Skip to main content
Log in

Pneumatic Balloon Dilation of Gastric Sleeve Stenosis Is Not Associated with Weight Regain

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) occurs in up to 4% of patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Typical symptoms include reflux, abdominal pain, dysphagia, and regurgitation. Serial pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD) is a successful treatment in many cases obviating the need for revisional surgery, but the potential for weight regain is unknown. The aim of the current study was to assess weight trends following serial pneumatic dilation for GSS.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing serial PBD for GSS at one institution. Primary outcome was change in BMI before and after serial PBD. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and need for revisional surgery. Sub-group analyses were performed to determine the relationship of patient and procedural factors to BMI after PBD.

Results

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria, 34 (84.1%) women. Mean age was 46.7 (SD 11.9). Mean pre-sleeve BMI was 47.8 (SD 9.2), and mean BMI prior to first dilation was 34.2 (SD 6.8). Median follow-up was 395 days (range 48–571). Mean BMI at time of last follow up was 33.7 (SD 6.7). There was no statistical difference in BMI pre- or post-PBD (p 0.980). The lowest 10th and highest 90th BMI percentile trended toward a higher and lower BMI after PBD, respectively, though not significant.

Discussion

As the prevalence of sleeve gastrectomy continues to rise, an increasing number of patients will require treatment for GSS. Stenosis is effectively treated with serial PBD in most patients without any impact on weight gain, making this an effective and appealing option for many patients.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089298765554476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 1993;3(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089293765559728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16(9):1138–44. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206778392275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gagner M, Deitel M, Kalberer TL, et al. The second international consensus summit for sleeve gastrectomy, March 19–21, 2009. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(4):476–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. ASMBS. Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2018. Available from: asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers.

  6. Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the fourth IFSO global registry report 2018. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):782–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3593-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gagner M, Kemmeter P. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):396–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parikh A, Alley JB, Peterson RM, et al. Management options for symptomatic stenosis after laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):738–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1945-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lacy A, Ibarzabal A, Pando E, et al. Revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(5):351–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181f62895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deslauriers V, Beauchamp A, Garofalo F, et al. Endoscopic management of post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy stenosis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):601–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5709-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manos T, Nedelcu M, Cotirlet A, et al. How to treat stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):150–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.08.491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Levy JL, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, et al. Stenosis of gastric sleeve after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: clinical, radiographic and endoscopic findings. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1089):20170702. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shnell M, Fishman S, Eldar S, et al. Balloon dilatation for symptomatic gastric sleeve stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(3):521–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogra R, Kini GP. Evolving endoscopic management options for symptomatic stenosis post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: experience at a large bariatric surgery unit in New Zealand. Obes Surg. 2015;25(2):242–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1383-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rebibo L, Hakim S, Dhahri A, et al. Gastric stenosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: diagnosis and management. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1883-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donatelli G, Dumont JL, Pourcher G, et al. Pneumatic dilation for functional helix stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up (with videos). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(6):943–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.09.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nath A, Yewale S, Tran T, et al. Dysphagia after vertical sleeve gastrectomy: evaluation of risk factors and assessment of endoscopic intervention. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(47):10371–9. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Al Sabah S, Al Haddad E, Siddique I. Endoscopic management of post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy stenosis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3559–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5385-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy–influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007;17(10):1297–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9232-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noel P, Nedelcu M, Nocca D, et al. Revised sleeve gastrectomy: another option for weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(4):1096–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3277-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhalla S, Yu JX, Varban OA, et al. Upper gastrointestinal series after sleeve gastrectomy is unnecessary to evaluate for gastric sleeve stenosis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(2):631–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07426-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu JX, Dolan RD, Bhalla S, et al. Quantification of gastric sleeve stenosis using endoscopic parameters and image analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(6):1344–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iannelli A, Martini F, Schneck AS, et al. Twisted gastric sleeve. Surgery. 2015;157(1):163–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.01.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park JV, Sievers MT, Rollins PD, et al. Quantifying healthcare utilization and delay in the treatment of gastric stenosis following sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2022;32(1):90–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05704-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu JX, Baker JR, Watts L, et al. Functional lumen imaging probe is useful for the quantification of gastric sleeve stenosis and prediction of response to endoscopic dilation: a pilot study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):786–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04105-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brunaldi VO, Galvao Neto M, Zundel N, et al. Isolated sleeve gastrectomy stricture: a systematic review on reporting, workup, and treatment. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(7):955–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang SH, Popov VB, Thompson CC. Endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of sleeve gastrectomy stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(5):989-1002.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saliba C, El Rayes J, Diab S, et al. Weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy: a look at the benefits of re-sleeve. Cureus. 2018;10(10):e3450. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. AlSabah S, Alsharqawi N, Almulla A, et al. Approach to poor weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: re-sleeve vs. gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2302–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2119-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: LM, JXY, ARS. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: LM, JXY, LW, SV, ARS. Statistical analysis: JXY, ARS. Drafting of the manuscript: LM, JXY, ARS. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: LM, JXY, SB, KP, ARS. Study supervision: ARS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison R. Schulman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement of Informed Consent

Does not apply.

Conflict of Interest

Laura Mazer, Jessica X Yu, Sean Bhalla, Kevin Platt, Lydia Watts, and Sarah Volk have no conflicts to disclose. Allison R. Schulman is a Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, MicroTech, and Olympus, and receives Research/Grant support from GI Dynamics.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

- Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) following sleeve gastrectomy most commonly at the incisura and has an increasing prevalence

- Patients frequently present with abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, dysphagia, or reflux

- Endoscopic pneumatic balloon dilation is emerging as a first-line therapy for GSS that may prevent the need for revisional surgery, but data on weight change is lacking

- Here, we demonstrate that there is no significant change in body mass index (BMI) before and after dilation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazer, L., Yu, J.X., Bhalla, S. et al. Pneumatic Balloon Dilation of Gastric Sleeve Stenosis Is Not Associated with Weight Regain. OBES SURG 32, 1–6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05957-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05957-6

Keywords

Navigation