Skip to main content
Log in

The relation of pear volume and it’s bruised volume by CT scan imaging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research deals with the investigation of the relationship between the amount of the pears’ bruise subject to loading force and the volume of pears during the storage period. The selected pears were subjected to Quasi-static loading (wide edge and thin edge plates) and 5, 10, and 15-day storing durations were chosen for the investigation of the exerted force’s impact. The volume of pears and the bruise percentages were calculated before and after loading using the nondestructive CT-scan method. The bruise percentage was measured by dividing the bruise volume by the pear volume. The experiments result indicated that there is a positive correlation between the pear volume before loading and the bruise percentage for the wide edge and thin edge loading and that the more the volume of the pears the more the bruise percentage will be increased. The amount of loading force and the storage duration were not found having much of an influence on the bruise percentage for the pears that had been subjected to loading using thin-edge jaws and 5-day storage duration. The bruise percentage was observable for the 10-day storage duration. Also, no significant effect was evidenced for the 5-day storage duration of the pears that had been subjected to wide-edge plates’ loading for rates equal to 70 and below. But, the use of the same loading force, though being trivial, could be observed for the 10-day storage duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Massah, F. Hajiheydari, M.H. Derafshi, J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 19, 1031 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Hazbavi, M.H. Khoshtaghaza, A. Mostaan, A. Banakar, J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 14, 140 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Sabzi, P. Javadikia, H. Rabani, A. Adelkhani, Measurement 46, 3333 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Shahbazi, S. Rahmati, Food Nutr. Sci. 4, 1 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Firatligil-Durmuş, E. Šárka, Z. Bubník, M. Schejbal, P. Kadlec, J. Food Eng. 99, 445 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Ghabel, A. Rajabipour, M. Oveisi, Res. Agric. Eng. 56, 33 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Tarighi, S. Dadashi, M.A. Ghazvini, A. Mahmoudi, Agric. Eng. Int. 13, 1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.N. Lorestani, M. Ghari, Sci. Hortic. 133, 6 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. U.L. Opara, P.B. Pathare, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 91, 9 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Babic, S. Matic-Kekic, N. Dedovic, M. Babic, I. Pavkov, Int. J. Food Prop. 15, 880 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Mohammad Shafie, A. Rajabipour, S. Castro-García, F. Jiménez-Jiménez, H. Mobli, Int. J. Food Prop. 18, 1837 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Gharaghani, S. Shahkoomahally, Iran Agric. Res. 37, (2018)

  13. T. Saracoglu, N. Ucer, C. Ozarslan, Int. J. Agric. Biol. 13, 801 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Vintila, D. Veringa, in 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2015 (2015), pp. 529–536

  15. M. Azadbakht, M. Vehedi Torshizi, H. Aghili, A. Ziaratban, Carpath. J. Food Sci. Technol. 10, 96 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Diels, M. van Dael, J. Keresztes, S. Vanmaercke, P. Verboven, B. Nicolai, W. Saeys, H. Ramon, B. Smeets, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 128, 24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D.S. Johnson, C.J. Dover, in International Conference on Agricultural Mechanization (1990)

  18. S. Zarifneshat, H.R. Ghassemzadeh, M. Sadeghi, M.H. Abbaspour-Fard, E. Ahmadi, A. Javadi, M.T. Shervani-Tabar, Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 5, 114 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Azadbakht.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azadbakht, M., Vahedi Torshizi, M. & Mahmoodi, M.J. The relation of pear volume and it’s bruised volume by CT scan imaging. Food Measure 13, 1089–1099 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-00024-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-00024-0

Keywords

Navigation