Skip to main content
Log in

A 43-year-old functional Starr–Edwards ball and cage mechanical aortic valve

  • Case Report
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Starr–Edwards ball and cage valves were among the first and most commonly used mechanical valve devices. These valves offered a novel design that would become one of the mainstays for replacement of severely diseased heart valves in the early second half of the twentieth century. We describe the case of a patient with a Starr–Edwards ball and cage valve in the aortic position that was replaced 40 years earlier who was admitted with concerns for symptoms of new volume overload. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a functional mechanical aortic valve with no evidence of compromise. The patient was treated with diuretics for congestive heart failure exacerbation and on 3 years follow-up was doing well. This is one of the few cases reported of a patient with Starr–Edwards ball and cage aortic valve functioning normally extending into the fifth decade without signs of significant instability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert S, Lowell EM, Mccord CW, Griswold HE. Aortic replacement. Circulation. 1963;27(4):779–83. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.27.4.779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Puga FJ, Danielson GK, Mullany CJ, Anderson BJ, Ilstrup DM. Event status of the Starr-Edwards aortic valve to 20 years: a benchmark for comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(3):620–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pilegaard HK, Lund O, Nielsen TT, Magnussen K, Knudsen MA, Albrechtsen OK. Twenty-two-year experience with aortic valve replacement. Starr-Edwards ball valves versus disc valves. Tex Heart Inst J. 1991;18(1):24–33. Erratum in: Tex Heart Inst J. 1991;18(2):145

  4. Gödje OL, Fischlein T, Adelhard K, Nollert G, Klinner W, Reichart B. Thirty-year results of starr-edwards prostheses in the aortic and mitral position. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(3):613–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(96)00945-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Forty-year survival with the Starr-Edwards heart valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13(1):91–6 (discussion 96).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amrane M, Soulat G, Carpentier A, Jouan J. Starr-Edwards aortic valve: 50+ years and still going strong: a case report. Eur Hear J Case Rep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytx014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kataruka A, Otto CM. Valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 30):S3629–36. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.07.38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ion S. Jovin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powell, S., Choxi, R., Gunda, S. et al. A 43-year-old functional Starr–Edwards ball and cage mechanical aortic valve. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 69, 97–99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01383-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01383-6

Keywords

Navigation