Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychological Assessments of Bariatric Surgery Patients. Development, Reliability, and Exploratory Factor Analysis of the PsyBari

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery patients are required to receive psychological clearance before they are eligible for surgery. In spite of this, there are no standard assessment practices or tests designed specifically for these evaluations.

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and construct validity of the PsyBari, a psychological test designed for bariatric surgery patients.

Methods

The PsyBari was administered to 752 patients. Internal consistency reliability and exploratory factor analyses were conducted.

Results

Items with high percentages of missing data, low communalities, and low item loadings were identified and deleted. Cronbach’s α = 0.930 (0.940 for males and 0.927 for females). Six factors were obtained for each gender: for females, awareness of eating habits, early life problems due to weight, dysphoric feelings about weight, weight-related impairment, surgical anxiety, and guilty feelings related to eating; for males, physical impairment with depression, awareness of eating habits, early life problems due to weight, interpersonal support with anxiety about weight, anger, and guilty feelings about eating habits.

Conclusions

Results indicate that there are unique psychometric parameters when constructing tests for bariatric surgery patients. The PsyBari has good overall reliability, although two of the 11 subscales have poor reliability. Factor analyses revealed six factors for each gender. Some factors were common for both genders, some were unique for each gender, and some consisted of mixed constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:956–61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vallis TM, Ross MA. The role of psychological factors in bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: identification of psychological predictors of success. Obes Surg. 2007;3:346–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maddi SR, Fox SR, Harvey RH, et al. Reduction in psychopathology following bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2001;11:680–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Averbukh Y, Heshka S, El-Shoreya H, et al. Depression score predicts weight loss following roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13:833–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O’Brien PE. Depression in association with severe obesity. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2058–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buser A, Dymek-Valentine M, Hilburger J, et al. Outcome following gastric bypass surgery: impact of past sexual abuse. Obes Surg. 2004;14:170–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ray EC, Nickels NW, Sayeed S, et al. Predicting success after gastric bypass: the role of psychosocial and behavioral factors. Surg. 2003;134:555–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. New eng jour of med. 2007;357:753–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Omalu BI, Ives DG, Buhari AM, et al. Death rates and causes of death after bariatric surgery for Pennsylvania residents, 1995 to 2004. Arch Surg. 2007;142:923–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauchowitz AU, Gonder-Frederick LA, Olbrisch ME, et al. Psychosocial evaluation of bariatric surgery candidates: a survey of present practices. Psych Med. 2005;67:825–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabricatore A, Crerand C, Wadden T, Sarwer D, Krasucki J. How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results. Obes Surg. 2006;16:567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walfish S, Vance D, Fabricatore AN. Psychological evaluation of bariatric surgery applicants: procedures and reasons for delay or denial of surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1578–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Millon T, Antoni M, Millon C, Minor S, Grossman G. MBMD manual supplement: bariatric report. Minneapolis, MN, USA: NCS Pearson; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walfish S, Wise D, Streiner D. Limitations of the Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic (MBMD) with bariatric surgical candidtates. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1381–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahony D (2009) www.psybari.com

  16. Libeton M, Dixon JB, Laurie C, et al. Patient motivation for bariatric surgery: characteristics and impact on outcome. Obes Surg. 2007;14:392–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Munoz DJ, Lal M, Chen EY, et al. Why patients seek bariatric surgery: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of patient motivation. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strommen M, Kulseng B, Vedul-Kjelsas E, et al. Bariatric surgery or lifestyle intervention? An exploratory study of severely obese patients’ motivation for two different treatments. Obes Res Clin Prac. 2009;3:193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer S, Chen E, Katterman S, et al. Emotional eating in a morbidly obese bariatric surgery seeking population. Obes Surg. 2007;17:778–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guerdjikova AI, West-Smith L, McElroy SL, et al. Emotional eating and emotional eating alternative in subjects undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1091–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Konttinen H, Haukkala A, Sarlio-Lahteenkorva S, et al. Eating styles, self-control and obesity indicators. The moderating role of obesity status and dieting history on restrained eating. Appet. 2009;53:131–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Niego SG, Kofman MD, Weiss JJ, et al. Binge eating in the bariatric surgery population: a review of the literature. Inter Jour of Eat Dis. 2007;40:349–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Allison K, Wadden T, Sarwer D, et al. Night eating syndrome and binge eating disorder among persons seeking bariatric surgery: prevalence and related features. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2007;2:153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fabricatore AN, Wadden TA, Sarwer DB, et al. Health-related quality of life and symptoms of depression in extremely obese persons seeking bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15:304–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Naslund I, Agren G. Social and economic effects of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 1991;1:137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ertelt T, Mitchell J, Lancaster K, et al. Alcohol abuse an dependence before and after bariatric surgery: a review of the literature and report of a new data set. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2008;4:647–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Odom J, Washington T, Zalesin K, et al. Alcohol consumption patterns after bariatric surgery. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2008;4:374–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ren JC, Cabrera I, Rajaram K, et al. Factors influencing patient choice for bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2007;15:202–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics 5th Ed. Boston: Pearson; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mahony D. Psychological gender differences in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg. 2008;18:607–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fabrigar LR, Wegener ET, MacCullum RC, et al. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psych Meth. 1999;4:272–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. SPSS Inc. SPSS for Windows, Rel. 12.01. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2003

  33. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Prac Assess Res & Eval. 2005;10:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sapnas K, Zeller R. Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement. J of Nur Meas. 2002;10:135–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Darmon N, Khlat M. An overview of the health status of migrants in France, in relation to their dietary practices. Pub Heal Nut. 2001;4:163–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Lutheran Medical Center, 150 55 St. Suite 5333, Brooklyn, NY, 11220, USA

    David Mahony

Authors
  1. David Mahony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Mahony.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahony, D. Psychological Assessments of Bariatric Surgery Patients. Development, Reliability, and Exploratory Factor Analysis of the PsyBari. OBES SURG 21, 1395–1406 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0108-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0108-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation