Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic Magenstrasse and Mill Gastroplasty (M&M): Midterm Results

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Magenstrasse and Mill gastroplasty (M&M) is a gastric restrictive procedure without band or stomach resection. Short-term evaluation of the laparoscopic procedure showed low morbidity and satisfactory results on weight loss. Evidence of the validity of the technique in the longer term is scarce.

Methods

Data from patients who underwent M&M procedure from May 2012 to September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative clinical characteristics and data up to 4 years after operation were analyzed.

Results

A total of 132 patients were included in this study with a mean age of 46 ± 13.4 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of procedure was 43 ± 4.5 kg/m2. Mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 67, 67, 58, and 57% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. The remission rate for diabetes was 36%. About half of the insulin-dependent patients could stop their insulin treatment. Hypertension was resolved in 33.8% of the patients after 4 years. Incidence of vitamin and mineral deficiency was low throughout the study period, less than or equal to 3% for vitamin B12 and 1% for ferritin. Incidence of gastroesophageal reflux did not exceed 15% during the study. Over 75% of the patients reported a good or very good quality of life following the surgery.

Conclusion

These results confirm the validity of M&M as a bariatric procedure. The low incidence of vitamin deficiencies and gastroesophageal reflux might be the important asset of M&M over other existing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee A, Ding Y, Mikami DJ, et al. The role of dumping syndrome in weight loss after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1573–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iannelli A, Facchiano E, Gugenheim J. Internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Andalib A, et al. Trends in utilization of bariatric surgery, 2010-2014: sleeve gastrectomy dominates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:774–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Guarino S, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared with other bariatric surgical procedures: a systematic review of randomized trials. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:816–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer L, Hildebrandt C, Bruckner T, et al. Excessive weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22:721–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yip S, Plank LD, Murphy R. Gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1994–2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pellitero S, Martínez E, Puig R, et al. Evaluation of vitamin and trace element requirements after sleeve gastrectomy at long term. Obes Surg. 2017 Jul;27:1674–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oor JE, Roks DJ, Ünlü Ç, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016 Jan;211:250–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Villagrán R, Smith G, Rodriguez, et al. Portomesenteric vein thrombosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: incidence, analysis and follow-up in 1236 consecutive cases. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2555–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston D, Dachtler J, Sue-Ling HM, et al. The Magenstrasse and Mill operation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2003;13:10–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Roover A, Kohnen L, Deflines J, et al. Laparoscopic Magenstrasse and Mill gastroplasty: first results of a prospective study. Obes Surg. 2015;25:234–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carmichael AR, Johnston D, Bury RF, et al. Gastric emptying after a new, more physiological anti-obesity operation: the Magenstrasse and Mill procedure. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28(9):1379–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carmichael AR, Johnston D, King RF, et al. Effects of the Magenstrasse and Mill operation for obesity on plasma leptin and insulin resistance. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2001;3:99–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Yi XY, Gong LL, et al. The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with different sizes of bougie calibration : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;49:32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghio B, Jiménez A, Corcelles R, et al. Midterm effects of bariatric surgery in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:2004–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holter MM, Dutia R, Stano SM, et al. Glucose metabolism after gastric banding and gastric bypass in individuals with type 2 diabetes: weight loss effect. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:7–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G L, Xu C, Campo RE, et al. Predictors of short-term diabetes remission after laparoscopic Roux-enY gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25:782–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JY, Kim YJ. Prediction of diabetes remission in morbidly obese patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26:749–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Souteiro P, Belo S, Neves JS, et al. Preoperative beta cell function is predictive of diabetes remission after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27:288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang GF, Yan YX, Xu N, et al. Predictive factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus remission following bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz-Tovar J, Llavero, C, Zubiaga, et al. Maintenance of multivitamin supplements after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2016;26:2324–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Viscido G, Gorodner V, Signorini F, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: endoscopic findings and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms at 18-month follow-up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(1):71–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Althuwaini S, Bamehriz F, Aldohayan, et al. Prevalence and predictors of gastroesophageal reflux disease after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2018;28:916–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coupaye M, Gorbatchef C, Calabrese D, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective mechanistic study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):838–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Carmichael AR, Sue-Ling HM, Johnston D. Quality of life after the Magenstrasse and Mill procedure for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2001;11:708–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ece I, Yilmaz H, Alptekin H, et al. Port site hernia after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 352 patients. Updat Surg. 2018;70:91–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scozzari G, Toppino M, Famiglietti F, et al. 10-year follow-up of laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty. Good results in selected patients. Ann Surg. 2010;252:831–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suter M, Jayet C, Jayet A. Vertical banded gastroplasty: long term results comparing three different techniques. Obes Surg. 2000;10:41–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. De Lartigue G, Diepenbroek C. Novel developments in vagal afferent nutrient sensing and its role in energy homeostasis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2016;31:38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maud Neuberg.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 4
figure 4

Moorehead-Ardelt questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neuberg, M., Wuidar, PA., Kohnen, L. et al. Laparoscopic Magenstrasse and Mill Gastroplasty (M&M): Midterm Results. OBES SURG 29, 3212–3219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03965-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03965-7

Keywords

Navigation