Skip to main content
Log in

Artifact reduction in JPEG2000 compressed images at low bit-rate using mathematical morphology filtering

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

JPEG2000 is known as an efficient standard to encode images. However, at very low bit-rates, artifacts or distortions can be observed in decoded images. In order to improve the visual quality of decoded images and make them perceptually acceptable, we propose in this work a new preprocessing scheme. This scheme consists in preprocessing the image to be encoded using a nonlinear filtering, considered as a prior phase to JPEG 2000 compression. More specifically, the input image is decomposed into low- and high-frequency sub-images using morphological filtering. Afterward, each sub-image is compressed using JPEG2000, by assigning different bit-rates to each sub-image. To evaluate the quality of the reconstructed image, two different metrics have been used, namely (a) peak signal to noise ratio, to evaluate the visual quality of the low-frequency sub-image, and (b) structural similarity index measure, to evaluate the visual quality of the high-frequency sub-image. Based on the reconstructed images, experimental results show that, at low bit-rates, the proposed scheme provides better visual quality compared to a direct use of JPEG2000 (excluding any preprocessing).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

JPEG2000:

Joint Photographic Experts Group committee in 2000

DWT:

Discrete wavelet transform

DCT:

Discrete cosine transform

IDWT:

Inverse discrete wavelet transform

\(I(x,y)\) :

Image with spatial coordinate \(x\) and \(y\)

\(S\) :

Structuring element

\(I\oplus S\) :

Dilation of \(I\) by \(S\)

\(I\ominus S\) :

Erosion of \(I\) by \(S\)

\(I\circ S\) :

Morphological opening of \(I\) by \(S\)

\(I{\bullet } S\) :

Morphological closing of \(I\) by \(S\)

\(g, f\) :

\(g\) is the mask and \(f\) is the marker

\(R_{g}(f)\) :

Reconstruction of g from \(f\)

\(\gamma ^{(\mathrm{rec})}(f, g)\) :

Opening by reconstruction of \(g\) from \(f\)

\(I_{\mathrm{Low}}\) :

Decomposed image \(I\) at low frequency

\(I_{\mathrm{High}}\) :

Decomposed image \(I\) at high frequency

Rate:

Compression ratio

\(\alpha \) :

Compression ratio of the low-frequency sub-image (bit per pixel)

\(\beta \) :

Compression ratio of the high-frequency sub-image (bit per pixel)

\(\varPsi (I_{\mathrm{Low}},\alpha )\) :

Compression operator of \(I_{\mathrm{Low}}\) by \(\alpha \)

\(\varPsi (I_\mathrm{High},\beta )\) :

Compression operator of \(I_\mathrm{High}\) by \(\beta \)

\(\hbox {Comp}_{\mathrm{Low}}\) :

Compressed low-frequency sub-image

\(\hbox {Comp}_{\mathrm{High}}\) :

Compressed high-frequency sub-image

\(\varPsi ^{-1}(I_{\mathrm{Low}},\alpha )\) :

The inverse compression operator of \(I_{\mathrm{Low}}\) by \(\alpha \)

\(\varPsi ^{-1}(I_{\mathrm{High}},\beta )\) :

The inverse compression operator of \(I_{\mathrm{High}}\) by \(\beta \)

bpp:

Bit per pixel

MSE:

Mean square error

PSNR:

Peak signal to noise ratio

SSIM:

Structural SIMilarity

\(l()\) :

Luminance comparison function

\(c()\) :

Contrast comparison function

\(s()\) :

Structure comparison function

\(\mu _{f}\) :

The average of \(f\)

\(\sigma _{f}^2\) :

The variance of \(f\)

\(\sigma _{fg} \) :

The covariance between \(f\) and \(g\)

:

The dynamic range of the pixel values

\(B\) :

The bit depth used for noncompressed image coding

\(C_{1},C_{2}\) :

Two variables to stabilize the division with weak denominator

\(\hbox {PSNR}_{\mathrm{New}}\) :

Proposed image quality metrics

References

  1. Christopoulos, C.: The JPEG2000 still image coding system: an overview. Proc. IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron. 46(4), 1103–1127 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, M.D.: The JPEG-2000 Still Image Compression Standard, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 1N 2412. Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria, Canada (December 2005)

  3. Winkler, S.: Digital Video Quality: Vision Models and Metrics. Wiley, New York (2005)

  4. Singh, S., Sharma, R.K., Sharma, M.K.: Tile boundary artifacts reduction of JPEG2000 compressed images. Proc. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 04, 281–290 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dherete, P., Durand, S., Froment, J., Rouge, B.: Best wavelet packet basis for joint image deblurring-denoising and compression. In: Proceedings of the Mathematics of Data/Image Coding, Compression and Encryption V, with Applications, pp. 2279–2283, Seattle, WA (Jan. 8–11 2003)

  6. Tai, S.-C., Wang, C.-C., Huang, L.-S., Chen, Y.-R.: Morphological De-ringing filter design for JEPG-2000. Proc. J. Inf. Sci. Eng 19(4), 667–680 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, C.-C., Hwang, C.B.: ‘Ringing Artifacts Reduction using Adaptive Morphological filter for JPEG2000’, Proc; Journal of Computers, Vol. 19, pp. 15–23 (2008)

  8. Nosratinia, A.: Post-processing of JPEG-2000 images to remove compression artifacts. Proc. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 10, 296–299 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matheron, G.: Random Sets and Integral Geometry. Wiley, New York (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Serra, J.: Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press, London (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Koskinen, L., Jaakko, A.: Soft morphological filters: a robust morphological filtering method. J. Electron. Imaging 3, 60–70 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeybeck, E.H., Nait-Ali, A.: Improvement of JPEG2000 lossy compression performance using preliminary nonlinear-filtering. Proc. Int. J. Signal Process. 4, 24–30 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parvati, K., Prakasa Rao, B.S., Mariya Das, M.: Image segmentation using gray-scale morphology and marker-controlled watershed transformation. Dis. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2008, 1–8 (2008)

  14. Podlasov, A., Ageenko, E.: Morphological Reconstruction of Semantic Layers in Map Images. University of Joansuu, Department of computer science, Finland, Technical report (2004)

  15. Salembier, P., Serra, J.: Flat zones filtering, connected operators, and filters by reconstruction. Proc. IEEE Trans Image Process. 4(8), 53–60 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vincent, L.: Morphological grayscale reconstruction: Definition, efficient algorithms and applications in image analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 176–201. Piscataway, NJ, USA (1993)

  17. Guangyao, C., Luhong, L., Siwei, M., Zhao, D.: Image Quality Assessment Using Spatial Frequency Component. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia: Advances in Multimedia Information Processing, pp. 201–211, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)

  18. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: A universal image quality index. Proc. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 9(3), 81–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, pp. 1398–1402 (2003)

  20. Hore, A., Ziou, D.: Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 2366–2369. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2010)

  21. Ouni, T., Lassoued, A., Abid, M.: Lossless image compression using gradient based space filling curves (G-SFC). In: Proceedings of the Springer, Signal, Image and Video Processing, Vol. 7 (2013)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Layachi Bennacer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennacer, L., Bouledjfane, B. & Nait-Ali, A. Artifact reduction in JPEG2000 compressed images at low bit-rate using mathematical morphology filtering. SIViP 8, 677–686 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-013-0583-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-013-0583-6

Keywords

Navigation