Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative analysis of CO2 embodiment in international trade: An overview of emerging literatures

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing volume of CO2 embodiment in international trade adds a layer of complexity to environmental policies and has raised arguments on the traditional production based responsibility for CO2 emissions. In order to help understand the quantity of CO2 embodiment in trade and its policy implications, this paper gives observations to recently emerging literatures that quantitatively discuss CO2 embodiment in trade. The analytical approaches share the principle of using input and output modeling but vary dramatically in study boundary and estimation accuracy. The calculations can be roughly categorized into three types: direct quantification of CO2 embodiments in multiregional trade, direct quantification of CO2 embodiment in bilateral trade, and indirect analysis by comparing the scenarios with or without trade. The practical estimations strongly rely on trade partner selection and data availability. An obvious imbalance of net CO2 embodiment in the commodity trade between major developed countries and developing economies as a whole was confirmed by these literatures. Carbon taxes and other possible limitations on CO2 emissions have been addressed. The consistency across the calculations could be enhanced by systematic analyses in more detail to convince the international community to take binding commitments for the reduction of global CO2 emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus consumption. Climate Change, 2008, 86(1–2): 51–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters G P, Weber C L, Guan D, Hubacek K. China’s growing CO2 emissions-A race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(17): 5939–5944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2008, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gj/index.htm

  4. Helm D, Smale R, Phillips J. Too good to be true: The UK’s climate change record. 2008, http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/publications/carbon_record_2007.pdf

  5. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(5): 1401–1407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyckoff AW, Roop J M. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: Implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 1994, 22(3): 187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Machado G, Roberto S, Ernst W. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: An input-output approach. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferng J J. Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspective of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(1): 121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shui B, Harriss R C. The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(18): 4063–4068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Costanza R. Embodied energy and economic valuation. Science, 1980, 210 (4475): 1219–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leontief W W. The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isard W. International and regional input-output analysis: A model of a space-economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1951, 33 (4): 318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chenery H B. Regional analysis. In: Chenery H, Clark P, eds. The Structure and Growth of the Italian Economy. Rome: United States Mutual Security Agency, 1953, 97–129

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moses L N. The stability of interregional trading patterns and inputoutput analysis. American Economic Review, 1955, 45(5): 803–826

    Google Scholar 

  15. Treloar G J, Love P E D, Holt G D. Using national input-output data for embodied energy analysis of individual residential buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 2001, 19(1): 49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang T, Watson J. Who owns China’s carbon emissions? Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, Tyndall Briefing Note, 2007, 23

  17. Hoshino Y, Sugiyama D. Quantifications of CO2 embodiment in trade. Discussion Paper, SERC08002. Japan: Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li H, Zhang P D, He C Y, Wang G. Evaluating the effects of embodied energy in international trade on ecological footprint in China. Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(1):136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qi Y, Li H M, Xu M. Accounting embodied carbon in import and export in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(3): 8–13 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luo S P, Wang C, Chen J N. Analysis of embodied energy in China’s international trade. Journal of Tsinghua University (Sci & Eng), 2009, in press (in Chinese)

  21. Li Y, Hewitt C N. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy, 2008, 36: 1907–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hubacek K, Giljum S. Applying physical input-output analysis to estimated land appreciation on international trade activities. Ecological Economics, 2003, 44: 131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nansai K, Moriguchi Y, Tohno S. Embodied Energy and Emission Intensity Data for Japan Using Input-Output Tables (3EID)-Inventory Data for LCA. CGER Report. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haan M. A structural decomposition analysis of pollution in the Netherlands. Economic Systems Research, 2001, 13: 181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Office of National Statistics. Environmental accounts: Input-output tables. London: National Office of Statistics of the UK, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ackerman F, Ishikawa M, Suga M. The carbon content of Japan-US trade. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9): 4455–4462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamamura C. Conceptual framework and compilation procedure of bilateral IO table. Asian International IO Series No. 34. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dimaranan B V. Global trade, assistance, and production: The GTAP 6 database. West Lafayette: Center for Global Trade Analysis. Purdue University, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  29. Muradian R, O’Connor M, Martinez-Alier J. Embodied pollution in trade: Estimating the environmental load displacement of industrialized countries. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(1): 51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chung H S, Rhee H C. Carbon dioxide emissions of Korea and Japan and its transmission via international trade. International Economic Journal, 2001, 15(4): 117–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kondo Y, Moriguchi Y, Shimizu H. CO2 emissions in Japan: Influences of imports and exports. Applied Energy, 1998, 59(2–3), 163–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tolmasquim M T, Machado G. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2003, 8: 139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmad N, Wyckoff A. Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of goods. STI Working Paper. Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, 2003, 15

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: An input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 1998, 26(6): 495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Pollution embodied in trade: The Norgwegian case. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16: 379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kander A, Lindmark M. Foreign trade and declining pollution in Sweden: a decomposition analysis of long-term structural and technological effects. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(13): 1590–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Munksgaard J, Pade L L, Minx J, Lenzen M. Influence of trade on national CO2 emissions. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 2005, 23(4): 324–336

    Google Scholar 

  38. Grossman G M, Krueger A B. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 1991

  39. Beghin J B, Bowland S D, Roland-Holst D, van der Mensbrugghe D. Trade integration, environmental degradation and public health in Chile: assessing the linkages. Environment and Development Economics, 2002, 7: 241–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson K, Strutt A. Will trade liberalization harm the environment? The case of Indonesia to 2020. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, 17(3): 203–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hayami H, Nakamura M. CO2 emission of an alternative technology and bilateral trade between Japan and Canada: Relocating production and an implication for joint implementation. Discussion Paper 75, Keio Economi Observatory. Tokyo: Keio University, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hoerner J A, Bosquet B. Environmental tax reform: The European experience. Washington DC: Center for a Sustainable Economy, 2001: 11–27

    Google Scholar 

  43. Brown L R. Shifting taxes, plan B: Rescuing a planet under stress and a civilization in trouble. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2003

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kansai Research Centre, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Kobe, 651-0073, Japan

    Xianbing Liu

  2. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Can Wang

Authors
  1. Xianbing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Can Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianbing Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Wang, C. Quantitative analysis of CO2 embodiment in international trade: An overview of emerging literatures. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 3, 12–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-009-0011-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-009-0011-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation