Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Presurgical Predictive Factors of Excess Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Conditions associated with surgical technique and postoperative lifestyle changes, as well as the characteristics of patients, may affect weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. In this study, the effects of age, gender, BMI, and excess weight at the time of surgery on weight loss during follow-up were examined.

Materials and Methods

Demographic data (age, gender), preoperative BMI, and weight values of the patients were recorded. TWL% and EWL% values of patients were recorded during follow-up at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, and 18th months. Patients were grouped according to age (AGE1 < 30, AGE2 30–50, AGE3 ≥ 50 years), BMI at the time of surgery (BMI1 ≤ 50, BMI2 > 50 kg/m2), and EW at the time of surgery (EW1 ≤ 60, EW2 > 60 kg). EWL% values obtained in the follow-up visits were compared among the gender, age, BMI, and EW groups.

Results

A total of 456 patients (371 females, 85 males) were operated. Mean EWL% was lower in AGE3 group (p < 0.001). Patients in AGE1 group had the highest mean EWL%, while those in BMI2 and EW2 groups had lower mean EWL% values throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that age and BMI were associated with EWL% at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with less than 60 kg of excess weight, those with BMI ≤ 50 kg/m2 and younger patients may lose weight more effectively following LSG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(41):1–190. 215–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003641.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang K, Jiang Q, Zhi Y, et al. Contrasting sleeve gastrectomy with lifestyle modification therapy in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(6):493–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0511. Epub 2015 May 8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Capristo E, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Intensive lifestyle modifications with or without liraglutide 3mg vs. sleeve gastrectomy: a three-arm non-randomised, controlled, pilot study. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44(3):235–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2017.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Yi X, Gong L, et al. The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with different sizes of bougie calibration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;49:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuval JB, Mintz Y, Cohen MJ, et al. The effects of bougie caliber on leaks and excess weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Is there an ideal Bougie size? Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1685–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1047-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenthal RJ, International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdallah E, El Nakeeb A, Yousef T, et al. Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study). Obes Surg. 2014;24:1587–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):528–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Yi X, Li Q, et al. The effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy in the obese elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):3023–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giordano S, Victorzon M. Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1627–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Burchett MA, McKenna DT, Selzer DJ, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is safe and effective in elderly patients: a comparative analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(12):222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.20897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Leivonen MK, Juuti A, Jaser N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients over 59 years: early recovery and 12-month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1180–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0454-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabench Pereferrer F, Molina López A, Vives Espelta M, et al. Weight loss analysis according to different formulas after sleeve gastrectomy with or without antral preservation: a randomised study. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1254–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2454-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Weight loss outcomes in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(1):8–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perrone F, Bianciardi E, Benavoli D, et al. Gender influence on long-term weight loss and comorbidities after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective study with a 5-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1746-z.

  19. Ockell J, Elander A, Staalesen T, et al. Evaluation of excess skin in Swedish adults 18-59 years of age. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(2):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2016.1187157. Epub 2016 Jun 10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kakoulidis TP, Karringer A, Gloaguen T, et al. Initial results with sleeve gastrectomy for patients with class I obesity (BMI 30-35 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(4):425–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Sep 26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Puzziferri N, Roshek TB, Mayo HG, et al. Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(9):934–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.10706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lauti M, Kularatna M, Hill AG, et al. Weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy-a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(6):1326–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2152-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Lanzarini E, et al. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an acceptable primary bariatric procedure in obese patients? Early and 5-year postoperative results. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(6):479–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e318262dc29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Sırma Tilev for assistance in the editing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Sisik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethics committee approval was obtained for this study.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sisik, A., Basak, F. Presurgical Predictive Factors of Excess Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 30, 2905–2912 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04624-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04624-y

Keywords

Navigation