Skip to main content
Log in

Aerodynamic stability evolution tendency of suspension bridges with spans from 1000 to 5000 m

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aerodynamic instability owing to aerostatic and flutter-related failures is a significant concern in the wind-resistant design of long-span suspension bridges. Based on the dynamic characteristics of suspension bridges with spans ranging from 888 to 1991 m, we proposed fitted equations for increasing spans and base frequencies. Finite element models of suspension bridges with increasing span from 1000 to 5000 m were constructed. The structural parameters were optimized to follow the fitted tendencies. To analyze the aerodynamic instability, streamlined single-box section (SBS), lattice truss section (LTS), narrow slotted section (NSS), and wide slotted section (WSS) were considered. We performed three-dimensional (3-D) full-mode flutter analysis and nonlinear aerostatic instability analysis. The flutter critical wind speed continuously decreases with span growth, showing an unlimited approaching phenomenon. Regarding aerostatic instability, the instability wind speed decreases with span to approximately 3000 m, and increases when the span is in the range of 3000 to 5000 m. Minimum aerostatic instability wind speed with SBS or LTS girder would be lower than observed maximal gust wind speed, indicating the probability of aerostatic instability. This study proposes that suspension bridge with span approximately 3000 m should be focused on both aerostatic instability and flutter, and more aerodynamic configuration optimistic optimizations for flutter are essential for super long-span suspension bridges with spans longer than 3000 m.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katsuchi H, Jones N P, Scanlan R H, Akiyama H. Multi-mode flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi–Kaikyo Bridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998, 77–78(5): 431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldomir A, Kusano I, Hernandez S, Jurado J A. A reliability study for the Messina Bridge with respect to flutter phenomena considering uncertainties in experimental and numerical data. Computers & Structures, 2013, 128: 91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao L, Cui W, Ge Y J. Measurement, modeling and simulation of wind turbulence in typhoon outer region. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 195: 104021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang G S, Zhao L, Cao S Y, Zhu L, Ge Y. Estimation of tropical cyclone wind hazards in coastal regions of China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, 20(6): 1617–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fang G S, Pang W C, Zhao L, Cui W, Zhu L, Cao S, Ge Y. Extreme typhoon wind speed mapping for coastal region of China: Geographically weighted regression-based circular subregion algorithm. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2021, 147(10): 04021146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farquharson F B, Smith F C, Vincent G S. Aerodynamic Stability of Suspension Bridges, Parts 1–5. Seattle: University of Washington, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bleich F. Dynamic instability of truss-stiffened suspension bridges under wind action. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1948, 114(11): 1177–1222

    Google Scholar 

  8. Theodorsen T. General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter. NACA Technical Report NACA-TR-496. 1935

  9. Selberg A. Oscillation and aerodynamic stability of suspension bridges. Acte Polytechnica Scandinavien, 1961, 13: 308–377

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scanlan R H, Tomko J J. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1971, 97(6): 1717–1733

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selberg A. Aerodynamic effects on suspension bridges. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures. Teddington: H.M. Stationery Office, 1963, 462–479

    Google Scholar 

  12. van der Put. Rigidity of structures against aerodynamic forces. International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering, 1976, 36(1): 1897–196

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumoto M, Kobayashi Y, Shirato H. The influence of aerodynamic derivatives on flutter. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1996, 60(4): 227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ge Y J, Tanaka H. Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 86(2–3): 123–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen X Z, Matsumoto M, Kareem A. Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126(1): 7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Costa C, Borri C. Application of indicial functions in bridge deck aeroelasticity. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2006, 94(11): 859–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirai A, Okauchi I, Ito M, Miyata T. Studies on the critical wind velocity for suspension bridges. In: Proceedings of the International Research Seminar on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures. Ontario: University of Toronto Press, 1967, 81–103

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boonyapinyo V, Yamada H, Miyata T. Wind-induced nonlinear lateral-torsional buckling of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(2): 486–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng J, Jiang J J, Xiao R C, Xiang H F. Advanced aerostatic stability analysis of cable-stayed bridges using finite-element method. Computers & Structures, 2002, 80(13): 1145–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiang H F, Ge Y J. On aerodynamic limits to suspension bridges. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(1): 60–70 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boonyapinyo V, Lauhatanon Y, Lukkunaprasit P. Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of suspension bridges. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(5): 793–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu C X, Zhou Z Y, Jiang B S. Effects of types of bridge decks on competitive relationships between aerostatic and flutter stability for a super long cable-stayed bridge. Wind and Structures, 2019, 28(4): 255–270

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hu C X, Zhou Z Y, Yan K J. Wind-induced stability of a cable-stayed bridge with double main spans of 1500 m and a twin-box section. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2020, 25(1): 04019135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scruton C. An experimental investigation of the aerodynamic stability of suspension bridges with special reference to the proposed severn bridge. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1952, 1(2): 189–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miyata T. Significance of aero-elastic relationship in wind-resistant design of long-span bridges. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12–15): 1479–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miyata T. Historical view of long-span bridge aerodynamics. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(12–15): 1393–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kazama K, Yamada H, Miyata T. Wind resistant design for long span suspension bridges. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 54–55(94): 65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ge Y J, Xia J L, Zhao L, Zhao S. Full aeroelastic model testing for examining wind-induced vibration of a 5000 m spanned suspension bridge. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2018, 4: 20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang G Y, Zhu L D. Test on vibration characteristics of humen bridge. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 1999, 2: 194–197

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts G W, Brown C J, Meng X L, Ogundipe O, Atkins C, Colford B. Deflections and frequency monitoring of the Forth Road Bridge, Scotland, by GPS. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering, 2012, 165(2): 105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdel-Ghaffar A M, Scanlan R H. Ambient vibration studies of Golden Gate Bridge. I. Suspended structure. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1985, 111(4): 463–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu Y L, Ko J M, Zhang W S. Vibration studies of Tsing Ma Suspension Bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 1997, 2(4): 149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gu M, Zhang R X, Xiang H F. Identification of flutter derivatives of bridges in turbulent wind. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2000, 2(28): 134–137 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stephen G A, Brownjohn J M W, Taylor C A. Measurements of static and dynamic displacement from visual monitoring of the Humber Bridge. Engineering Structures, 1993, 15(3): 197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ren X D, Zheng A D. Wind-induced fatigue analysis of Yueyang Dongting Lake Suspension Bridge. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 2044(1): 012167

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li Z J, Li A Q, Han X L. Dynamic analysis and experimental study of variations of the dynamic parameters of the Runyang suspension bridge. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 4: 92–98 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee M J, Kwon H C, Shin S H. Yi Sun-sin Bridge—Design of the Long Span Suspension Bridge with Streamlined Twin Box Girder. IABSE Congress Report. 2012

  38. Larsen A. Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the Great Belt. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 48(2–3): 261–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ge Y J, Yang Y X. Detailed Research and Acceptance Report on Wind Resistance Performance of Xihoumen suspension bridge. Tongji University. 2006 (in Chinese)

  40. Zhao L, Wang Q, Song S Y, Chen W L, Wu M Y, Liao H L, Ge Y J. Investigation of wind-resistance performance of Lingdingyang Bridge with main-span 1666 m in Shen-Zhong Link. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(10): 57–66 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Xiao H Z, Zhang X Y, Xu G Y. Study of static and dynamic property of main bridge of Yangsigang Changjiang River Bridge in Wuhan. World Bridges, 2019, 47(6): 70–73 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Argentini T, Rocchi D, Somaschini C, Spinelli U, Zanelli F, Larsen A. Aeroelastic stability of a twin-box deck: Comparison of different procedures to assess the effect of geometric details. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 220: 104878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. JTG/T 3360-01-2018. Wind-resistant Design Specification for Highway Bridge. Beijing: Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, 2018 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  44. MATLAB. Natick, MA: MathWorks. 2022

  45. Zhou Z Y, Yang T. Research Report on Wind-resistant Performance of Wuhu Yangtze River Highway Second Bridge. Tongji University. 2014 (in Chinese)

  46. ANSYS Software. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS Inc. 2020

  47. Zhang X J, Sun B N. Parametric study on the aerodynamic stability of a long-span suspension bridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92(6): 431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou R, Ge Y J, Yang Y X, Du Y, Zhang L. Wind-induced nonlinear behaviors of twin-box girder bridges with various aerodynamic shapes. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2018, 94(2): 1095–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou R, Ge Y J, Yang Y X, Liu S, Du Y, Zhang L. A nonlinear numerical scheme to simulate multiple wind effects on twin-box girder suspension bridges. Engineering Structures, 2019, 183: 1072–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jain A, Jones N P, Scanlan R H. Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1996, 122(7): 716–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen X Z, Matsumoto M, Kareem A. Aerodynamic coupling effects on flutter and buffeting of bridges. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126(1): 17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hua X G, Chen Z Q, Ni Y Q, Ko J M. Flutter analysis of long-span bridges using ANSYS. Wind and Structures, 2007, 10(1): 61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ge Y J, Zhao L. Wind-excited stochastic vibration of long-span bridge considering wind field parameters during typhoon landfall. Wind and Structures, 2014, 19(4): 421–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ma T T, Zhao L, Shen X M, Ge Y. Case study of three-dimensional aeroelastic effect on critical flutter wind speed of long-span bridges. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 212: 104614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. He J Y, Li Q S, Chan P W. Reduced gust factor for extreme tropical cyclone winds over ocean. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, 208: 104445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cheng J, Jiang J J, Xiao R C, Xiang H F. Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of Jiang Yin suspension bridge. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24(6): 773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cao S Y, Tamura Y, Kikuchi N, Saito M, Nakayama I, Matsuzaki Y. Wind characteristics of a strong typhoon. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(1): 11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhou R, Ge Y J, Liu S Y, Yang Y, Du Y, Zhang L. Nonlinear flutter control of a long-span closed-box girder bridge with vertical stabilizers subjected to various turbulence flows. Thin-walled Structures, 2020, 149: 106245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhou R, Yang Y X, Ge Y J, Zhang L. Comprehensive evaluation of aerodynamic performance of twin-box girder bridges with vertical stabilizers. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 175: 317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Fang G S, Pang W C, Zhao L, Xu K, Cao S, Ge Y. Tropical-cyclone-wind-induced flutter failure analysis of long-span bridges. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 132: 105933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hu X N, Fang G S, Yang J Y, Zhao L, Ge Y. Simplified models for uncertainty quantification of extreme events using Monte Carlo technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 230: 108935

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFC3004105) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52078383, 52008314, and 52108469).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendices for

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, Y., Zhao, L., Xian, R. et al. Aerodynamic stability evolution tendency of suspension bridges with spans from 1000 to 5000 m. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 1465–1476 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0980-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0980-z

Keywords

Navigation