Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptation of real earthquake records for their reproduction by a shaking table with limited stroke

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shaking tables with moving platforms are widely used in laboratory testing of structural models and full-sized devices. In most cases, the platform’s movement should reproduce real ground acceleration records. However, the stroke of the platform, required for reproduction of real records, is usually rather large. This limitation does not allow an accurate realization of the ground motion by the shaking table. Commonly, in order to overcome this problem, original records are modified, which causes a significant change in the acceleration records’ spectra. That is why structural responses to the original and to the modified records are different. A new method for modification of original acceleration records is proposed, in which the original record is corrected by an additional artificial one that changes the shaking platform’s displacement. The corrected record is obtained as a sequence of impulses. The magnitude and duration of each impulse, as well as their location on the time scale, are obtained by an optimization procedure. The optimization is implemented according to a performance index, aimed to minimize the influence of the correcting acceleration record on the spectrum of the original one. The proposed method has higher reproduction accuracy, compared to other known methods. Its effectiveness is demonstrated by comparison of response spectra and dynamic behaviors of three multi-story structures subjected to natural and modified seismic excitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agranovich G, Blostotsky B and Ribakov Y(2006), “Modeling of Earthquake Excitations in Laboratory Tests of Structures”, 7th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, October 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranovich G, Ribakov Y and Blostotsky B (2007a), “Improved Shaking Table Control Algorithms for Testing of Earthquake Excited Structures,” International Conference on Modern Trends in Structural Engineering for Seismic Design, Ariel, Israel, 8–11 October.

  • Agranovich G, Ribakov Y and Blostotsky B (2007b), “Reproducing Earthquake Records Using Shaking Tables with Limited Displacements”, European Earthquake Engineering, 21(1): 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj SA (2001), “Broad Steps in Earthquake Resistant Design of a Nuclear Power Plant,” An International Journal of Nuclear Power, 15: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blostotsky B, Agranovich G and Ribakov Y (2008). “Developing of a Shaking Table Control Algorithm,” 5th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Venice, 30.06–4.07.

  • Filiatraul A and Matt H (2005), “Experimental Seismic Response of High-Voltage Transformer-bushing Systems,” Earthquake Spectra, 21(4): 1009–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao M, Wu TSY, Chang KC and Lee GC (2007), “Shaking Table Tests of a Scaled Bridge Model with Rolling-type Seismic Isolation Bearings,” Engineering Structure, 29(5): 694–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman AK and Rieger H (2002), “Optimisation Algorithms,” Physics, WILEY-VCH.

  • Ingle VK and Proakis JG (2006), Digital Signal Processing Using MATLAB, Bookware Companion Series.

  • Kim JK, Ryu H and Lee JR (2001), “Shaking Table Test of a Full Scale Model of a Five-story Stone Pagoda”, The Eighth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, 5–7 December 2001, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Paper No. 1201.

  • Kobayashi H and Unioh S (2004), “Development of an Earthquake Damage Detection System for Bridge Structures”, North American Euro-Pacific Workshop on Sensing Issues in Civil Structural Health Monitoring, November 2004. Internet resource http: //www.pwri.go.jp/eng/activity/pdf/reports/kobayashi_and_unjoh041109.pdf.

  • Kusner DA, Rood JD and Burton JW (1992), “Signal Reproduction Fidelity of Servohydraulic Testing Equipment,” Proceedings of 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2683–2688.

  • Lin PY, Roschke PN and Loh CH (2006), “Hybrid Base Isolation with Magnetorheological Damper and Fuzzy Control,” Structural Control and Health Moniotoring, 14(3): 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moncarz PD and Krawinkler H (1981), “Theory and Application of Experimental Model Analysis in Earthquake Engineering,” Report No. 50, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhlenkamp M, Conte JP, Hudgings TR and Durrani AJ (1997) “Analysis, Design, and Construction of a Shaking Table Facility,” Structural Research at Rice, Report No. 46, Department of Civil Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murota N, Feng MQ and Liu GY (2008), “Experimental and Analytical Studies of Base Isolation Systems for Seismic Protection of Power Transformers,” Report No. MCEER-05-0008, Internet resource.

  • Nepote B, Dyke SJ and Caicedo JM (2000), “Implementation of the Transfer Function Iteration Method for the Control of Earthquake Simulators,” Proceedings, Second European Conference on Structural Control, Paris, France, July 3–6.

  • Nishida H and Unjoh S (2004), “Dynamic Response Characteristic of Reinforced Concrete Column Subjected to Bilateral Earthquake Ground Motions,” Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada. http://mceer.buffalo.edu/research/International_Research/NCREE/bridgestone/default.asp.

  • Oppenheim AV and Schafer RW (1989), Discrete-time Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall.

  • SAC Joint Venture Steel Project Phase 2 “Develop Suites of Time Histories”. Project Task:5.4.1. Draft Report, 1997. Internet resource. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/data/strong_motion/sacsteel/draftreport.html.

  • Spencer BF and Yang G (1998), “Earthquake Simulator Control by Transfer Function Iteration,” Proceedings of the 12th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, San Diego, California, May 17–20, 776–769.

  • Thurston J and Gavin H (2002), “Large-scale Shake Table Testing of Semi-active Damping Devices,” Young Researcher Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, June.

  • Trombetti TL, Conte JP and Durrani AJ (1997a), “Analytical Modeling of a Shaking Table System,” Structural Research at Rice, Report No. 48, Department of Civil Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombetti TL, Conte JP and Durrani AJ (1997b). “Correlation Studies Between Analytical and Experimental Dynamic Behavior of the Rice University Shaking Table,” Structural Research at Rice, Report No. 49, Department of Civil Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCIST Shake Table (2000), User’s Manual. Quanser Consulting Inc., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Ribakov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blostotsky, B., Ribakov, Y. & Agranovich, G. Adaptation of real earthquake records for their reproduction by a shaking table with limited stroke. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 9, 493–502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-010-0031-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-010-0031-3

Keywords

Navigation