Skip to main content
Log in

Social Media: The Unnamed Plaintiff

  • Recent Developments
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Hammond-Browning, N. 2017. When doctors and parents don’t agree: The story of Charlie Gard. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(4): 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okninski, M. 2016. Determining a child’s best interests when parents refuse medical treatment—CAHS v Kiszko & Anor [2016] FCWA. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(3): 364–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okninski, M., and B. Richards. 2016. Regulating “quack” medicine and decision-making for children re-visited. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(4): 467–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, 2017. Considering professional misconduct and best interests of a child (palliative orders). Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14(1): 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernadette J. Richards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richards, B.J. Social Media: The Unnamed Plaintiff. Bioethical Inquiry 15, 309–312 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9872-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9872-7

Keywords

Navigation