As in the first mixed plots, flowering was continuous throughout the crop but L. maritima produced only 8.7% of the total number of inflorescences.Again, F. esculentum flowered earliest at four weeks after sowing.Flowering peaked for four weeks and then rapidly declined.No flowers were recorded on any of the other plant species during the second cucumber crop cycle.

Attractiveness of L. maritima to pests and natural enemies compared with six other floral species
In the flower strip next to the greenhouse cucumbers, L. maritima attracted the most insects during both crop cycles, i.e. 25.4% and 31.4% of all insects recorded, respectively (Fig. 5).Twenty to 350 times more thrips were recorded on L. maritima than on other plant species.In contrast, it attracted up to 22 times less aphids than other plant species and a negligible number of pest mites.In the second cucumber crop cycle, the phytophagous bug, Lygus rugulipennis Poppius (Heteroptera: Miridae), was observed on both L. maritima and C. officinalis, with a stronger presence on the first flowering species.
Few natural enemies were found in the flower strip during the first cucumber crop cycle.Calendula officinalis attracted the most individuals, in particular A. colemani.Larger populations were observed in the flower strip during the second crop cycle.Lobularia maritima and C. officinalis were the most attractive species to beneficial insects, accounting for 60.5% and 25.8% of all individuals, respectively.Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae) was found on both species.However, more than twice as many individuals were found on L. maritima as on C. officinalis.Lobularia maritima also attracted O. laevigatus, which was not found on any other flowering species.
As in the cucumber experiment, L. maritima was the most attractive species for insects in the flower strip next to covered strawberries (Fig. 6).It accounted for 39.7% of all the individuals recorded in the flower strip, exceeding the 12 species mix on which 25.9% of insects were observed.Lobularia maritima attracted 1.7 to 3.1 times more thrips and 1.2-3.3times more phytophagous bugs than other flowering species.Lygus rugulipennis was the most prevalent species of phytophagous bugs.

Effect of floral enhancement measures on population densities of pests and natural enemies in cucumber and strawberry crops
In the first cucumber crop cycle, equally low numbers of pests and natural enemies were observed in the crop grown next to the flower strip as in the reference crop (Fig. 7).The main pests present in the crop were whiteflies, thrips, pest mites and aphids.Thrips represented the greatest risk of direct harvest losses, while aphids and whiteflies were more likely to transmit viruses and indirectly affect yield via plant vigour.Among natural enemies, Amblyseius spp.were the most prevalent.
In the second cucumber crop cycle, pest and natural enemy populations recorded in the reference crop were 3.4 and 4.3 times larger, respectively, than in the crop next to the flower strip.The main differences between the two treatments were observed in the numbers of aphids and A. colemani.Populations of aphids and parasitoid wasps were reduced by 93% and 99%, respectively, in the cucumbers grown next to the flower strip compared to the reference crop.Thrips populations decreased by 32% in the cucumbers next to the flower strip compared to the reference crop.
Similarly, the number of thrips per strawberry flower decreased by 31% in the strawberry rows next to the flower strip compared with rows 20 m away from it (Fig. 8).Similar numbers of L. rugulipennis and O. laevigatus were found at both distances.
In the experiment carried out in 2022 with potted L. maritima under off-ground strawberries, no difference in thrips and phytophagous bug populations was found between those plots with and those without flower enhancement.

Effect of floral enhancement measures on crop damage in cucumbers and strawberries
Similar percentages of crop damage were found in both the greenhouses with and without flower strips during the first cucumber crop cycle (Fig. 9A, B).In contrast, twice as much damage was measured in the greenhouse with the flower strip as in the reference greenhouse during the second crop cycle.
Comparable percentages of strawberries damaged by thrips were observed next to and 20 m from the flower strip in covered strawberries (Fig. 9C, D).Damage caused by tarnished plant bugs tended to be lower in strawberry plants grown next to the flower strip than in those 20 m away.
In the 2022 case study, lower thrips damage was recorded in strawberry plants above suspended pots of L. maritima than in the control plots.On average over the season, the number of strawberries damaged by thrips was reduced by 50% in plots with L. maritima (Fig. 10).Damage reduction Fig. 7 Cumulative number of pests and natural enemies (Nat.en.) per plant in the crop recorded in 2021 during the first (A) and second (B) cucumber crop cycles varied from 3 to 84% in the different sampling rounds.In contrast, 44% more strawberries with damage caused by tarnished plant bugs were found in the plots with L. maritima than in the control.

Discussion
This research illustrates the potential of L. maritima as a targeted flower enhancement in sheltered crops.This flowering species was found to be well adapted and practical for greenhouse and tunnel cultivation.It was suitable for soil and pot growing and performed well in both conditions.
Lobularia maritima attracted many insects and has a high potential in integrated management of thrips in strawberries.However, a potential increase in phytophagous bug populations and crop damage needs to be considered in future research.
In line with previous results (Picó and Retana 2003;Irvin et al. 2021), L. maritima grown next to the greenhouse cucumber crop had an early, extended and uninterrupted flowering period.It had the longest and most abundant flowering of all the tested plant species, comprising more than 80% of all the recorded inflorescences.Blooming started four weeks after sowing and continued for more than five months thereafter.At the last monitoring, L. maritima was still producing more than 300 inflorescences per m 2 .Fagopyrum esculentum, another common insectary plant, started flowering a week earlier than L. maritima, but only for a short period of about five weeks.This species had to be reseeded to obtain new flowers during the season.However, it rapidly developed after the summer sowing and started flowering within four weeks.In contrast, C. officinalis began to flower one month after L. maritima but bloomed continuously thereafter.In a previous study, seed germination of L. maritima peaked at 10°C and progressively decreased at both higher and lower temperatures (Picó and Retana 2003).Consistent with this, L. maritima established and flowered more rapidly after spring sowing when temperatures were lower than after summer sowing.Therefore, we recommend sowing it under greenhouse early in spring or possibly in autumn (provided the infrastructure is kept frost-free during the winter) to ensure an optimal development.
Due to its long flowering period, L. maritima provided pollen and nectar throughout the growing season.It attracted the highest number of insects amongst all the flowering species tested alongside cucumbers and strawberries.However, natural enemies were slow to colonize it in our cucumber case study.Only a few predatory mites were recorded in L. maritima during the first crop cycle and the flower strip had no effect on the presence of pests and natural enemies in the crop.It took until the second crop cycle to observe larger populations of generalist predatory bugs and a strongly reduced presence of pests in the crop next to the flower strip compared to the reference greenhouse.This reduction was mainly due to a decreased number of aphids, which either migrated to the flower strip or were controlled by natural enemies.As a result, populations of A. colemani also strongly decreased in the crop.
Interestingly, the flower strip boosted the presence of M. pygmaeus in the crop although this mirid predator was previously found to be unable to maintain itself on cucumber plants (Perdikis and Lykouressis 2003).Calendula officinalis is known as a natural host of this zoophytophagous species (Ingegno et al. 2011) and used as a banker plant to foster its establishment and biocontrol services in tomato greenhouses (Ardanuy et al. 2022).Consistent with this, M. pygmaeus moved from the adjacent tomato greenhouse and naturally colonized C. officinalis in our cucumber case study.However, we recorded twice as many individuals of this species on L. maritima, highlighting the latter's potential as a banker plant for M. pygmaeus.Further research should be conducted to assess if growing L. maritima alongside various crops proves beneficial to M. pygmaeus and increases its biocontrol services.This would be useful as this generalist predator feeds on multiple pests such as whiteflies, spider mites, thrips and moths.
Another positive trait of L. maritima recorded in both case studies carried out in 2021 is its high attractiveness for O. laevigatus.Higher densities of this predatory bug were recorded on L. maritima than on all the other floral species tested.Bennison et al. (2011) mentioned L. maritima's potential use as a combined trap plant for the Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and banker plant to promote the predatory bug O. laevigatus.No such dual effect of L. maritima could be demonstrated in the present case studies, however this should be further researched as it would be ideal for optimizing thrips control.In another experiment, the presence of L. maritima in a strawberry cropping system positively influenced the population growth of the predatory bug and the biocontrol services it provided against aphids (Zuma et al. 2023).In our cucumber case study, the higher density of O. laevigatus may have contributed to reducing aphid pressure during the second crop cycle.
Despite a strong reduction in pest populations in the second cucumber crop cycle, insect crop damage was twice as high next to the flower strip as in the reference greenhouse.Although L. rugulipennis was not directly recorded in the crop (probably due to its high mobility), most of the additional damage was caused by this pest.In the flower strip, the phytophagous bug was mainly found on L. maritima, highlighting the importance of considering possible disservices in future assessments of this flowering species.For example, twice as many tarnished plant bugs were found in flowered strips composed of L. maritima as in mown border strips set up along an asparagus crop (Buchanan et al. 2018).Miridae were reported to be attracted to L. maritima and larger populations of homopteran pests were recorded in the inter-rows of an organic vineyard when this floral species was sown (Burgio et al. 2016).Further, Köneke et al. (2023) reported L. maritima to cause an increase of flea beetle infestation when intercropped with cabbage.Contrarily to the results of the cucumber case study, damage caused by tarnished plant bugs tended to be lower in strawberries next to the flower strip as in those 20 m from it.Regarding thrips, approximately one third fewer individuals were found on cucumber plants next to the flower strip as in the reference greenhouse.A similar reduction was observed between strawberries grown next to the flower strip and those 20 m from it.However, there was no effect of the flower strips on thrips damage in the crops grown in 2021.As both flower strips were composed of several species, the contribution of L. maritima to this result remains to be determined.
Finally, the results of the case study carried out in 2022 provide some insights into its use for the management of thrips, possibly as a trap crop.While similar thrips populations were recorded on strawberry plants grown above hanging pots of L. maritima as in control plots, thrips damage was halved in flowered plots.We assume that L. maritima is a trap plant for thrips, as previously reported by Bennison et al. (2011), and that its position in the crop plays a key role in reducing crop damage.In our case study, L. maritima was grown in hanging pots below the cultivation gutters.We postulate that winged adult thrips preferred potted L. maritima to strawberry plants for oviposition and that the young non-winged larvae, which cause the most damage, were then unable or unwilling to climb back onto the crop.These results should be considered carefully, as they are based on observations only and thrips pressure was relatively low in 2022.However, this is the first time to our knowledge that such a phenomenon has been reported.
We believe that L. maritima has great potential as a multifunctional companion plant and that further investigations are necessary to reveal it.These should include considerations on the optimal position (i.e.potted vs. in-ground plants, connected vs. disconnected from the main crop) and density of this floral species in the main crop.Various combinations of L. maritima with other flowering plants could also be tested in order to mitigate potential dis-services, such as the attraction of tarnished plant bugs to the main crop.Further experiments should also aim to prove the attractiveness of L. maritima to predatory bugs and the usefulness of this property in different cropping systems (e.g.biocontrol services of M. pygmaeus on crops other than tomatoes).

Conclusions
We illustrated the potential of L. maritima for flower enhancement in sheltered crops and postulated its possible applications for biological control of thrips.Lobularia maritima is a flowering species with many advantages.It is easy to grow, performs well in pots and in open ground, and is suitable for open-field and covered cultivation.Lobularia maritima has a long and abundant flowering period compared to other floral species, making it attractive to insects, in general.Generalist predatory bugs, such as Orius laevigatus and Macrolophus pygmaeus, had higher densities on L. maritima than on other flowers grown next to the main crop.We found more thrips on L. maritima and less thrips on crops in two out of three experiments, compared with controls.Further research is needed to confirm if L. maritima is an effective trap crop for thrips and other pests and to detect possible dis-services, such as the promotion of phytophagous bugs.We assume that a targeted management of L. maritima in the main crop would make it possible to take advantage of both its attractiveness to natural enemies (parasitoids, predatory bugs) and its properties as a trap plant for thrips.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Footage of the experiment conducted in 2022 in sheltered strawberries with hanging pots of Lobularia maritima under the cultivation gutters

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Average number of inflorescences per species and repetition recorded during the first (April to July) and second (August to October) cucumber crop cycles in the mixed plots sown on 24.03.21 (week 12).No monitoring was carried out between July and August

Fig. 5 Fig. 6
Fig. 5 Cumulative number of pests and natural enemies (Nat.en.) recorded in 2021 in the different species in the flower strip during the first (A) and second (B) cucumber crop cycles.LM Lobularia maritima, FE Fagopyrum esculentum, CO Calendula officinalis, CC Cen-

Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Cumulative number of thrips (A), Lygus rugulipennis (B) and Orius laevigatus (C) per strawberry flower recorded in 2021 in the sheltered strawberry crop.CO strawberry plants 20 m away from the

Fig. 10
Fig. 10 Average percentage of strawberries with damage caused by thrips (A) and tarnished plant bugs (B) recorded in 2022 in the covered strawberry crops.Solid line strawberry plots with potted Lobu-