Abstract
Karen Stohr’s book On Manners argues persuasively that rules of etiquette, though conventional, play an essential moral role, because they “serve as vehicles through which we express important moral values like respect and consideration for the needs, ideas, and opinions of others” (Stohr 2012: 3–4). Stohr frequently invokes Kantian concepts and principles in order to make her point. In Part 2 of this essay, I shall argue that the significance of etiquette is better understood using a virtue ethics framework, like that of Confucianism, rather than the language of Kantianism. Within the Chinese tradition, Daoists have frequently been critics of Confucian ritualism. Consequently, in Part 3, I shall consider some possible Daoist critiques of Stohr’s work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angle, Stephen. 2012. Sagehood. New York: Oxford University Press.
Battaly, Heather, and Amy Coplan. 2008. “Diagnosing Character: A House Divided?” In House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies, edited by Henry Jacoby and William Irwin. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Benn, James A. 2005. “Buddhism, Alcohol, and Tea in Medieval China.” In Of Tripod and Palate: Food and Religion in Traditional China, edited by Roel Sterckx. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
David, Larry, and Larry Levin. 1992. “The Boyfriend: Part 1.” Seinfeld, season 3, episode 17. Directed by Tom Cherones. Originally broadcast February 12. http://www.seinology.com/scripts/script-34.shtml (last access August 11, 2015).
Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius—The Secular as Sacred. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
Grow, Kory. 2014. “David Spade Explains Why He Didn’t Attend Chris Farley’s Funeral.” Rolling Stone. April 30. http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/david-spade-explains-why-he-didnt-attend-chris-farleys-funeral-20140430 (last access August 11, 2015).
Huxley, Aldous. 2009. The Doors of Perception, reprint. New York: HarperCollins.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2013. “Happiness in Early Chinese Thought.” In Oxford Handbook of Happiness, edited by Ilona Boniwell and Susan David. New York: Oxford University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine. 1998. “From Duty and for the Sake of the Noble.” In Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics, edited by S. Engstrom and J. Whiting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Louden, Robert B. 1997. “Kant’s Virtue Ethics.” In Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, edited by Daniel Statman. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Mehlman, Peter. 1993. “The Visa.” Seinfeld, season 4, episode 15. Directed by Tom Cherones. Originally broadcast January 27. http://www.seinology.com/scripts/script-55.shtml (last access August 11, 2015).
O’Neill, Onora. 1989. “Kant after Virtue.” In Constructions of Reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1965. “Religion and Society.” In Structure and Function in Primitive Society, reprint. New York: The Free Press.
Sartin, Catherine. 2008. “If the End Doesn’t Justify the Means then What Does?” In House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies, edited by Henry Jacoby and William Irwin. New Jersey: Wiley and Sons.
Schwartz, Benjamin. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sherman, Nancy. 1997. Making a Necessity of Virtue. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shun, Kwong-loi. 2002. “Ren 仁 and Li 禮 in the Analects.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Sim, May. 2007. Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Confucius: Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Stohr, Karen. 2012. On Manners. New York: Routledge.
Tang, Wenming 唐文明. 2012. Secret Subversion: M ou Zongsan, Kant, and Original Confucianism 隱秘的顛覆: 牟宗三、康德與原始儒家. Beijing 北京: Sanlian Shudian 三聯書店.
Tiwald, Justin, and Bryan W. Van Norden, eds. 2014. Readings in Later Chinese Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 1996. “Competing Interpretations of the Inner Chapters.” Philosophy East and West 46.2: 247–268.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 1999. “Method in the Madness of the Laozi.” In Essays on Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi, edited by Mark Csikszentmihalyi and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2008. Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2011. Introduction to Classical Chinese Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Waley, Arthur. 1918. The Poet L i Po: A. D. 761–782. Reprint, Project Gutenburg, 2013. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/43274/43274-h/43274-h.htm (last access January 7, 2014).
Wei, Cheng-t’ung. 1986. “Chu Hsi on the Standard and the Expedient.” In C hu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism, edited by Chan Wing-tsit. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Wicclair, Mark R. 2008. “House and Medical Paternalism.” In House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies, edited by Henry Jacoby and William Irwin. New Jersey: Wiley and Sons.
World Entertainment News Network. 2007. “Laurie’s Son Talked Him into Accepting OBE.” September 26. http://www.contactmusic.com/hugh-laurie/news/lauries-son-talked-him-into-accepting-obe_1044790 (last access January 18, 2016).
Yearley, Lee H. 1990. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Norden, B.W. Principles, Virtues, or Detachment? Some Appreciative Reflections on Karen Stohr’s On Manners . Dao 15, 227–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9489-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9489-7