Skip to main content
Log in

Quality evaluation of lightweight cellular concrete by an ultrasound-based method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of subgrade quality evaluation is important for road safety assessment. Since there is little research work devoted to testing lightweight cellular concrete (LCC) by an ultrasound-based method, the quantitative relation between ultrasonic testing results and the quality of LCC subgrade is not well understood. In this paper, the quality of LCC subgrade was evaluated with respect to compressive strength and crack discrimination. The relation between ultrasonic testing results and LCC quality was explored through indoor tests. Based on the quantitative relation between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of LCC, a fitting formula was established. Moreover, after the LCC became cracked, the ultrasonic pulse velocity and ultrasonic pulse amplitude decreased. After determining the lower limiting values of the ultrasonic pulse velocity and ultrasonic pulse amplitude through the statistical data, it could be calculated whether there were cracks in LCC subgrade. The ultrasonic testing results showed that the compressive strength of the LCC subgrade was suitable for purpose and there was no crack in the subgrade. Then core samples were taken from the subgrade. Comparisons between ultrasonic testing results of subgrade and test results of core samples demonstrated a good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramamurthy K, Nambiar E K K, Ranjani G I S. A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009, 31(6): 388–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ranjani I S, Ramamurthy K. Relative assessment of density and stability of foam produced with four synthetic surfactants. Materials and Structures, 2010, 43(10): 1317–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sayadi A A, Tapia J V, Neitzert T R, Clifton G C. Effects of expanded polystyrene (EPS) particles on fire resistance, thermal conductivity and compressive strength of foamed concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 112: 716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amran Y H M, Farzadnia N, Ali A A A. Properties and applications of foamed concrete: A review. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 101(1): 990–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu X, Sheng K, Li Z, Gan L, Shan H, Hong B. Experimental research on foamed mixture lightweight soil mixed with fly-ash and quicklime as backfill material behind abutments of expressway bridge. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 2017(16): 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu X, Ni C, Meng K, Zhang L, Liu D, Sun L. Strengthening mechanism of lightweight cellular concrete filled with fly ash. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 251: 118954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jitchaiyaphum K, Sinsiri T, Jaturapitakkul C, Chindaprasirt P. Cellular lightweight concrete containing high-calcium fly ash and natural zeolite. International Journal of Minerals Metallurgy and Materials, 2013, 20(5): 462–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bing C, Zhen W, Ning L. Experimental research on properties of high-strength foamed concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2012, 24(1): 113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu C, Luo J, Li Q, Gao S, Su D, Zhang J, Chen S. Calcination of green high-belite sulphoaluminate cement (GHSC) and performance optimizations of GHSC-based foamed concrete. Materials & Design, 2019, 182: 107986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sari K A M, Sani A R M. Applications of foamed lightweight concrete. Matec Web of Conferences, 2017, 97: 01097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu X, Ni C, Ji H, Tan S, Hong B. Construction techniques and quality test and evaluation of lightweight cellular concrete mixed with fly ash as subgrade material. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 2019(4): 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kadela M, Kozlowski M, Kukielka A. Application of foamed concrete in road pavement—Weak soil system. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 193: 439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang J, Su Q, Zhao W, Li T, Zhang X. Experimental study on use of lightweight foam concrete as subgrade bed filler of ballastless track. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 149: 911–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu X, Ni C, Zhang L, Sheng K, Hong B. Durability assessment of lightweight cellular concrete in subgrade by the method of analytic hierarchy process combined with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 2019: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park D W, Vo H V. Evaluation of air-foam stabilized soil of dredged soil waste as a pavement subgrade layer. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 19(7): 2091–2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sychova A, Solomahin A, Hitrov A. The increase of the durability and geoprotective properties of the railway subgrade. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 189: 688–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qasrawi H Y. Concrete strength by combined nondestructive methods simply and reliably predicted. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(5): 739–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu L, Miramini S, Hajimohammadi A. Characterising fundamental properties of foam concrete with a non-destructive technique. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 2019, 34(1): 54–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoo K S, Kim J, Kim I B. Ultrasonic pulses characteristics in lightweight fine aggregate concrete under various load histories. Journal of the Korean Recycled Construction Resources Institute., 2014, 2(3): 209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He M, Yang T. Non-destructive evaluation of the bending-fatigue damage in carbon-fiber-composite laminates based on ultrasonic wave propagation. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2018, 46(2): 647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Demirboga R, Turkmen I, Karakoc M B. Relationship between ultrasonic velocity and compressive strength for high-volume mineral-admixtured concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(12): 2329–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haach V G, Juliani L M, Roz M R D. Ultrasonic evaluation of mechanical properties of concretes produced with high early strength cement. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 96: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Payan C, Quiviger A, Garnier V, Chaix J F, Salin J. Applying diffuse ultrasound under dynamic loading to improve closed crack characterization in concrete. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013, 134(2): 211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chai H K, Momoki S, Kobayashi Y, Aggelis D G, Shiotani T. Tomographic reconstruction for concrete using attenuation of ultrasound. NDT & E International, 2011, 44(2): 206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamid R, Yusof K M, Zain M F M. A combined ultrasound method applied to high performance concrete with silica fume. Construction & Building Materials, 2010, 24(1): 94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gul R, Demirboga R, Guvercin T. Compressive strength and ultrasound pulse velocity of mineral admixtured mortars. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 2006, 13(1): 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nogueira C L, Rens K L. Experimental analysis of cement-based materials under shear stress. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 170: 392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu S, Suorineni F T, Li K, Li Y. Evaluation of the strength and ultrasonic properties of foam-cemented paste backfill. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2017, 31(8): 544–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yilmaz T, Ercikdi B, Karaman K, Külekçi G. Assessment of strength properties of cemented paste backfill by ultrasonic pulse velocity test. Ultrasonics, 2014, 54(5): 1386–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu X, Sun D, Liu D, Meng K, Ni C, Shao Z, Sun L. Simulation of ultrasonic propagation in porous cellular concrete materials. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 285: 122852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pu S, Hong B, Liu X, Xu F, Shan H. Detection technology of foamed mixture lightweight soil embankment based on ultrasonic wave transmission method. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 2019: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51609071), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. B200202087, B200204032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Sun, D., Liao, J. et al. Quality evaluation of lightweight cellular concrete by an ultrasound-based method. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 1170–1182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0874-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0874-5

Keywords

Navigation