Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing technical expertise in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a moderate-volume center through a proctor-based team approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim is to report our preliminary experience of a proctor-based team approach in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Data was collected between December 2008 and February 2012. RALP was performed on 100 consecutive patients with prostate cancer by a team of five urologists proctored by two fellowship-trained surgeons from a single hospital. Clinical and pathological data of these patients were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 48–76). Clinical stages were 82 % cT1c, 3 % cT1b, 13 % cT2a and 2 % cT3a disease. Preoperative mean prostate-specific antigen level was 11.33 ng/ml (SD 10.47). Mean operative time was 342 min and mean blood loss was 717 ml (SD 988). Mean hospital stay and duration of the indwelling catheter were 3.2 days (SD 1.8) and 12.6 days (SD 8.5), respectively. Pathological staging showed 65 patients with pT2a (65 %) disease and 33 patients with pT3a (33 %) disease. Thirty-five patients (35 %) had positive surgical margins. Eighteen patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall postoperative complication rate was 14 %. There were six Clavien grade 1 complications, seven Clavien grade 2 complications and one Clavien grade 3 complication. At mean follow-up of 36 months, 100 % of patients remained free of biochemical recurrence with continence at 70 %. Our proctor-based team approach will continue to improve each surgeon’s technical competency. He or she will continue to improve and gradually move on to achieving his or her outcomes learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singapore Cancer Registry Interim Report (2010) Trends in cancer incidence in Singapore 2004–2008. Singapore Cancer Registry

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58:71–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Basler JW (1993) Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening. JAMA 270:948–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Frota R, Turna B, Barros R, Gill IS (2008) Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted. Int Braz J Urol 34:259–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hakimi A, Feder M, Ghavamian R (2007) Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer. A review of the current literature. Urol J 4:130–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh I, Hemal AK (2010) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 10:671–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr (2005) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology 66:105–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Amico AV, Cote K, Loffredo M, Renshaw AA, Schultz D (2002) Determinants of prostate cancer specific survival after radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:4567–4573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M et al (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51:648–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sundaram CP, Koch MO, Gardner T, Bernie JE (2005) Utility of the fourth arm to facilitate robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 95:183–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643–1649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV (2003) Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 61:699–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sur RL, Wagner AA, Albala DM, Su LM (2008) Critical role of the assistant in laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 22:587–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel VR, Kenneth JP, Coughlin G, Samavedi S (2008) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 22:2299–2305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stolzenburg JU, Qazi HAR, Holze S, Mende M, Nicolaus M, Franz T (2013) Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 27:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Tewari A (2003) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: a single-team experience of 100 cases. J Endourol 17:785–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W (2007) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J, Walsh PC (1996) Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 20:286–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan YH, Wong MY, Cheng CW (2006) Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 13:560–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan JK, Cheng CW (2004) Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Surg 27:321–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yip SKh, Sim HG (2010) Robotic radical prostatectomy in East Asia: development, surgical results and challenges. Curr Opin Urol 20:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM (2011) Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol 185:1191–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis JW, Kamat A, Munsell M, Pettaway C, Pisters L, Matin S (2010) Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized? BJU Int 105:1148–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rashid HH, Leung YY, Rashid MJ, Oleyourryk G, Valvo JR, Eichel L (2006) Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 68:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, Clayman RV, Ahlering TE, Albala DM (2009) Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol 182:1126–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Dr. Shieh Ling Bang: no conflict of interest. Dr. Keng Siang Png: no conflict of interest. Dr. Yu Yi Yeow: no conflict of interest. Dr. Gerald Yau Min Tan: no conflict of interest. Dr. Yew Lam Chong: no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yew Lam Chong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bang, S.L., Png, K.S., Yeow, Y.Y. et al. Developing technical expertise in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a moderate-volume center through a proctor-based team approach . J Robotic Surg 8, 245–250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0460-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0460-5

Keywords

Navigation