Skip to main content
Log in

Fluid Flow Characteristics and Porosity Behavior in Full Penetration Laser Welding of a Titanium Alloy

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a computational fluid mechanics model is developed for full penetration laser welding of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. This has been used to analyze possible porosity formation mechanisms, based on predictions of keyhole behavior and fluid flow characteristics in the weld pool. Numerical results show that when laser welding 3 mm thickness titanium alloy sheets with given laser beam focusing optics, keyhole depth oscillates before a full penetration keyhole is formed, but thereafter keyhole collapses are not predicted numerically. For lower power, lower speed welding, the fluid flow behind the keyhole is turbulent and unstable, and vortices are formed. Molten metal is predicted to flow away from the center plane of the weld pool, and leave a gap or void within the weld pool behind the keyhole. For higher power, higher speed welding, fluid flow is less turbulent, and such vortices are not formed. Corresponding experimental results show that porosity was absent in the melt runs made at higher power and higher welding speed. In contrast, large pores were present in melt runs made at lower power and lower welding speed. Based on the combination of experimental results and numerical predictions, it is proposed that porosity formation when keyhole laser welding may result from turbulent fluid flow behind the keyhole, with the larger the value of associated Reynolds number, the higher the possibility of porosity formation. For such fluid flow controlled porosities, measures to decrease Reynolds number of the fluid flow close to the keyhole could prove effective in reducing or avoiding porosity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swift-Hook D T, Gick A E F, 1973: Penetration welding with lasers. Welding Journal, 52(11): 492s-499s.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews J G and Atthey D R, 1976: Hydrodynamic limit to penetration of a material by a high-power beam. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 9, 2181-2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klemens P G, 1976: Heat balance and flow conditions for electron beam and laser welding. J. of Applied Physics, 47: 2165-2174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cline H E, Anthony T R, 1977: Heat treating and melting material with a scanning laser or electron beam. J. of Applied Physics, 48(9): 3895-3900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazumder J and Steen W M, 1980: Heat transfer model for cw laser material processing, J. of Applied Physics, 51(2): 941-947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis M, Kapadia P, Dowden J, 1986: Modelling the fluid flow in laser beam welding. Welding Journal, 65(7): 167-172.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dowden J, Postacioglu N, Davis M, and Kapadia P, 1987: A keyhole model in penetration welding with a laser. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 20, 36-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steen W M, Dowden J, Davis M and Kapadia P, 1988: A point and line source model of laser keyhole welding. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 21:1255-1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Postacioglu N, Kapadia P and Dowden J, 1991: A theoretical model of thermocapillary flows in laser welding, J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 24(1): 15-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Mazumder, M.M. Chen, C.L. Chan, D. Voelkel, and R. Zehr: Proc. of Symposium on Joining of Materials for 2000 AD, 1991, 693–708.

  11. Mundra K, DebRoy T, Zacharia T and David S A, 1992: Role of thermophysical properties in weld pool modelling. Welding Journal, 71(9): 313s-320s.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kroos J, Gratzke U and Simon G, 1993: Towards a self-consistent model of the keyhole in penetration laser beam welding. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 26: 474-480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Metzbower E A, 1993: Keyhole formation. Metallurgical Transactions B, 24(5), 875-880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sudnik W, Radaj D and Erofeew W, 1996: Computerized simulation of laser beam welding, modelling and verification. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 29: 2811–2817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Semak V V, Damkroger B and Kempka S, 1999: Temporal evolution of the temperature field in the beam interaction zone during laser material processing. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 32, 1819-1825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao H, DebRoy T, 2003: Macroporosity free aluminium alloy weldments through numerical simulation of keyhole mode laser welding. J. of Applied Physics, 93(12): 10089-10096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin X, Li L and Zhang Y, 2002: A study on Fresnel absorption and reflections in the keyhole in deep penetration laser welding. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 35(18): 2304–2310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin X, Berger P and Graf T, 2006: Multiple reflections and Fresnel absorption in an actual 3D keyhole during deep penetration laser welding. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 39(21): 4703-4712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho J H and Na S J, 2006: Implementation of real-time multiple reflection and Fresnel absorption of laser beam in keyhole. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 39(24): 5372-5378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Rai and T. DebRoy: J. Phys. D, 2006, 39(6), pp. 1257–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Ki, P.S. Mohanty, and J. Mazumder: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2002, vol. 33A, pp. 1817–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Ki, P.S. Mohanty, and J. Mazumder: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2002, vol. 33, pp. 1831–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou J, Tsai H L and Wang P C, 2006: Transport phenomena and keyhole dynamics during pulsed laser welding. ASME J. of Heat Transfer, 128(7): 680-690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou J and Tsai H L, 2006: Investigation of transport phenomena and defect formation in pulsed laser keyhole welding of zinc-coated steels. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 39(24): 5338-5355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou J and Tsai H L, 2007: Porosity formation and prevention in pulsed laser welding. ASME J. of Heat Transfer, 129(8): 1014-1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou J and Tsai H L, 2007: Effects of electromagnetic force on melt flow and porosity prevention in pulsed laser keyhole welding. International J. of Heat and Mass Transfer, 50(11-12): 2217-2235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pang S, Chen L, Zhou J, Yin Y, Chen T, 2011: A three-dimensional sharp interface model for self-consistent keyhole and molten pool dynamics in deep penetration laser welding. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 44(2): 025301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H.Y. Zhao, W.C. Niu, B. Zhang, Y.P. Lei, M. Kodama, T. Ishide: J. Phys. D, 2011, vol. 44 (48), p. 485302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang W H, Zhou J, Tsai H L, 2003: Numerical modelling of keyhole dynamics in laser welding. Proc. of SPIE, Vol.4831, 180-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amara E H and Fabbro R, 2008: Modelling of gas jet effect on the molten pool movements during deep penetration laser welding. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 41(5), 055503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L J, Zhang J X, Zhang G F, Bo W, Gong SL, 2011: An investigation on the effects of side assisting gas flow and metallic vapour jet on the stability of keyhole and molten pool during laser full-penetration welding. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 44(13), 135201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsukamoto S, 2011: High speed imaging technique part 2 – high speed imaging of power beam welding phenomena. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2011, 16(1): 44-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Katayama, S. Kohsaka, M. Mizutani, K. Nishizawa, and A. Matsunawa: Proceedings of ICALEO, 1993, pp. 487–97.

  34. S. Katayama, N. Seto, M. Mizutani, and A. Matsunawa: Proceedings of ICALEO, Section C, 2000, pp. 16–25.

  35. Katayama S, Mizutani M and Matsunawa A, 2003: Development of porosity prevention procedures during laser welding. Proc. SPIE, 4831, 281-288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matsunawa A, Kim J, Seto N, Mizutani M, S Katayama, 1998: Dynamics of keyhole and molten pool in laser welding, J. of Laser Applications, 10(6): 247-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Matsunawa A, Kim J, Seto N, Mizutani M, S Katayama, 2000: Dynamics of keyhole and molten pool in high power CO2 laser welding, Proc. SPIE, 3888: 34-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Matsunawa A, Kim J, Seto N, Mizutani M, S Katayama, 2001: Observation of keyhole and molten pool in high power laser welding mechanism of porosity formation and its suppression method, Trans. JWRI, 30: 13-27.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Matsunawa A and Katayama S, 2003: Understanding physical mechanisms in laser welding for construction of mathematical model. Welding Research Abroad, 49 (4): 27-38.

    Google Scholar 

  40. N. Seto, S. Katayama, and A. Matsunawa: Proceedings of ICALEO, Section E, 1999, pp. 19–27.

  41. Seto N, Katayama S and Matsunawa A, 2000: Porosity formation mechanism and suppression procedure in laser welding of aluminium alloy. Q. J. Japan Weld. Soc. 18, 243-255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Seto N, Katayamat S, Mizutan M and Matsunawa A, 2000: Relationship between plasma and keyhole behaviour during CO2 laser welding, Proc. SPIE, 3888, 61-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Seto N, Katayama S and Matsunawa A, 2001: Porosity formation mechanism and reduction method in CO2 laser welding of stainless steel. Q. J. Japan Weld. Soc., 19, 600-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Tsukamoto, I. Kawaguchi, G. Arakane, and H. Honda: Int. Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics (ICALEO), Jacksonville, FL, 2001, pp. 400–08.

  45. I. Kawaguchi, S. Tsukamoto, H. Honda, and G. Arakane: International Congress on Applications of Lasers& Electro-Optics (ICALEO), Laser Institute of America, Section A, Orlando, FL, 2003, vol. 1006, pp. 168–75.

  46. J.E. Blackburn and C.M. Allen: “Modulated Twin Spot and High Beam Quality Laser Welding of Titanium Alloys”, TWI Industrial Member Report, No. 967, 2010.

  47. Kaplan A, Mizutani M, Katayama S, Matsunawa A, 2002: Unbounded keyhole collapse and bubble formation during pulsed laser interaction with liquid zinc. J. of Physics D: Applied Physics, 35(11): 1218-1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. J.E. Blackburn: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester, 2011.

  49. Hughes WF and Brighton JA, 1999: Schaum’s outline of fluid dynamics, USA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship with the 7th European Community Framework Programme (Grant Nos. 253487; 919487), whose financial support is gratefully appreciated. Thanks also go to Mathew Spinks and Paul Fenwick of TWI Ltd for performing the welding trials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baohua Chang.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted March 13, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, B., Allen, C., Blackburn, J. et al. Fluid Flow Characteristics and Porosity Behavior in Full Penetration Laser Welding of a Titanium Alloy. Metall Mater Trans B 46, 906–918 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-014-0242-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-014-0242-5

Keywords

Navigation