Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ultimate Moral Arbiter, Received Tradition or Autonomous Reason? Some Questions Concerning Morality and Development in Confucian Ethics

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Shweder, Richard A. 2012. “Relativism and Universalism.” In A Companion to Moral Anthropology, edited by Didier Fassin. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, Henry. 1884. The Methods of Ethics. London: MacMillan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werker, Janet F. 1989. “Becoming a Native Listener.” American Scientist 77: 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, John W. M., and Irving Child. 1953. Child Training and Personality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Comparative Human Development, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA

    Richard A. Shweder

Authors
  1. Richard A. Shweder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Shweder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shweder, R.A. The Ultimate Moral Arbiter, Received Tradition or Autonomous Reason? Some Questions Concerning Morality and Development in Confucian Ethics. Dao 14, 219–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9436-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9436-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation