Skip to main content
Log in

Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy: An Islamic Perspective

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mitochondrial replacement technology (MRT) is an emerging and complex bioethical issue. This treatment aims to eliminate maternal inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disorders. For Muslims, its introduction affects every aspect of human life, especially the five essential interests of human beings—namely, religion, life, lineage, intellect, and property. Thus, this technology must be assessed using a comprehensive and holistic approach addressing these human essential interests. Consequently, this article analyses and assesses tri-parent baby technology from the perspective of Maqasidic bioethics—that is, Islamic bioethics based on the framework of Maqasid al-Shariah. Using this analysis, this article suggests that tri-parent baby technology should not be permitted for Muslims due to the existence of third-party cell gametes which lead to lineage mixing and due to the uncertain safety of the therapy itself and because the major aim of the technology is to fulfil the affected couples interest to conceive their own genetically healthy child, not to treat and cure mtDNA disorders sufferers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. subhanahu wa ta'ala (The most glorified, the most high)

References

  • Adi Setia. 2015. Freeing maqāṣid & maṣlaḥah from surreptitious utilitarianism. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Applications of Maqasid Al-Shari’ah (Objectives Of The Shari’ah) in Governance and Public Policy, Kuala Lumpur.

  • Allahbadia, G.N. 2015. Is the world of ART ready for a Ménage à Trois? The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 65(2): 71–74.

  • Amato, P., M. Tachibana, M. Sparman, and S. Mitalipov. 2014. Three-parent in vitro fertilization: Gene replacement for the prevention of inherited mitochondrial diseases. Fertility and Sterility 101(1): 31–35.

  • Arbach, O. 2002. Ethical considerations in Syria regarding reproduction techniques. Medicine and Law 21(2): 395–401.

  • Atighetchi, D. 2000. Islamic tradition and medically assisted reproduction. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 169(1–2): 137–141.

  • al-Buti, M.S.R. 1973. Dawabit al-maslahah fi al-Shari’ah al-Islamiyyah. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.

  • Baylis, F. 2017. Human nuclear genome transfer (so-called mitochondrial replacement): Clearing the underbrush. Bioethics 31(1): 7–19

  • ———. 2013. The ethics of creating children with three genetic parents. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 26(6): 531–534.

  • Bender, K., P.M. Schneider, and C. Rittner. 2000. Application of mtDNA sequence analysis in forensic casework for the identification of human remains. Forensic Science International 113(1–3): 103–107.

  • Bouzenita, A.I., M.ES. Mirghani, and I. Jaswir. 2017. The Islamic ethics of mitochondria transplantation. IIUM Engineering Journal 18(2): 42–46.

  • Bredenoord, A.L., W. Dondorp, G. Pennings, C.E.M. De Die-Smulders, and G. De Wert. 2008. PGD to reduce reproductive risk: The case of mitochondrial DNA disorders. Human Reproduction 23(11): 2392–2401.

  • Bredenoord, A.L., and P. Braude. 2011. Ethics of mitochondrial gene replacement: From bench to bedside. BMJ 342: 87–89.

  • Claiborne, A., R. English, and J. Kahn. 2016. Mitochondrial replacement techniques: Ethical, social, and policy considerations. Washington: The National Academies Press.

  • Coble, M.D., O.M. Loreille, M.J. Wadhams, et al. 2009. Mystery solved: The identification of the two missing Romanov children using DNA analysis. PLoS ONE 4(3): e4838.

  • Craven, L., H.A. Tuppen, G.D. Greggains, et al. 2010. Pronuclear transfer in human embryos to prevent transmission of mitochondrial DNA disease. Nature 465(7294): 82–87.

  • Cree, L., and L. Pasqualino. 2015. Mitochondrial replacement: From basic research to assisted reproductive technology portfolio tool-technicalities and possible risks. Molecular Human Reproduction 21(1): 3–10.

  • Darnovsky, M. 2013. A slippery slope to human germline modification. Nature 499(127): 127.

  • Department of Health. 2014. Mitochondrial Donation: Government response to the consultation on draft regulations to permit the use of new treatment techniques to prevent the transmission of a serious mitochondrial disease from mother to child. London: Department of Health. Diakses Ogos 4, 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332881/Consultation_response.pdf.

  • Dimond, R. 2015. Social and ethical issues in mitochondrial donation. British Medical Bulletin 115(1): 173–182.

  • Ebrahim, A.F.M. 1988. Biomedical issues: Islamic perspective. Kuala Lumpur: A.S. Noordeen.

  • Farnezi, H., A. Goulart, A. dos Santos, M. Ramos, and M. Penna. 2020. Three-parent babies: Mitochondrial replacement therapies. JBRA Assisted Reproduction 2020 24(2): 189–196.

  • Frankel, M., and A. Chapman. 2000. Human inheritable genetic modifications: Assessing scientific, ethical, religious, and policy issues. Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

  • Gill, P., P. Ivanov, C. Kimpton, et al. 1994. Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis. Nature Genetics 6(2): 130–135.

  • Haimes, E., and K. Taylor. 2015. Rendered invisible? The absent presence of egg providers in U.K. debates on the acceptability of research and therapy for mitochondrial disease. Monash Bioethics Review 33(4): 360–378.

  • Hamzelou, J. 2016. Exclusive: World’s first baby born with new “3 parent” technique. 27 September. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2107219-exclusive-worlds-first-baby-born-with-new-3-parent-technique/.

  • Hashi, A.A. 2018. Bioethics: A comparative study of its concept, issues and approaches. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press.

  • Hellebrekers, D., R. Wolfe, A. Hendrickx, et al. 2012. PGD and heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA point mutations: A systematic review estimating the chance of healthy offspring. Human Reproduction Update 18(4): 341–349.

  • Herbrand, C. 2017. Mitochondrial replacement techniques: Who are the potential users and will they benefit? Bioethics 31(1): 46–54.

  • Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. 2005. HFEA grants licence to Newcastle Centre at LIFE for Mitochondrial Research. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. September 8. Diakses Ogos 4, 2014. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/671.html.

  • ———. 2014. Third scientific review of the safety and efficacy of methods to avoid mitochondrial disease through assisted conception: 2014 update. London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

  • Ibrahim, A.H., N.N.A. Rahman, and S.M. Saifuddeen. 2016. Advances in tri-parent baby technology: The bioethical challenge for Muslims. In Islamic perspectives on science and technology: Selected conference papers, edited by M.H. Kamali, O. Bakar, D. Batchelor and R. Hashim, 289–299. Singapore: Springer Singapore.

  • Ibrahim, A.H., N.N.A. Rahman, S.M. Saifuddeen, and M. Baharuddin. 2019a. Maqasid al-Shariah based Islamic bioethics: A comprehensive approach. Bioethical Inquiry 16(3): 333–345.

  • ———. 2019b. Tri-parent baby technology and preservation of lineage: An analysis from the perspective of Maqasid al-Shari’ah based Islamic bioethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 25(1): 129–142.

  • Inhorn, M. 2006. Making Muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30(4): 427–450.

  • International Islamic Fiqh Academy. 2021. Resolutions and recommendations of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy: Sessions 2-24 Resolutions 1-238. Vol. 2nd. Jeddah: International Islamic Fiqh Academy.

  • Iqbal, M. 2012. Access to assisted human reproductive technologies in the light of Islamic ethics. Thesis Ph.D. University College London, London.

  • Islam, S. 2013. Ethics of assisted reproductive medicine: A comparative study of western secular and Islamic bioethics. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

  • Kamali, M.H. 2011. Maqasid al-Shari’ah and Ijtihad as instruments of civilisational renewal: A methodological perspective. Islam and Civilisational Renewal 2(2): 245–271.

  • Kasule, O.H. 2015. A medical perspective on preservation of human progeny. In Preservation of human progeny in the age of biotechnology, eidted by Dalam S.M. Saifuddeen, 45–56. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia.

  • Kayadibi, S. 2017. Principles of Islamic law: The methods of interpretation of the texts (Usul al-fiqh). Petaling Jaya: Islamic Book Trust.

  • Lane, N. 2006. Powerhouse of Disease. Nature 440(7084): 600–602.

  • Legge, M., and R. Fitzgerald. 2013. Numerical identity: The creation of tri-parental embryos to correct inherited mitochondrial disease. The New Zealand Medical Journal 126(1385): 71–75.

  • Lohrasbi, L. 2015. Babies to be created from three people. Islam Today 3(27): 38–41.

  • Mitalipov, S., and D. Wolf. 2014. Clinical and ethical implications of mitochondrial gene transfer. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 25(1): 5–7.

  • Murphy, G. 2002. Donor insemination: Finding your roots. The Lancet 360: 419.

  • Muslim World League Islamic Fiqh Council. 2007. Resolutions of Islamic Fiqh Council 19th Sessions. Makkah Mukarramah: Muslim World League Islamic Fiqh Council.

  • Mustafa D. 1995. Perkahwinan menurut Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors.

  • Nesbitt, V., C. Alston, E. Blakely, et al. 2014. A national perspective on prenatal testing for mitochondrial disease. European Journal of Human Genetics 22(11): 1255–1259.

  • Nisker, J. 2015. The latest thorn by any other name: Germ-line nuclear transfer in the name of “mitochondrial replacement”. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 37(9): 829–831.

  • Nordin, M.M.. 2012. An Islamic perspective of assisted reproductive technologies. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science 11(4): 252–257.

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2012. Novel techniques for the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: An ethical review. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

  • Omar, A.M. 2013. Kedudukan anak tak sah taraf: Dari aspek pandangan Syarak, nasab dan pewarisan serta kekeluargaan Islam. Paper presented at Kempen “Sah Nikah, Sah Nasab,” Bangi, Selangor.

  • Palacios-Gonzalez, C. 2016. Mitochondrial replacement techniques: Egg donation, genealogy and eugenics. Monash Bioethics Review 34(1): 37–51.

  • Palacios-Gonzalez, C., and M. de Jesus Medina-Arellano. 2017. Mitochondrial replacement techniques and Mexico’s rule of law: On the legality of the first maternal spindle transfer case. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 4(1): 50–69.

  • Pfeffer, G., K. Majamaa, D.M. Turnbull, D. Thorburn, and P.F. Chinnery. 2012. Treatment for mitochondrial disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4): 1–39.

  • Poulton, J., and L. Bindoff. 2008. Mitochondrial respiratory chain disorders. In Encyclopedia of life sciences, edited by J. Boeke, G. Borisy, N. Craig, et al., 126–133. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  • Raquib, A. 2015. Islamic ethics of technology. Kuala Lumpur: The Other Press.

  • Reardon, S. 2016. Reports of “three-parent babies” multiply. Salt Lake City: Nature Publishing Group. Diakses November 24, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20849.

  • Regalado, A. 2015. Engineering the perfect baby. MIT Technology Review. April 23. Diakses Disember 15, 2016. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535661/engineering-the-perfect-baby/.

  • Reinhardt, K., D. Dowling, and E. Morrow. 2013. Mitochondrial Replacement, Evolution, and the Clinic. Science 341: 1345–1346.

  • Richardson, J., L. Irving, L. Hyslop, et al. 2015. Concise reviews: Assisted reproductive technologies to prevent transmission of mitochondrial DNA disease. Stem Cells 33(3): 639–645.

  • Ridzwan A. 2004. Standard maslahah dan mafsadah dalam penentuan hukum Islam semasa di Malaysia. Thesis Ph.D. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

  • Rispler-Chaim, V. 2008. Contemporary muftis between bioethics and social reality: Selection of the sex of a fetus as paradigm. Journal of Religious Ethics 36(1): 53–76.

  • Saey, T. 2016. Risk identified in procedure for “three-parent babies.” ScienceNews 189(13): 8.

  • Saifuddeen, S.M., N.N.A. Rahman, N.M. Isa, and A. Baharuddin. 2014. Maqasid al-Shariah as a complementary framework to conventional bioethics. Science Engineering Ethics 20(2): 317–327.

  • Samuels, D., P.Wonnapinij, and P. Chinnery. 2013. Preventing the transmission of pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations: Can we achieve long-term benefits from germ-line gene transfer? Human Reproduction 28(3): 554–559.

  • Sato, M., and K. Sato. 2013. Maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA by diverse mechanisms to eliminate paternal mitochondrial DNA. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1979-1984.

  • Say, R.E., R.G. Whittaker, H.E. Turnbull, R. McFarland, R.W. Taylor, and D.M. Turnbull. 2011. Mitochondrial disease in pregnancy: A systematic review. Obstetric Medicine 4(3): 90–94.

  • Schaefer, A., R. Taylor, D. Turnbull, and P. Chinnery. 2004. The epidemiology of mitochondrial disorders—Past, present and future. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1659(2-3): 115–120.

  • Schaefer, G. Bradley, and J.N. Thompson Jr. 2014. Medical genetics: An integrated approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

  • Schon, E., S. DiMauro, and M. Hirano. 2012. Human mitochondrial DNA: Roles of inherited and somatic mutations. Nature Reviews Genetics 13(12): 878–890.

  • Serour, G. 2008. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 17(3): 34–38.

  • Shaltut, M. 2004. al-Fatawa. Kaherah: Dar al-Syuruq.

  • Sharma, H., D. Singh, A. Mahant, and S. Sohal. 2020. Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy: A review. Heliyon 6(9): e04643.

  • Stankovic, B. 2005. “It’s a designer baby!” – Opinions on regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. UCLA Journal of Law & Technology 3: 1–31.

  • Tachibana, M., P. Amato, M. Sparman, et al. 2013. Towards germline gene therapy of inherited mitochondrial diseases. Nature 493(7434): 627–631.

  • Tachibana, M., M. Sparman, H. Sritanaudomchai, et al. 2009. Mitochondrial gene replacement in primate offspring and embryonic stem cells. Nature 461(7262): 367–372.

  • Taylor, R., and D. Turnbull. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human disease. Nature Reviews Genetics 6(5): 389–402.

  • Thorburn, D. 2004. Mitochondrial disorders: Prevalence, myths and advances. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 27(3): 349–362.

  • Wallace, D., and D. Chalkia. 2013. Mitochondrial DNA genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 5(11): 1–47.

  • Yamada, M., V. Emmanuele, M. Sanchez-Quintero, et al. 2016. Genetic drift can compromise mitochondrial replacement by nuclear transfer in human oocytes. Cell Stem Cell 18(6): 749–754.

  • Zaydan, A.K. 2001. al-Wajiz fi Sharh al-Qawa’id al-Fiqhiyyah fi al-Shari’ah al-Islamiyyah. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.

  • Zhang, J., H. Liu, S. Luo, A. Chavez-Badiola, et al. 2016. First live birth using human oocytes reconstituted by spindle nuclear transfer for mitochondrial DNA mutation causing Leigh Syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 106(3): e375–e376.

  • Zhang, J., H. Liu, S. Luo, et al. 2017. Live birth derived from oocyte spindle transfer to prevent mitochondrial disease. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 34(4): 361–368.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul Halim Ibrahim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, A.H., Rahman, N.N.A. & Saifuddeen, S.M. Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy: An Islamic Perspective. Bioethical Inquiry 20, 485–495 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10279-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10279-y

Keywords

Navigation