Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the impact on groundwater safety of inter-basin water transfer using a coupled modeling approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface water and groundwater always behave in a coupled manner and are major components of hydrologic cycle. However, surface water simulation models and groundwater simulation models are run separately most of the time. Few models focus on the impact of hydraulic changes in the surface water flows on the groundwater, or specifically, the impact of a water transfer project to fill a seasonally dry channel. In this study, a linked surface water and groundwater simulation model was developed to assess the impact of a trans-basin water diversion project on the groundwater. A typical plain area east of Beijing was selected as a case study, representing Beijing’s main source of groundwater used for drinking water. A surface water quality model of the Chaobai River was developed based on the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP), and a groundwater model was developed based on the Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW) and the Modular 3-D transport model (MT3D). The results of the surface water simulation were used as input for the groundwater simulation. Water levels and four contaminants (NH3-N, CODMn, F, As) were simulated. With the same initial and boundary conditions, scenario analyses were performed to quantify the impact of different quantities of diversion water on the groundwater environment. The results showed the water quality of the groundwater sources was not significantly affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winter T C. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal, 1999, 7(1): 28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002, 10(1): 52–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Y S, Wang L. A review of modelling tools for implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in handling diffuse water pollution. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(9): 1819–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dor N, Syafalni S, Abustan I, Rahman M T A, Nazri M A A, Mostafa R, Mejus L. Verification of surface-groundwater connectivity in an irrigation canal using geophysical, water balance and stable isotope approaches. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(11): 2837–2853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Polomčić D, Hajdin B, Stevanović Z, Bajić D, Hajdin K. Groundwater management by riverbank filtration and an infiltration channel: The case of Obrenovac, Serbia. Hydrogeology Journal, 2013, 21(7): 1519–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang L C, Ho C C, Yeh M H, Yang C C. An integrating approach for conjunctive-use planning of surface and subsurface water system. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(1): 59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bobba A G, Cvetkovic V. Environmental Modelling of Hydrological Systems. Lund: Lund University, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  8. Appelo C A J, Postma D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution. Leiden: August Aimé Balkema, 2005

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Bencala K E. Interactions of solutes and streambed sediment: 2. A dynamic analysis of coupled hydrologic and chemical processes that determine solute transport. Water Resources Research, 1984, 20(12): 1804–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kollet S J, Maxwell R M. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Advances in Water Resources, 2006, 29(7): 945–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Safavi H R, Bahreini G R. Conjunctive simulation of surface water and groundwater resources under uncertainty. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, 2009, 33(B1): 79–94

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bobba A G. Ground water-surface water interface (GWSWI) modeling: recent advances and future challenges. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(14): 4105–4131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scibek J, Allen D M, Cannon A J, Whitfield P H. Groundwater-surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 333(2–4): 165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lubczynski M W, Gurwin J. Integration of various data sources for transient groundwater modeling with spatio-temporally variable fluxes-Sardon study case, Spain. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2005, 306(1–4): 71–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gedeon M, Wemaere I, Marivoet J. Regional groundwater model of north-east Belgium. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 335(1–4): 133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho J, Barone V A, Mostaghimi S. Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershed. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(1): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Almeida C N, Roehrig J, Wendland E. Development and integration of a groundwater simulation model to an open Geographic Information System. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014, 50(1): 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim N W, Chung I M, Won Y S, Arnold J G. Development and application of the integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2008, 356(1–2): 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arnold J G, Allen P M, Bernhardt G. A comprehensive surfacegroundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1993, 142(1–4): 47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang T, Pang Z. Changes in groundwater induced by water diversion in the Lower Tarim River, Xinjiang Uygur, NW China: Evidence from environmental isotopes and water chemistry. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010, 387(3–4): 188–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu C, Zheng H. South-to-north water transfer schemes for China. International Journal ofWater Resources Development, 2002, 18(3): 453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohden C, Kreuzer A, Chen Z, Kipfer R, Aeschbach-Hertig W. Characterizing the recharge regime of the strongly exploited aquifers of the North China Plain by environmental tracers. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(5): W05511

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang G, Xia J, Chen J. Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: a case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(7): W00A11

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ambrose R B, Wool T A, Martin J L. The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, WASP5, Part A: Model documentation. Athens: US EPA Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jia H, Wang S, Wei M, Zhang Y. Scenario analysis of water pollution control in the typical peri-urban river using a coupled hydrodynamic-water quality model. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2): 255–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jia H, Zhang Y, Guo Y. The development of a multi-species algal ecodynamic model for urban surface water systems and its application. Ecological Modelling, 2010, 221(15): 1831–1838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Park J Y, Park G A, Kim S J. Assessment of future climate change cmpact on cater cuality of Chungju Lake, South Korea, using WASP coupled with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2013, 49(6): 1225–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jia H, Cheng S. Spatial and dynamic simulation for Miyun Reservoir waters in Beijing. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 46(11–12): 473–479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Harbaugh A W, Banta E R, Hill M C, McDonald M G. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model: User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. Reston: US Geological Survey, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng C. MT3D: A Modular Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems. Bethesda: SS Papadopulos & Associates, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  31. Uhlík J, Baier J. Model evaluation of thermal energy potential of hydrogeological structures with flooded mines. Mine Water and the Environment, 2012, 31(3): 179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun F, Shao H, Kalbacher T, Wang W, Yang Z, Huang Z, Kolditz O. Groundwater drawdown at Nakou site of Beijing Plain: model development and calibration. Environmental Earth Science, 2011, 64(5): 1323–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang S, Shao J, Song X, Zhang Y, Huo Z, Zhou X. Application of MODFLOW and Geographic Information System to groundwater flow simulation in North China Plain, China. Environmental Geology, 2008, 55(7): 1449–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haifeng Jia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, H., Liang, S. & Zhang, Y. Assessing the impact on groundwater safety of inter-basin water transfer using a coupled modeling approach. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 9, 84–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0741-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0741-2

Keywords

Navigation