Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical solution for the longitudinal response of cross-fault shield tunnel considering plastic deformation of circumferential joints

考虑环缝接头塑性变形的跨断层盾构隧道纵向响应解析解

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an analytical model for the longitudinal deformation response of cross-fault shield tunnels, in which the tunnel is assumed to be a Timoshenko beam placed on Winkler’s foundation. The plastic deformation behavior of circumferential joints and the influence of horizontal foundation friction are considered in the proposed model. A case study of normal faulting based on convincing numerical simulations is carried out to verify the rationality of the proposed model. Subsequently, the plastic deformation characteristics and distribution of circumferential joints are analyzed, and the factors affecting the longitudinal response of the tunnel are discussed through parametric analysis. The analysis results demonstrate that the proposed analytical model is reliable and applicable to calculating the longitudinal response of cross-fault shield tunnel, especially in evaluating the deformation of the circumferential joints under normal faulting. Severe plastic deformation is observed on the annular joints when the shield tunnel is subjected to 10 cm faulting. Under crossing active fault, the ground has a more significant restriction on the longitudinal deformation of the shield tunnel, resulting in a larger deformation of circumferential joints. A larger elastic modulus of the ground leads to a more notable longitudinal deformation of the tunnel lining. When the width of the fault fracture zone is not considered, the results of longitudinal internal force and deformation of shield tunnels are conservative. In the plastic deformation stage of the circumferential joints, the larger the plastic equivalent bending stiffness ratio of the shield tunnel, the slighter the plastic deformation of circumferential joints. The proposed analytical solution can be used to predict the joint deformation of cross-fault shield tunnels and provide guidance for the waterproof design of shield tunnels.

摘要

本文基于Winkler地基Timoshenko梁理论, 考虑水平地基摩阻力及盾构隧道环缝接头塑性变形 特征, 提出了一种跨断层盾构隧道纵向响应解析模型。首先, 以正断层错动工况为例, 采用数值模拟 方法验证解析解的合理性。然后, 分析了盾构隧道环缝接头的塑性变形特征, 并通过参数分析讨论了 影响隧道纵向变形响应的因素。研究结果表明: 断层错动下盾构隧道环缝接头张开及错台变形均较为 显著, 解析模型计算得到的盾构隧道纵向力学响应特征与数值模型计算结果规律一致; 在断层错动 10 cm时, 盾构隧道环缝接头已产生显著的塑性变形; 在穿越活动断层工况中, 地层对隧道纵向变形 的限制作用更加明显, 导致环缝接头变形量更大; 地基刚度越大, 盾构隧道纵向变形响应越显著。当 不考虑断层破碎带宽度时, 计算得到隧道纵向力学响应值是偏安全的; 在隧道环缝接头弹性变形阶 段, 弹性弯曲刚度有效率越大, 接头张开量越小; 在环缝接头塑性变形阶段, 盾构隧道二次塑性等效 弯曲刚度比越大, 盾构隧道环缝接头塑性变形越小。本文提出的解析模型可以预测跨断层盾构隧道环缝接头变形, 同时可以为盾构隧道接缝防水设计提供理论指导。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. ZHONG Zi-lan, WANG Zhen, ZHAO Mi, et al. Structural damage assessment of mountain tunnels in fault fracture zone subjected to multiple strike-slip fault movement [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 104: 103527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. SABAGH M, GHALANDARZADEH A. Centrifugal modeling of continuous shallow tunnels at active normal faults intersection [J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 22: 100325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. KIANI M, AKHLAGHI T, GHALANDARZADEH A. Experimental modeling of segmental shallow tunnels in alluvial affected by normal faults [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51: 108–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LUNARDI P, CASSANI G, CANZONERI A, et al. Passage of a precast segmental lining tunnel through an active fault—Special segments and details-Thessaloniki metro [C]//Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2017 - Surface challenges - Underground solutions. Bergen, Norway: JSCE, 1966: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WU Qiang. Summary of shantou bay cross - harbour tunnel design for Shantou-Shanwei railway [J]. Railway standard design, 2021, 65(10): 38–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.202106190005. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. YIN Tao, CAO Zhen, SU San-qing. Study on the adaptability of shield tunnel segments orthogonal crossing grade III loess ground fissure section [J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8053415.

  7. LIU Xue-zeng, LI Xue-feng, SANG Yun-long, et al. Experimental study on normal fault rupture propagation in loose strata and its impact on mountain tunnels [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 49: 417–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.05.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ZHAO Kun, CHEN Wei-zhong, YANG Dian-sen, et al. Mechanical tests and engineering applicability of fibre plastic concrete used in tunnel design in active fault zones [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 88: 200–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. AN S, TAO L J, HAN X C, et al. Application of two-level design method on subway tunnel crossing active fault: A case study on Urumqi subway tunnel intersected by reverse fault dislocation [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(5): 3871–3884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02164-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. SABAGH M, GHALANDARZADEH A. Numerical modelings of continuous shallow tunnels subject to reverse faulting and its verification through a centrifuge [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 128: 103813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LI Gan, ZHU Chun, HE Man-chao, et al. Intelligent method for parameters optimization of cable in soft rock tunnel base on longitudinal wave velocity [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 133: 104905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. JALALI M. Tunnel rehabilitation in fault zone using sequential joints method-case study: Karaj water conveyance tunnel International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 2018, 52(1): 87–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/ijmge.2018.66155.

    Google Scholar 

  13. GOU Yu-xuan, HUANG Qiang-bing, YANG Xiao-qiang. Model test study on deformation and failure mechanism of shield tunnel intersecting ground fissure with large angle [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55(10): 117–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.21090868. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. KIANI M, GHALANDARZADEH A, AKHLAGHI T, et al. Experimental evaluation of vulnerability for urban segmental tunnels subjected to normal surface faulting [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 89: 28–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZAHERI M, RANJBARNIA M, DIAS D, et al. Performance of segmental and shotcrete linings in shallow tunnels crossing a transverse strike-slip faulting [J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 23: 100333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. HU Zhi-ping, REN Xiang, WANG Qi-yao, et al. Analytical method for the mechanical response of buried pipeline under the action of strike-slip faulting [J]. Underground Space, 2022, 7(2): 268–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2021.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. VALSAMIS A I, BOUCKOVALAS G D. Analytical methodology for the verification of buried steel pipelines with flexible joints crossing strike-slip faults [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 138: 106280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. YAO Chao-fan, HE Chuan, TAKEMURA J, et al. Active length of a continuous pipe or tunnel subjected to reverse faulting [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 148: 106825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. NI Peng-peng, MANGALATHU S. Simplified evaluation of pipe strains crossing a normal fault through the dissipated energy method [J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 167: 393–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. QIU Wen-ge, HU Hui, ZHAO Bin. Numerical analysis of damping structure of deep buried tunnel crossing fault zone [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 252–257. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. YAN Yi-fei, SHAO Bing, WANG Jian-jun, et al. A study on stress of buried oil and gas pipeline crossing a fault based on thin shell FEM model [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 472–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. LIU Guo-zhao, QIAO Ya-fei, HE Man-chao, et al. An analytical solution of longitudinal response of tunnels under dislocation of active fault [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 923–932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0585. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. QIAO Y F, TANG J, ZHANG X D. Longitudinal mechanical response of tunnels under reverse faulting and its analytical solution [C]//IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing Ltd, 2021, 861(2): 022015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/861/2/022015.

    Google Scholar 

  24. TAO Lian-jin, WANG Zhi-gang, SHI Cheng, et al. Analytical solution for longitudinal response of pipeline structure under fault dislocation based on Pasternak foundation model [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(9): 1577–1586. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. YAN Gao-ming, ZHAO Bo-ming, WANG Zi-jun, et al. Simplified analytical solution for responses of fault-crossing tunnels with flexible joints under fault movement [J]. Structures, 2022, 45: 984–998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. GENG Ping, CHEN Ping-liang, CHEN Chang-jian, et al. Longitudinal analysis model of shield tunnel considering contact nonlinearity and its application [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2021, 49(6): 759–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.21139. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. SHIBA Y, KAWASHIMA K, OBINATA N, et al. An evaluation method of longitudinal stiffness of shield tunnel linings for application to seismic response analyses [J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1988, 1988(398): 319–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1988.398_319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. LIANG Rong-zhu. Simplified analytical method for evaluating the effects of overcrossing tunnelling on existing shield tunnels using the nonlinear Pasternak foundation model [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59(6): 1711–1727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. LIU Jian-wen, SHI Cheng-hua, LEI Ming-feng, et al. Improved analytical method for evaluating the responses of a shield tunnel to adjacent excavations and its application [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. YONG Z, MAO Jin-rong, TAO Xiang-ling, et al. Analytical solution of longitudinal deformation of existing shield tunnel induced by surface surcharge [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40: 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3973/J.ISSN.2096-4498.2020.01.009.

    Google Scholar 

  31. HUANG Hong-wei, GONG Wen-ping, KHOSHNEVISAN S, et al. Simplified procedure for finite element analysis of the longitudinal performance of shield tunnels considering spatial soil variability in longitudinal direction [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 64: 132–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.11.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. XU Ling. Longitudinal settlement of shield tunnel in soft ground [D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2002. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. ZHOU Ning, YUAN Yong. Correlation of cross-river shield tunnel between longitudinal deformation curvature and segment leakage [J]. Journal of Tongji university (Natural Science), 2009, 37(11): 1446–1451, 1501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2009.11.005. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  34. CHENG Hong-zhan, CHEN Ren-peng, WU Huai-na, et al. General solutions for the longitudinal deformation of shield tunnels with multiple discontinuities in strata [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 107: 103652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. YU Jian, LI Hao, HUANG Mao-song, et al. Timoshenko-beam-based response of existing tunnel to single tunneling underneath and numerical verification of opening and dislocation [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 147: 104757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. BS5975-2008. Code of practice for temporary works procedures and the permissible stress design of false work [S]. British Standards Institution, 2008.

  37. WU Huai-na, SHEN Shui-long, LIAO Shao-ming, et al. Longitudinal structural modelling of shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation between segmental rings [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50: 317–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. LIANG Rong-zhu, WU Wen-bing, YU Feng, et al. Simplified method for evaluating shield tunnel deformation due to adjacent excavation [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 94–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. SUN Fei, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, QING Chang. Research on influence upon tunnel structure of metro line 1 in Urumqi forced by normal fault dislocation [J]. China Railway Science, 2019, 40(2): 54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2019.02.08. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  40. CHEN Ren-peng, CHEN Shuan, WU Huai-na, et al. Investigation on deformation behavior and failure mechanism of a segmental ring in shield tunnels based on elaborate numerical simulation [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 117: 104960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. ZHENG Yong-lai, HAN Wen-xing, TONG Qi-hua, et al. Study on longitudinal crack of shield tunnel segment joint due to asymmetric settlement in soft soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005(24): 4552–4558. (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LI Xing-gao developed the overarching research goals and edited the draft of manuscript. The analytical solution was obtained by LI Hanyuan. LI Han-yuan validated the proposed method with 3D numerical simulation and wrote the first draft of manuscript. YANG Yi and LIU Hao edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xing-gao Li  (李兴高).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

LI Han-yuan, LI Xing-gao, YANG Yi and LIU Hao declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Foundation item: Project(2015CB057800) supported by the National Basic Research Development Program of China; Project(2021-K-025) supported by the Science and Technology Foundation of Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Hy., Li, Xg., Yang, Y. et al. Analytical solution for the longitudinal response of cross-fault shield tunnel considering plastic deformation of circumferential joints. J. Cent. South Univ. 30, 1675–1694 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5326-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5326-4

Key words

关键词

Navigation