Skip to main content
Log in

GIS-based analysis for hotspot identification of tradeoff between ecosystem services: A case study in Yanhe Basin, China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services have been studied for a long time, few studies have specifically focused on the quantification of tradeoffs between ecosystem services and tradeoff hotspots. Based on previous studies of ecosystem service assessment, we proposed a feasible method to analyze the tradeoffs between ecosystem services, including determination of their relationship, quantification of tradeoffs, and identification of tradeoff hotspots. Potential influencing factors were then further analyzed. The Yanhe Basin in the Loess Plateau was selected as an example to demonstrate the application process. Firstly, the amounts of net primary production (NPP) and water yield (WY) in 2000 and 2008 were estimated by using biophysical models. Secondly, correlation analysis was used to indicate the tradeoffs between NPP and WY. Thirdly, tradeoff index (TI NPP/WY) was established to quantify the extent of tradeoffs between NPP and WY, and the average value of TI NPP/WY is 24.4 g/(mm·m2) for the Yanhe Basin between 2000 and 2008. Finally, the tradeoff hotspots were identified. The results indicated that the area of lowest tradeoff index concentrated in the middle part of the Yanhe Basin and marginal areas of the southern basin. Map overlapping was used for preliminary analysis to seek potential influencing factors, and the results showed that shrub was the best suited for growing in the Yanhe Basin, but also was a potential influencing factor for formulation of the tradeoff hotspots. The concept of tradeoff index could also be used to quantify the degree of synergy between different ecosystem services. The method to identify the tradeoff hotspots could help us to narrow the scope of study area for further research on the relationship among ecosystem services and concentrate on the potential factors for formation of tradeoff between ecosystem services, enhance the capacity to maintain the sustainability of ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abson D J, Termansen M, 2011. Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns. Conservation Biology, 25(2): 250–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01623.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment—part 1: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1): 73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauman K A, Daily G C, Duarte T K et al., 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32: 67–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan B A, 2013. Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: snthesizing complex linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 27: 124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S et al., 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21: 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreno L, Frank F C, Viglizzo E F, 2012. Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 154: 68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, dArge R, de Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Fisher B, Mulder K et al., 2007. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3): 478–491. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward F I et al., 2001. Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biology, 7(4): 357–373. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00383.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis I A, 2004. Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes. Ecological Economics, 50(3–4): 163–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A, Lodge D, Alder J et al., 2006. Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services. Ecology, 87(8): 1915–1924. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1915: hltcat]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C L, Bao C, Huang J C, 2007. Management implications to water resources constraint force on socio-economic system in rapid urbanization: a case study of the hexi corridor, NW China. Water Resources Management, 21(9): 1613–1633. doi 10.1007/s11269-006-9117-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X M, Fu B J, Lu N et al., 2013. How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of carbon sequestration in China’s Loess Plateau. Scientific Reports, 3. doi: 10.1038/srep02846

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng X M, Sun G, Fu B J et al., 2012. Regional effects of vegetation restoration on water yield across the Loess Plateau, China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(8): 2617–2628. doi: 10.5194/hess-16-2617-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro P J, Hanauer M M, 2011. Protecting ecosystems and alleviating poverty with parks and reserves: ‘Win-Win’ or tradeoffs? Environmental & Resource Economics, 48(2): 269–286. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9408-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field C B, Behrenfeld M J, Randerson J T et al., 1998. Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science, 281(5374): 237–240. doi: 10.1126/science. 281.5374.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field C B, Randerson J T, Malmstrom C M, 1995. Global net primary production—combing ecology and remote-sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1): 74–88. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, De Fries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309: 570–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Liu Y, Lu Y H et al., 2011a. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Complexity, 8(4): 284–293. doi: 10.1016/j. ecocom.2011.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Su C H, Wei Y P et al., 2011b. Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecological Research, 26(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11284-010- 0766-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparatos A, Stromberg P, Takeuchi K, 2011. Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 142(3–4): 111–128. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011. 04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower S T, Kucharik C J, Norman J M, 1999. Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, f(APAR), and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(1): 29–51. doi: 10.1016/s0034-4257(99)00056-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamon W R, 1963. Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M K, Bullock J M, Hooftman D A P, 2013. Mapping ecosystem service and biodiversity changes over 70 years in a rural English county. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4): 841–850. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jopke C, Kreyling J, Maes J et al., 2015. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecological Indicators, 49: 46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp D S, Mendenhall C D, Sandi R F et al., 2013. Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield. Ecology Letters, 16(11): 1339–1347. doi: 10.1111/ele.12173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D et al., 2001. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 39(3): 333–346. doi: 10.1016/s0921- 8009(01)00250-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laterra P, Orue M E, Booman G C, 2012. Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 154: 56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C B, Qi J G, Wang S B et al., 2014. A holistic system approach to understanding underground water dynamics in the Loess Tableland: a case study of the dongzhi Loess Tableland in Northwest China. Water Resources Management, 28(10): 2937–2951. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0647-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Dengke, Fan Jianzhong, Wang Juan, 2011. Variation characteristics of vegetation net primary productivity in Shaanxi Province based on MO17A3. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 30(12): 2776–2782. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Little C, Lara A, McPhee J et al., 2009. Revealing the impact of forest exotic plantations on water yield in large scale watersheds in South-Central Chile. Journal of Hydrology, 374(1–2): 162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon R A, Chaubey I, 2013. A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 257: 57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y H, Fu B J, Feng X M et al., 2012. A policy-driven large scale ecological restoration: quantifying ecosystem services changes in the Loess Plateau of China. PloS one, 7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031782

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J et al., 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 4–11. doi: 10.1890/080023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Wu J X, Xu Z R, 2014. Analysis of the tradeoffs between provisioning and regulating services from the perspective of varied share of net primary production in an alpine grassland ecosystem. Ecological Complexity, 17: 79–86. doi: 10.1016/j. ecocom.2013.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B et al., 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production—a process model-based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 811–841. doi: 10.1029/93gb02725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power A G, 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 365(1554): 2959–2971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J, Turner M G, 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(29): 12149–12154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310539110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran Dachuan, Yao Wenyi, Wu Yonghong et al., 2014. Effect of forest-grass vegetation on reducing flood and sediment from 1997 to 2006 in Yanhe Basin. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 12(1): 1–9. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M, 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(11): 5242–5247. doi 10.1073/pnas.0907284107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Zongping, Zhang Guanghui, Yang Qinke, 2012. Characteristics of runoff and sediment variation in Yanhe River Basin in last 50 years. Hydrology, 32(5): 81–86. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff M, 2011. The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 70(3): 497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice I C et al., 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biology, 9(2): 161–185. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Ashmore M R, Black H I J et al., 2013. Review: The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4): 812–829. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Fuqiang, Kang Muyi, Chen Yaru et al., 2009. Estimation of vegetation net primary productivity on North Shaanxi Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28(11): 2311–2318. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C H, Fu B J, Wei Y P et al., 2012. Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities: a case study in the Yanhe watershed. Sustainability Science, 7(1): 17–32. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0145-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su C H, Fu B J, 2013. Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Global and Planetary Change, 101: 119–128. doi: 10.1016/j. gloplacha.2012.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Alstad K, Chen J et al., 2011. A general predictive model for estimating monthly ecosystem evapotranspiration. Ecohydrology, 4(2): 245–255. doi: 10.1002/eco.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu X B, Kwong A K L, Dai F C et al., 2009. Field monitoring of rainfall infiltration in a loess slope and analysis of failure mechanism of rainfall-induced landslides. Engeering Geology, 105(1–2): 134–150. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bocher P K et al., 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 89–104. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S A, Fu B J, He C S et al., 2011a. A comparative analysis of forest cover and catchment water yield relationships in northern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 262(7): 1189–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y H, Yu P T, Feger K H et al., 2011b. Annual runoff and evapotranspiration of forestlands and non-forestlands in selected basins of the Loess Plateau of China. Ecohydrology, 4(2): 277–287. doi: 10.1002/eco.215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y H, Yu P T, Xiong W et al., 2008. Water-yield reduction after afforestation and related processes in the semiarid Liupan Mountains, Northwest China. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(5): 1086–1097. doi: 10.1111/j.1752- 1688.2008.00238.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Zhu Y J et al., 2011c. Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(4): 437–448. doi: 10.1016/j. agrformet.2010.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei W, Chen L D, Zhang H D et al., 2015. Effect of rainfall variation and landscape change on runoff and sediment yield from a loess hilly catchment in China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(3): 1005–1016. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3451-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Yan N, Xiong J et al., 2012. Validation of ETWatch using field measurements at diverse landscapes: A case study in Hai Basin of China. Journal of Hydrology, 436–437: 67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J S, Feng Z, Gao Y et al., 2013. Hotspot and relationship identification in multiple landscape services: A case study on an area with intensive human activities. Ecological Indicators, 29: 529–537. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie B, Qin Z, Wang Y et al., 2014. Spatial and temporal variation in terrestrial net primary productivity on Chinese Loess Plateau and its influential factors. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(11): 244–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong J, Wu B, Yan N et al., 2010. Estimation and validation of land surface evaporation using remote sensing and meteorological data in North China. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 3(3): 337–344. doi: 10.1109/jstars.2010.2040806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X G, Wu B F, Li Q Z et al. 2006. A New Net Primary Production Estimating Model Using NOAA-AVHRR Applied to the Haihe Basin, China. New York: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z X, Takeuchi K, Ishidaira H et al., 2005. An overview of water resources in the Yellow River Basin. Water International, 30(2): 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G F, Ge Y, Xue H et al., 2015. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136: 110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Rongjin, Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua et al., 2004. Research on the relationship between water and eco-environment construction in loess hilly and gully regions. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 25(2): 37–42. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Q Z, Wu S H, Zhao D S et al., 2014. Modeling net primary productivity of the terrestrial ecosystem in China from 1961 to 2005. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(1): 3–17. doi: 10.1007/s11442-014-1069-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Kreuter U, Li B et al., 2004. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy, 21(2): 139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2003.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M S, Running S W, 2010. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science, 329(5994): 940–943. doi: 10.1126/science.1192666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Yuezhong, Mu Xingmin, Yan Baowen et al., 2014). Influence of vegetation restoration on runoff and sediment of Yanhe Basin. Journal of Sediment Research, vol(issue) 67–73. (in Chinese)

  • Zheng Z M, Fu B J, Hu H T et al., 2014. A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: a case study on Yanhe Basin, China. Landscape Ecology, 29(10): 1689–1696. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0088-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bojie Fu.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 41230745), Major Program of High Resolution Earth Observation System (No. 30-Y30B13-9003-14/16-02)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Z., Fu, B. & Feng, X. GIS-based analysis for hotspot identification of tradeoff between ecosystem services: A case study in Yanhe Basin, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 26, 466–477 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-016-0816-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-016-0816-z

Keywords

Navigation