Abstract
The block operator CMV matrices and their sub-matrices are applied to the description of all solutions to the Schur interpolation problem for contractive analytic operator-valued functions in the unit disk (the Schur class functions).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpay, D.: Algorithme de Schur, espaces a noyau reproduisant et theorie des systemes. (French) Panoramas et Syntheses. 6. Paris: Societe Mathematique de France (1998)
Anderson, W.N.: Shorted operators. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 20, 520–525 (1971)
Anderson, W.N., Trapp, G.E.: Shorted operators II. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 28, 60–71 (1975)
Arlinskiĭ, Yu.: The Kalman-Yakubovich-Popov inequality for passive discrete time-invariant systems. Operators and Matrices 2(1), 15–51 (2008)
Arlinskiĭ, Yu.: Conservative realizations of the functions associated with Schur’s algorithm for the Schur class operator-valued functions. Operators and Matrices. 3(1), 59–96 (2009)
Arlinskiĭ, Yu.: Conservative discrete time-invariant systems and block operator CMV matrices. Methods of Functional Analysis and Topology. 15(3), 201–236 (2009)
Arlinskiĭ, Yu.: Schur parameters, Toeplitz matrices, and Kreĭn shorted operators. Integral Equat. Oper. Theory. 71, 417–453 (2011)
Arlinskiĭ, Yu., Golinskiĭ, L., Tsekanovskiĭ, E.R.: Contractions with rank one defect operators and truncated CMV matrices. Journ. of Funct. Anal. 254, 154–195 (2008)
Arlinskiĭ, Yu.: Truncated Hamburger moment problem for an operator measure with compact support. Mathematische Nachrichten 285(14–15), 1677–1695 (2012)
Arov, D.Z.: Passive linear stationary dynamical systems. Sibirsk. Math. Journ. 20(2), 211–228 (1979). [Russian]. English translation in Siberian Math. Journ., 20, 149–162. (1979)
Arov, D.Z.: Computation of the resolvent matrix for the generalized bitanential Schur and Caratheodory-Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation problems in the strictly completely inderminate case. Integral Equations Operator Theory 22, 253–272 (1995)
Arov, D.Z., Grossman, L.Z.: Scattering matrices in the theory of extensions of isometric operators. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 270, 17–20 (1983) [Russian]. English trans., Soviet Math. Dokl. 27, 518–522 (1983)
Arov, D.Z., Kreĭn, M.G.: On the computation of entropy functionals and their minima in indeterminate extension problems. Acta Sci. Math 45, 33–50 (1983). (Russian)
Bakonyi, M., Constantinescu, T.: Schur’s algorithm and several applications. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, v. 261, Longman Scientific and Technical (1992)
Berezansky, Yu.M., Dudkin, M.: The direct and inverse spectral problems for the block Jacobi matrices. Methods of Functional Analysis and Toplogy 11(4), 327–345 (2005)
Cantero, M.L., Moral, L., Velázquez, L.: Five-diagonal matrices and zeros of orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. Linear Algebra Appl. 362, 29–56 (2003)
Ceausescu, Z., Foias, C.: On intertwining dilations. V. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 40, 9–32 (1978)
Ceausescu, Z., Foias, C.: On intertwining dilations. V. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) Corrections, 41 (1979)
Constantinscu, T.: Operator Schur algorithm and associated functions. Math. Balcanica 2, 244–252 (1988)
Constantinscu, T.: Schur parameters, factorization and dilation problems. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 82. Bikhäuser Verlag, Basel (1996)
Delsarte, Ph., Genin, Y., Kamp, Y.: I. Schur parametrization of positive definite block-Toeplitz systems. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 36(1), 34–46 (1979)
Dubovoj, V.K., Fritzsche, B., Kirstein, B.: Matricial version of the classical Schur problem. Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik [Teubner Texts in Mathematics], 129. B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart (1992)
Dym, H.: \(J\) contractive matrix functions, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and interpolation. Reg. Conf. Ser. Math. 71 (1989)
Foias, C., Frazho, A.E.: The commutant lifting approach to interpolation problems. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 44. Birkhäuser, Basel-Boston-Berlin (1990)
Foias, C., Frazho, A.E., Gohberg, I., Kaashoek, M.A.: Metric constrained interpolation, commutant liffting and systems. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, v. 100, Birkhäuser Basel-Boston-Berlin (1998)
Fritzsche, B., Kirstein, B., Lasarow, A.: The matricial Schur problem in both nondegenerate and degenerate cases. Math. Nachr. 282(2), 180–210 (2009)
Katsnel’son, V.E., Kheifets, A.Ja., Yuditskiĭ, P.M.: An abstract interpolation problem and the theory of extensions of isometric operators. Operators in Fuction Spaces and Problem in Function Theory [Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 83–96 (1987). English translation in Operator Theory: Advances and Appl., 95, 283–298 (1997)
Kheifets, A.Ja.: Parseval equality in abstract interpolation problem and coupling of open systems. Teor. Funktsiĭ, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen 49, 112–120 (1988). [in Russian]. English translation in J. Soviet Math. 49(4), 1114–1120 (1990)
Kheifets, A.Ja.: Parseval equality in abstract interpolation problem and coupling of open systems. Teor. Funktsiĭ, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen 50, 98–103 (1988). [in Russian]. English translation in J. Soviet Math. 49(6), 1307–1310 (1990)
Kheifets, A.: The abstract interpolation problem and applications. Holomorphic spaces. Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., 33, 351–379 (1998). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kheifets, A.: Parametrization of solutions of the Nehari problem and nonorthogonal dynamics. Oper. Theory, Adv. Appl 115, 213–233 (2000)
Kreĭn, M.G.: Theory of selfadjoint extensions of semibounded operators and its applications.I. Mat. Sb. 20(3), 431–498 (1947). [Russian]
Peller, V.: Hankel operators and their applications. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, New York-Berlin-Heidelberg (2003)
Schur, I.: Über Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschränkt sind, I, II. J. Reine Angew. Math. 147, 205–232 (1917). English translation in I. Schur methods in operator theory and signal processing. Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 18, Birkhauser, Basel and, Boston (1986)
Schur, I.: Über Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschränkt sind, I, II. J. Reine Angew. Math. 148, 122–145 (1918). English translation in I. Schur methods in operator theory and signal processing. Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 18, Birkhauser, Basel and, Boston (1986)
Shmul’yan, Yu.L.: Generalized fractional-linear transformations of operator balls. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 21(5), 114–131 (1980) [Russian]. English translation in Siberian Mathematical Jour. 21(5), 728–740 (1980)
Shmul’yan, Yu.L.: Certain stability properties for analytic operator-valued functions. Mat. Zametki 20(4), 511–520 (1976) [Russian]. English translation in. Mathematical Notes 20(4), 843–848 (1976)
Simon, B.: Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. Part 1. Classical theory, Part 2. Spectral theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Providence, RI (2005)
Sz.-Nagy, B., Foias, C.: Harmonic analysis of operators on Hilbert space, North-Holland, New York (1970)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Bernd Kirstein.
Appendix A: Special Cases of Block Operator CMV Matrices
Appendix A: Special Cases of Block Operator CMV Matrices
Let \(\{\Gamma _n\}\) be the Schur parameters of the function \(\Theta \in \mathbf{S}(\mathfrak{M },\mathfrak{N })\). Suppose \(\Gamma _m\) is an isometry (respect., co-isometry, unitary) for some \(m\ge 0\). Then \(\Theta _m(z)=\Gamma _m\) for all \(z\in \mathbb{D }\) and
The function \(\Theta \) is the transfer function of the simple conservative systems constructed by means of its Schur parameters \(\{\Gamma _n\}\) and the corresponding block operator CMV matrices \(\mathcal{U }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0\) [6]. Here we present the explicit form of block operator CMV and truncated CMV matrices. In particular we revise some misprints in [6]. Notice that if \(\Gamma _m\) is isometric (respect., co-isometric), then
-
1.
\(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_n}=\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{m}}, D_{\Gamma ^*_{n}}=I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{m}}}, \Gamma _n=0:\{0\}\rightarrow \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{m}}\) for \(n> m\) (respect., \(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _n}=\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{m}}, D_{\Gamma _{n}}=I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{m}}}, \Gamma _n=0:\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _n}\rightarrow \{0\}\) for \(n> m\));
-
2.
in the definitions of the state spaces \(\mathfrak{H }_0=\mathfrak{H }_0(\{\Gamma _n\}_{n\ge 0})\) and \(\widetilde{\mathfrak{H }}_0=\widetilde{\mathfrak{H }}_0(\{\Gamma _n\}_{n\ge 0})\) we replace \(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _n}\) with \(\{0\}\) (respect., \(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_n}\) with \(\{0\}\)) for \(n\ge m\), and \(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_n}\) by \(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}\) (respect., \(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _n}\) by \(\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}\)) for \(n> m\).
-
3.
the corresponding unitary elementary rotation takes the row (respect., the column) form, i.e,
$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{J}^{(r)}_{\Gamma _0}&= \begin{bmatrix} \Gamma _0&I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_0}} \end{bmatrix}: \begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{M }\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{0}} \end{array}\rightarrow \mathfrak{N }\\&\times \left( {\mathrm{respect}},\;\mathbf{J}^{(c)}_{\Gamma _0}=\begin{bmatrix} \Gamma _0\\D_{\Gamma _0} \end{bmatrix}: \mathfrak{M }\rightarrow \begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{N }\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{0}} \end{array}\right) ,\\ \mathbf{J}^{(r)}_{\Gamma _m}&= \begin{bmatrix} \Gamma _m&I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}} \end{bmatrix}: \begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{m-1}}\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{m}}\end{array} \rightarrow \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{m-1}}\\&\times \left( {\mathrm{respect.}},\; \mathbf{J}^{(c)}_{\Gamma _m}= \begin{bmatrix} \Gamma _m\\D_{\Gamma _m} \end{bmatrix}: \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{m-1}}\rightarrow \begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{m-1}}\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{m}} \end{array}\right) ,\; m\ge 1. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore, in definitions (3.1) of the block diagonal operator matrices
we will replace
-
\(\mathbf{J}_{\Gamma _m}\) by \(\mathbf{J}^{(r)}_{\Gamma _m}\) and \(\mathbf{J}_{\Gamma _n}\) by \(I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}}\) for \(n>m\), when \(\Gamma _m\) is isometry,
-
\(\mathbf{J}_{\Gamma _m}\) by \(\mathbf{J}^{(c)}_{\Gamma _m}\), and \(\mathbf{J}_{\Gamma _n}\) by \(I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}}\) for \(n>m\), when \(\Gamma _m\) is co-isometry,
-
\(\mathbf{J}_{\Gamma _m}\) by \(\Gamma _m\), when \(\Gamma _m\) is unitary.
In all these cases the block operators CMV matrices \(\mathcal{U }_0=\mathcal{U }_0(\{\Gamma _n\}_{n\ge 0})\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0=\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0(\{\Gamma _n\}_{n\ge 0})\) are defined by means the products \(\mathcal{U }_0=\mathcal{L }_0\mathcal{M }_0,\;\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0=\widetilde{\mathcal{M }}_0\mathcal{L }_0.\) These matrices are five block-diagonal. In the case when the operator \(\Gamma _m\) is unitary the block operator CMV matrices \(\mathcal{U }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0\) are finite and otherwise they are semi-infinite. As before the truncated block operator CMV matrices \(\mathcal{T }_0=\mathcal{T }_0((\{\Gamma _n\}_{n\ge 0})\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0=\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0(\{\Gamma _n\}_{n\ge 0})\) are defined by (3.10) and (3.11), i.e.,
The operators \(\mathcal{T }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0\) are unitarily equivalent completely non-unitary contractions and Proposition 3.2 hold true. The operators given by truncated block operator CMV matrices \(\mathcal{T }_m\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_m\) obtaining from \(\mathcal{U }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0\) by deleting first \(m+1\) rows and \(m+1\) columns are
-
co-shifts of the form
$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T }_m=\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_m=\begin{bmatrix} 0&I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}}&0&0&\ldots \\0&0&I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}}&0&\ldots \\0&0&0&I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}}&\ldots \\\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\vdots \end{bmatrix}:\begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}\\ \oplus \\ \vdots \end{array} \rightarrow \begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_m}\\ \oplus \\ \vdots \end{array}, \end{aligned}$$when \(\Gamma _m\) is isometry,
-
the unilateral shifts of the form
$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T }_m=\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_m=\begin{bmatrix}0&0&0&0&\ldots \\I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}}&0&0&0&\ldots \\0&I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}}&0&0&\ldots \\\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\vdots \end{bmatrix}:\begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}\\ \oplus \\ \vdots \end{array}\rightarrow \begin{array}{l} \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}\\ \oplus \\ \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _m}\\ \oplus \\ \vdots \end{array}, \end{aligned}$$when \(\Gamma _m\) is co-isometry.
One can see that Proposition 3.2 remains true.
The conservative systems
are simple and unitarily equivalent and, moreover, Theorem 3.3 remains valid.
In order to obtain precise forms of \(\mathcal{U }_0, \widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0, \mathcal{T }_0\), and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0\) one can consider the following cases:
-
1.
\(\Gamma _{2N}\) is isometric (co-isometric) for some \(N\),
-
2.
\(\Gamma _{2N+1}\) is isometric (co-isometric) for some \(N\),
-
3.
the operator \(\Gamma _{2N}\) is unitary for some \(N\),
-
4.
the operator \(\Gamma _{2N+1}\) is unitary for some \(N\).
In the following we consider all these situations and will give the forms of truncated CMV matrices. We use the sub-matrices defined by (4.3) and (4.4).
1.1 A.1 \(\Gamma _{2N}\) is Isometric
Define
Define the unitary operators
The unitary operator \(\mathcal{L }_0:\mathfrak{M }\bigoplus \widetilde{\mathfrak{H }}_0\rightarrow \mathfrak{N }\bigoplus \mathfrak{H }_0\) is defined as follows
Define \(\mathcal{U }_0=\mathcal{L }_0\mathcal{M }_0, \widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0=\widetilde{\mathcal{M }}_0\mathcal{L }_0.\) In particular, if the operator \(\Gamma _0\) is isometric, then
The block operator truncated CMV matrices \(\mathcal{T }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0\) are the products (for \(N\ge 1\)):
Calculations give
1.2 A.2 \(\Gamma _{2N}\) is Co-isometric
Then \(\Gamma _{n}=0, \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{n}}=\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{2N}}, D_{\Gamma _{n}}=I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{2N}}}\) for \(n> 2N\). Define
Define the unitary operators \(\mathcal{L }_0:\mathfrak{M }\bigoplus \widetilde{\mathfrak{H }}_0\rightarrow \mathfrak{N }\bigoplus \mathfrak{H }_0, \mathcal{M }_0:\mathfrak{M }\bigoplus \mathfrak{H }_0\rightarrow \mathfrak{M }\bigoplus \widetilde{\mathfrak{H }}_0\), and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{M }}_0:\mathfrak{N }\bigoplus \mathfrak{H }_0\rightarrow \mathfrak{N }\bigoplus \widetilde{\mathfrak{H }}_0\) as follows
Finally define \(\mathcal{U }_0=\mathcal{L }_0\mathcal{M }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0=\widetilde{\mathcal{M }}_0\mathcal{L }_0\).
In particular, if the operator \(\Gamma _{0}\) is co-isometric, then \(\mathfrak{H }_0\!=\!\widetilde{\mathfrak{H }}_0\!=\!\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _0}\bigoplus \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _0}\bigoplus \cdots ,\)
If \(N\ge 1\), then truncated CMV matrices \(\mathcal{T }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0\) are of the form
1.3 A.3 \(\Gamma _{2N+1}\) is Isometric
In this case \(\Gamma _{n}=0, \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{n}}=\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{2N+1}}, D_{\Gamma ^*_{n}}=I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma ^*_{2N+1}}}\) for \(n> 2N+1\). Define
Define the unitary operators
Define \(\mathcal{U }_0=\mathcal{L }_0\mathcal{M }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0=\widetilde{\mathcal{M }}_0\mathcal{L }_0\).
If the operator \(\Gamma _1\) is isometric, then
If \(N\ge 1\), then truncated CMV matrices \(\mathcal{T }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0\) take the form
1.4 A.4 \(\Gamma _{2N+1}\) is Co-isometric
Then \(\Gamma _{n}=0, \mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{n}}=\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{2N+1}}\),
\(D_{\Gamma _{n}}=I_{\mathfrak{D }_{\Gamma _{2N+1}}}\) for \(n> 2N+1\). Define
Define operators
Define \(\mathcal{U }_0=\mathcal{L }_0\mathcal{M }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{U }}_0=\widetilde{\mathcal{M }}_0\mathcal{L }_0\).
If \(\Gamma _1\) is co-isometric, then
If \(N\ge 1\), then truncated CMV matrices \(\mathcal{T }_0\) and \(\widetilde{\mathcal{T }}_0\) in this case take the form
1.5 A.5 \(\Gamma _{2N}\) is Unitary
In this case
If \(N=1\) (\(\Gamma _2\) is unitary), then
If \(N\ge 1\), then
1.6 A.6 \(\Gamma _{2N+1}\) is Unitary
Then
In this case if \(N\ge 1\), then
In particular if \(N=1\) (\(\Gamma _3\) is unitary), then
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arlinskiĭ, Y. The Schur Problem and Block Operator CMV Matrices. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 8, 875–923 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11785-013-0317-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11785-013-0317-3
Keywords
- Contraction
- Schur class function
- Schur problem
- Schur parameters
- Toeplitz matrix
- Kreĭn shorted operator
- Conservative system
- Transfer function
- CMV matrix