Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneously recovering electricity and water from wastewater by osmotic microbial fuel cells: Performance and membrane fouling

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the concept of the osmotic microbial fuel cell (OsMFC) was introduced in 2011, it has attracted growing interests for its potential applications in wastewater treatment and energy recovery. However, forward osmosis (FO) membrane fouling resulting in a severe water flux decline remains a main obstacle. Until now, the fouling mechanisms of FO membrane especially the development of biofouling layer in the OsMFC are not yet clear. Here, the fouling behavior of FO membrane in OsMFCs was systematically investigated. The results indicated that a thick fouling layer including biofouling and inorganic fouling was existed on the FO membrane surface. Compared to the inorganic fouling, the biofouling played a more important role in the development of the fouling layer. Further analyses by the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) implied that the growth of biofouling layer on the FO membrane surface in the OsMFC could be divided into three stages. Initially, microorganisms associated with ß-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides were deposited on the FO membrane surface. After that, the microorganisms grew into a biofilm caused a quick decrease of water flux. Subsequently, some of microorganisms were dead due to lack of nutrient source, in the meantime, polysaccharide and proteins in the biofouling layer were decomposed as nutrient source, thus leading to a slow development of the biofouling layer. Moreover, the microorganisms played a significant role in the formation and development of the biofouling layer, and further studies are needed to mitigate the deposition of microorganisms on FO membrane surfaces in OsMFCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (2012).Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Cath T Y, Childress A E, Elimelech M (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci, 281 (1–2): 70–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Gu Y, Cao C, Zhang J, Ng J W, Tang C (2014). Performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor with forward osmosis membrane for low-strength wastewater treatment. Water Res, 50: 114–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Z, He Z (2012). Effects of draw solutions and membrane conditions on electricity generation and water flux in osmotic microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol, 109(2): 70–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Z, Ping Q Y, Xiao L, He Z (2013). Reducing effluent discharge and recovering bioenergy in an osmotic microbial fuel cell treating domestic wastewater. Desalination, 312: 52–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Z (2012). One more function for microbial fuel cells in treating wastewater: producing high-quality water. Chemik, 66: 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre O, Tan Z, Kharkwal S, Ng H Y (2012). Effect of increasing anodic NaCl concentration on microbial fuel cell performance. Bioresour Technol, 112(3): 336–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li W W, Yu H Q, He Z (2014). Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by using microbial fuel cells-centered technologies. Energy Environ Sci, 7(3): 911–924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Gao W, Meng F, Liao B Q, Leung K T, Zhao L, Chen J, Hong H (2012). Membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment: A critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 42(7): 677–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Wang X, Wang Z, Lu Y, Li X, Ren Y (2017). Integrating microbial fuel cells with anaerobic acidification and forward osmosis membrane for enhancing bio-electricity and water recovery from low-strength wastewater. Water Res, 110: 74–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logan B E, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006). Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol, 40(17): 5181–5192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahan Y, Das D (2009). Effect of ionic strength, cation exchanger and inoculum age on the performance of microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 34(17): 7542–7546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mccutcheon J R, Elimelech M (2006). Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci, 284(1): 237–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mi B, Elimelech M (2008). Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci, 320(1): 292–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pant D, Van Bogaert G, Diels L, Vanbroekhoven K (2010). A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. Bioresour Technol, 101(6): 1533–1543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin M, Ping Q, Lu Y, Abu-Reesh I M, He Z (2015). Understanding electricity generation in osmotic microbial fuel cells through integrated experimental investigation and mathematical modeling. Bioresour Technol, 195: 194–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin M H, Hynes E A, Abu-Reesh I M, He Z (2017). Ammonium removal from synthetic wastewater promoted by current generation and water flux in an osmotic microbial fuel cell. J Clean Prod, 149: 856–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang C Y, She Q, Loong W C L, Wang R, Fane A G (2010). Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J Membr Sci, 354(1): 123–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Chen Y, Yuan B, Li X, Ren Y (2014b). Impacts of sludge retention time on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in a submerged osmotic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol, 161(3): 340–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hu T, Wang Z, Li X, Ren Y (2017a). Permeability recovery of fouled forward osmosis membranes by chemical cleaning during a long-term operation of anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactors treating low-strength wastewater. Water Res, 123: 505–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yuan B, Chen Y, Li X, Ren Y (2014a). Integration of microfiltration into osmotic membrane bioreactors to prevent salinity buildup. Bioresour Technol, 167(2): 116–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhao Y, Yuan B, Wang Z, Li X, Ren Y (2016b). Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thinfilm composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol, 202: 50–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X H, Chang V W C, Tang C Y (2016a). Osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: Advances, challenges, and prospects for the future. J Membr Sci, 504: 113–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X H, Wang C, Tang C Y, Li X F, Ren Y P (2017b). Development of a novel anaerobic membrane bioreactor simultaneously integrating microfiltration and forward membranes for low-strength wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci, 527: 1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X H, Zhang J F, Chang V W C, She Q H, Tang C Y (2018). Removal of cytostatic drugs from wastewater by an anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor. Chem Eng J, 339: 153–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X H, Zhao Y X, Li X F, Ren Y P (2017c). Performance evaluation of a microfiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactor (MF-OMBR) during removing silver nanoparticles from simulated wastewater. Chem Eng J, 313: 171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z W, Wu Z C, Ying X, Tian L (2008). Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) under sub-critical flux operation: Membrane foulant and gel layer characterization. J Membr Sci, 325(1): 238–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner C M, Logan B E, Saikaly P E, Amy G L (2013). Wastewater treatment, energy recovery and desalination using a forward osmosis membrane in an air-cathode microbial osmotic fuel cell. J Membr Sci, 428(428): 116–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie M, Bar-Zeev E, Hashmi S M, Nghiem L D, Elimelech M (2015). Role of Reverse Divalent Cation Diffusion in Forward Osmosis Biofouling. Environ Sci Technol, 49(22): 13222–13229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang E, Chae K J, Alayande A B, Kim K Y, Kim I S (2016). Concurrent performance improvement and biofouling mitigation in osmotic microbial fuel cells using a silver nanoparticle-polydopamine coated forward osmosis membrane. J Membr Sci, 513: 217–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Wang X, Tang C, Li X, Yu G (2015). In situ observation of the growth of biofouling layer in osmotic membrane bioreactors by multiple fluorescence labeling and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Water Res, 75: 188–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Brastad K S, He Z (2011). Integrating forward osmosis into microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment, water extraction and bioelectricity generation. Environ Sci Technol, 45(15): 6690–6696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Jacobson K S, Torres P, He Z (2010). Effects of anolyte recirculation rates and catholytes on electricity generation in a literscale upflow microbial fuel cell. Energy Environ Sci, 3(9): 1347–1352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J S, LoongWC L, Chou S, Tang C Y, Wang R, Fane A G (2012). Membrane biofouling and scaling in forward osmosis membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci, 403: 8–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W J, Wang X H, She Q H, Li X F, Ren Y P (2018). Osmotic membrane bioreactors assisted with microfiltration membrane for salinity control (MF-OMBR) operating at high sludge concentrations: Performance and implications. Chem Eng J, 337: 576–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X Z, Zhang F, Li W W, Li J, Li L L, Yu H Q, Huang M S, Huang T Y (2016). Insights into enhanced current generation of an osmotic microbial fuel cell under membrane fouling condition. J Membr Sci, 504: 40–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X Z, Zhang F, Li W W, Liu H Q, Wang Y K, Huang M S (2015). Forward osmosis membrane favors an improved proton flux and electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Desalination, 372: 26–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51578265); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. JUSRP 51728A); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0400707); and Jiangsu Cooperative Innovation Center of Technology and Material of Water Treatment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xinhua Wang or Xiufen Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Bian, X., Wang, H. et al. Simultaneously recovering electricity and water from wastewater by osmotic microbial fuel cells: Performance and membrane fouling. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 12, 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1049-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1049-4

Keywords

Navigation