Abstract
In an aluminum reduction cell, crushed anode cover at room temperature is added onto the exposed bulk electrolyte surface around newly positioned anodes and is heated by high heat flux from this liquid electrolyte. Liquid electrolyte penetrates inside the porous anode cover. Solid cryolite and alumina crystallize from the liquid electrolyte due to the temperature gradient in the anode cover. A solidified crust forms at the bottom part of the anode cover during the heating up period. A thermochemical model which takes into account both the liquid electrolyte penetration and phase transformations has been developed to simulate the temperature evolution, chemical composition development, and liquid front penetration and content in the anode cover. The model is tested against experimental data obtained from industrial cells and laboratory experiments in this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G.V. Arkhipov, V.V. Pingin, and Y.A. Tretyakov: Light Metals, 2007, pp. 327–31.
J. N. Bruggeman: 6th Australasian Aluminium Smelting Technology Conference and Workshop, 1998, pp. 167–90.
X. Liu, M.P. Taylor, and S.F. George: Light Metals, 1992, pp. 489–94.
Q. Zhang, M.P. Taylor, J.J. Chen, D. Cotton, T. Groutzo, and X. Yang: Light Metal, 2013, vol. 5, pp. 673–80.
L.N. Less: Light Metal, 1976, vol. 2, pp. 315–29.
R. Oedegard, S. Roenning, S. Rolseth, and J. Thonstad: Light Metal, 1985, vol. 3, pp. 695–709.
T.J. Johnston and N.E. Richards: Light Metal, 1983, vol. 2, pp. 623–39.
A.J. Banjab, G. Meintjes, J. Blasques, M. Sadiq, A. Kumar, M.M. Al-Jallaf, A. Zarouni, and H.A.M. Al: Light Metal, 2012, vol. 4, pp. 587–90.
N.P. Østbø: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway, 2002.
PERRY A FOSTER, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 1975, vol. 58, pp. 288-291.
K. Grjotheim and C. Krohn: Aluminium Electrolysis: Fundamentals of the Hall–Heroult Process, International Publishers Service, Incorporated, 1982, p. 45.
H.W. Kerr, J. Cisse, and G.F. Bolling: Acta Metall. 1974, vol. 22, pp. 677–86.
YZ Chen, F Liu, GC Yang, N Liu, CL Yang and YH Zhou, Scr. Mater. 2007, vol. 57, pp. 779-782.
Douglas F Craig and Jesse J Brown, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 1980, vol. 63, pp. 254-261.
N.I. Anufrieva, Z.N. Balashova, L.S. Baranova, and V.N. Veretinskii: Tsvetn. Met. 1985, vol. 8, pp. 66–71.
David P Stinton and Jesse J Brown, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 1976, vol. 59, pp. 264-265.
V Danielik and J Gabčová, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2004, vol. 76, pp. 763-773.
Roger T Cassidy and JESSE J BROWN, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 1979, vol. 62, pp. 547-551.
M. Dupuis: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, 1998, p. 409.
J. Thonstad and A. Slattavik: Second Czech. Aluminum Symposium, 1972, pp 210–17.
A. Solheim, S. Rolseth and E. Skybakmoen, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1996, vol. 27, pp. 739-744.
Donald A. Nield and Adrian Bejan: Convection in Porous Media. (Springer, New York, 2013).
F.P. Incropera, T.L. Bergman, A.S. Lavine, and D.P. DeWitt: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, Wiley, New York, 1990
W. Haupin: JOM, 1991, vol. 43, pp. 28–29.
Yoshiyuki Endo, Da-Ren Chen and David YH Pui, Powder Technology 2002, vol. 124, pp. 119-126.
A.W. Neumann, R. David, and Y. Zuo: Applied Surface Thermodynamics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011.
M.W. Chase, Jr.: J. Phys. Chem., NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, American Chemical Society, 1998.
T Yokokawa and OJ Kleppa, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 1964, vol. 68, pp. 3246-3249.
H Schaper and LL Van Reijen, Thermochimica Acta 1984, vol. 77, pp. 383-393.
Phadungsak Rattanadecho, Journal of thermophysics and heat transfer 2004, vol. 18, pp. 87-93.
Yuwen Zhang, Piyasak Damronglerd and Mo Yang, Heat Transfer Engineering 2010, vol. 31, pp. 555-563.
O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor: The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill, London, 1977.
G. Dhatt and G. Touzot: Finite Element Method, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2012.
S.S. Quek and G.R. Liu: Finite Element Method: A Practical Course. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2003.
T. Eggen, S. Rolseth, and K. Rye: Light Metals 1992, vol. 2, pp. 495–502.
Jeffrey M McKenzie, Clifford I Voss and Donald I Siegel, Advances in water resources 2007, vol. 30, pp. 966-983.
K.A. Rye: University of Trondheim, NTH, Norway, 1992.
K. Rye, J. Thonstad, and X.L. Liu: Light Metals, 1995, vol. 2, pp. 441–49.
HL Toor and JM Marchello, AIChE Journal 1958, vol. 4, pp. 97-101.
Acknowledgments
The authors are deeply indebted to Dr. Ketil Rye for supplying the detailed measurement data from the synthetic crust experiments carried out at NTNU.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted July 28, 2014.
Appendices
Appendix
The equations listed in Section III include the temperature T L, the concentration Ø i , and the phase transformation rate m i . These equations are complicated, especially the conservation equations of energy. They can be more concrete and easy to be solved by finding out the mutual coupling relationships between these variables.
Equations [2], [3], and [4]give
Equation [31] is got from energy equations [16] and [17].
Substituting Eqs. [7], [8], and [30] in Eq. [31] gives Eq. [32].
According to definition of specific sensible heat capacity C and latent heat L i of solid/liquid phase transformation, Eq. [33] is got (ignoring the difference between T L and T S).
According to the mechanism of mass transfer between solid/liquid phases[39]
where ϕ * i is saturation concentration, K i is a coefficient between concentration difference and phase transformation rate, and K i < 10−6 in the case of high surface area S. Equations [35] and [36] are got by substituting Eqs. [30] and [34] in the Eqs. [2] and [3] (In the case of the porous crust with fine pore size, the effect of mass diffusion D in the liquid bath on the model result is likely to be insignificant. Thus, the mass diffusion might be neglected in the application of the model in this case)
The items with K i are negligible in Eqs. [35] and [36], thus
According to the phase diagram, the saturation concentration ϕ * i is function of the equilibrium temperature T M. For a certain temperature T M, the saturation concentration ϕ * i is determined.
The solution for above Eqs. [37] and [38] is
Define F L as
By assuming \( T_{\rm{L}} \approx T_{\rm{M}} \), giving
Define effective heat capacity C E as
Substituting C E, the energy equations are integrated as
Because the coefficient C E is determined by the temperature and the eutectic curve, the temperature and the concentration are strongly coupled through Eq. [44].
Nomenclature
Symbol | Definition | Value |
---|---|---|
Variables, properties, and physical constants used in Model | ||
C | Specific heat capacity (J/kg K) | |
Liquid electrolyte | 1880 | |
Solid cryolite | 1100 to 1660 | |
Solid alumina | 900 to 1260 | |
C E | Effective specific heat capacity (J/kg K) | 2 × 103 to 104 |
D | Diffusion coefficient (m2/s) | 10−8 |
e | Emissivity (m/s2) | 0.4 |
g | Gravity acceleration (m/s2) | 9.8 |
h C | Convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K) | 5 |
h f | Convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K) | 500 |
R | Effective capillary radius (m) | R = 2εL/S |
k eff | Effective thermal conductivity (W/mK) | |
Alumina-based crust | 0.4 to 0.8 | |
Alumina loose cover | 0.1 to 0.3 | |
Crushed bath crust | 1.0 to 1.5 | |
Crushed bath loose cover | 0.2 to 0.8 | |
K R | Reaction rate constant (L/min) | 0.05 |
L | Latent heat (J/kg) | |
Eutectic reaction | 7.56 × 105 | |
Chiolite melting | 5.12 × 105 | |
S | Surface area per unit volume (m2/m3) | |
Sandy alumina | 7.7 × 107 | |
ρ | True density (kg/m3) | |
Liquid electrolyte | 2100 | |
Solid cryolite | 2970 | |
Solid alumina | 3950 | |
ε | Volume fraction | |
Initial porosity of sandy alumina | 0.7 | |
µ | Viscosity of the liquid electrolyte (mPa s) | 2.3 |
σ | Stefan-Boltzmann constant (kg/s3 k4) | 5.67 × 10−8 |
γL | Surface tension of the liquid electrolyte (N m−1) | 0.1 |
θ | Contact angle between the liquid electrolyte and the solid | cosθ ≈ 1 |
Symbol | Definition |
---|---|
Other nomenclature | |
h | Height position in the anode cover/crust (m) |
h R | Effective radiative heat transfer coefficient (W/m2K) |
h V | Volumetric convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m3K) |
H | Enthalpy (J) |
J | Diffusion flux (kg/m2s) |
K h | Hydraulic conductivity(m/s) |
m | Phase transformation rate (kg/m3s) |
t | Time (s) |
T | Temperature (°C) |
p | Pressure (Pa) |
Q | Heat flux (w/m2) |
q | Volumetric heat generation rate (w/m3) |
q γα | Volumetric heat generation rate (w/m3) |
u | Superficial fluid velocity (m/s) |
x | Coordinate (m) |
Ø | Weight fraction in the liquid electrolyte |
Subscript | Definition |
---|---|
1,2,3,…8 | Alumina, cryolite, AlF3, chiolite, LiF, KF, MgF2, and CaF2 |
A | Air |
B | Bulk electrolyte |
C | Loose cover |
e | Liquid electrolyte front (eutactic reaction) |
L | Liquid electrolyte |
M | Interface between the liquid electrolyte and solid phase |
p | Chiolite melting |
S | Solid phase |
γ | Transition alumina |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Q., Taylor, M.P. & Chen, J.J.J. Computational Modeling of Thermochemical Evolution of Aluminum Smelter Crust. Metall Mater Trans B 46, 1520–1534 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0304-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0304-3