Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, we have introduced robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in Japan. This article describes the details of a training program to shorten the learning curve in the absence of an urologist with expertise in robotic surgery. Five months after a 2-day training course of robotic surgery, RALP was first performed in Japan, and a total of 15 cases were performed in the subsequent 4 months. Our training program consisted of: (1) image training using surgical operation videos, (2) dry lab training using a sham pelvic cavity model, and (3) intraoperative mentoring. The operative procedure was divided into five consecutive stages, and time required to complete each stage was recorded. Robotic radical prostatectomy was completed in all patients without conversion to open surgery, except for the first patient in whom a restriction to a 2-h operation had been imposed by the ethics committee. The mean console time and the mean intraoperative blood loss (including urine) reduced from 264.2 min and 459.4 ml, respectively, in the first 11 cases, to 151 min and 133.3 ml, respectively, in the last three cases. With direct intraoperative guidance by the mentor during cases 13 and 14, the operation time was reduced at all five stages of the operative procedure. Our training program proved remarkably effective in reducing the learning curve of RALP in Japan, where there is no person with expertise in robotic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schuessler WW, Schlam PG, Clayman RV et al (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short term experience. Urology 50:854–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 163:418–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sulser T, Guillonneau B, Vallancian G et al (2001) Complications and initial experience with 1,228 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at six European centers. J Urol 165 (Suppl):150 (abstract 615)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M et al (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169:1689–1693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tooher R, Swindle P, Woo H et al (2006) Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systemic review of comparative studies. J Urol 175:2011–2017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T et al (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy—the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 49:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahl DM, Lesperance JO, Trainer AF et al (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 70 cases at a US university medical center. Urology 60:859–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farouk A, Gill I, Kaouk J et al (2002) 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (LRP): learning curve in the United States. J Urol suupl 167:390 (abstract 1552)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D et al (2006) Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy—clitical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 49:612–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D et al (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:1738–1741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a atructured program and preliminary analisis of outcome. J Urol 168:945–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK et al (2004) Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Surg 27(4):321–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sim HG, Yip S, Lau W et al (2006) Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 13:560–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R et al (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting—the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174:269–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Menon M, Tewari A, Peaboy J et al (2003) Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 169:2289–2292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ficarra E, Cavalleri S, Novara G et al (2007) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ei-Hakirn A, Leung RA, Tewari A (2006) Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6(1):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown JA, Lewis RW (2006) A multi-institution, minimally invasive urological oncology fellowship: a critical assessment of the clinical training and academic benefits. J Urol 176:2619–2623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rashid HH, Leung YM, Rashid MJ et al (2006) Robotic surgical education: a systemic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 68:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al (2004) Vattikuti institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1,100 cases. Urol Clin N Am 31:701–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1, Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan

    K. Yoshioka, T. Hatano, Y. Nakagami, C. Ozu, Y. Horiguchi, H. Yonou & M. Tachibana

  2. Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    G. Coughlin & V. R. Patel

Authors
  1. K. Yoshioka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Hatano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Nakagami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Ozu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Y. Horiguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Yonou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Tachibana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. G. Coughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. V. R. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Yoshioka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshioka, K., Hatano, T., Nakagami, Y. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan. J Robotic Surg 2, 85–88 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-008-0087-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-008-0087-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation