Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of algal lipid extraction by mixture of ethyl acetate and ethanol via response surface methodology for biodiesel production

  • Energy
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of extraction time, extraction temperature, solvent to biomass ratio and solvent composition on lipid yield from lyophilized Chlorococcum sp. biomass using a mixture of ethyl acetate and ethanol (EAE), a new proposed solvent, were studied. Subsequently, the process conditions of extraction by EAE were optimized using Box-Behnken design (BBD). The results revealed that the extraction temperature had the greatest effect on lipid extraction efficiency, followed by volume ratio of ethyl acetate to ethanol (EA/E) and extraction time. The largest lipid extraction yield of 15.74% was obtained under the following extraction conditions: 40mL solvents per gram of biomass for 270 min with gentle stirring at 80 °C by EAE with an EA/E of 1.0. Furthermore, palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid were the most abundant fatty acids in the lipids extracted, indicating the great potential of the proposed lipid extraction procedure for microalgae-based biodiesel production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Demirbas and M. F. Demirbas, Energy Convers. Manage., 52, 163 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Mofijur, H. H. Masjuki, M. A. Kalam, A. E. Atabani, M. Shahabuddin, S. M. Palash and M. A. Hazrat, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 28, 441 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Haik, M. Y. Selim and T. Abdulrehman, Energy, 36, 1827 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Suganya, M. Varman, H. H. Masjuki and S. Renganathan, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 55, 909 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Huo, Z. Wang, S. Zhu, W. Zhou, R. Dong and Z. Yuan, Bioresour. Technol., 121, 76 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. A. Alam, C. Wan, X. Q. Zhao, L. J. Chen, J. S. Chang and F. W. Bai, J. Hazard. Mater., 289, 38 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. B. Metting, J. Ind. Microbiol., 17, 477 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. P. Caporgno, A. Taleb, M. Olkiewicz, J. Font, J. Pruvost, J. Legrand and C. Bengoa, Algal Res., 10, 232 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Zhao, Y. Su, Y. Zhang and G. Cui, Energy, 89, 347 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. H. Wijffels and M. J. Barbosa, Science, 329, 796 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Chisti, Trends Biotechnol., 26, 126 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Wan, M. A. Alam, X. Q. Zhao, X. Y. Zhang, S. L. Guo, S. H. Ho, J. S. Chang and F. W. Bai, Bioresour. Technol., 184, 251 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Halim, M. K. Danquah and P. A. Webley, Biotechnol. Adv., 30, 709 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Halim, B. Gladman, M. K. Danquah and P. A. Webley, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 178 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. H. Cheng, T. B. Du, H. C. Pi, S. M. Jang, Y. H. Lin and H. T. Lee, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 10151 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Kanda, P. Li, T. Ikehara and M. Yasumoto-Hirose, Fuel, 95, 88 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Lu, Z. Wang and Z Yuan, Bioresour. Technol., 191, 433 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. L. U. Abubakar and A. M. Mutie, J. Appl. Phytotechnol. Environ. Sanit., 1, 147 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Indarti, M. I. A. Majid, R. Hashim and A. Chong, J. Food Compos. Anal., 18, 161 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Y. Gan and A. A. Latiff, Food Chem., 124, 1277 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Tomšik, B. Pavlic, J. Vladic, M. Ramic, J. Brindza and S. Vidovic, Ultrason. Sonochem., 29, 502 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Ryckebosch, K. Muylaert and I. Foubert, J. Am. Oil Chem, Soc., 89, 189 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Shi, J. Yu, J. Pohorly, J. C. Young, M. Bryan and Y. Wu, J. Food Agric. Environ., 1 2, 42 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Meullemiestre, E. Petitcolas, Z. Maache-Rezzoug, F. Chemat and S. A. Rezzoug, Ultrason. Sonochem., 28, 230 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Quanhong and F. Caili, Food Chem., 92, 701 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. G. Bligh and W. J. Dyer, Canadian J. Biochem. Physiol., 37, 911 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongming Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, W., Alam, M.A., Pan, Y. et al. Optimization of algal lipid extraction by mixture of ethyl acetate and ethanol via response surface methodology for biodiesel production. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33, 2575–2581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0101-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0101-y

Keywords

Navigation