Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructure Size Control through Cooling Rate in Thermoelectric PbTe-Sb2Te3 Composites

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microstructures of alloys with three compositions in the pseudobinary PbTe-Sb2Te3 system cast in copper molds using the injection molding technique were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectrometry, and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The microstructural length scales such as interlamellar spacing (ILS) and secondary dendrite arm spacing vary over two orders of magnitude, e.g., from 0.2 to 20 μm for SDAS in the hypereutectic alloy, depending on injection pressure, distance from surface, or thickness. The decrease in the microstructural length scale with the decrease in distance from the surface, thickness, and increase in injection pressure is attributed to an increase in the cooling rates estimated using the heat-transfer theory in solids. The difference in the injection pressures is represented as the difference in the heat-transfer coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. JEOL is a trademark of Japan Electron Optics Ltd., Tokyo.

  2. PHILIPS is a trademark of FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR.

  3. Quotation marks are used for “Pb2Sb6Te11” throughout this manuscript, because the crystal structure is a seven-layer structure suggested to be PbSb2Te4 by Shelimova et al.,[16] while the chemical composition is much closer to the designation Pb2Sb6Te11 used since Abrikosov et al.[13]

  4. The regression lines for SDAS for alloy 3 and ILS for alloy 1 were determined because sampling numbers in the image analysis are larger for these alloys than for alloy 2 and, hence, the data for these alloys are supposed to be of better quality.

References

  1. L.E. Bell: Science, 2008, vol. 321, pp. 1457–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. C.B. Vining: Nat. Mater., 2009, vol. 8, pp. 83–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Venkatasubramanian, E. Siivola, T. Colpitts, and B. O’Quinn: Nature, 2001, vol. 413, pp. 597–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. T.C. Harman, P.J. Taylor, M.P. Walsh, and B.E. LaForge: Science, 2002, vol. 297, pp. 2229–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Chen: 9th Intersoc. Conf. on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena In Electronic Systems, IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37543, 2004, p. 8.

  6. K.F. Hsu, S. Loo, F. Guo, W. Chen, J.S. Dyck, C. Uher, T. Hogan, E.K. Polychroniadis, and M.G. Kanatzidis: Science, 2004, vol. 303, pp. 818–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D.L. Medlin and G.J. Snyder: Curr. Opin. Coll. Int. Sci., 2009, vol. 14 (4), pp. 226–35.

  8. T. Ikeda, S.M. Haile, V.A. Ravi, H. Azizgolshani, F. Gascoin, and G.J. Snyder: Acta Mater., 2007, vol. 55, pp. 1227–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Ikeda, L.A. Collins, V.A. Ravi, F.S. Gascoin, S.M. Haile, and G.J. Snyder: Chem. Mater., 2007, vol. 19, pp. 763–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Ikeda, V.A. Ravi, L.A. Collins, S.M. Haile, and G.J. Snyder: J. Electron. Mater., 2007, vol. 37, pp. 716–20.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Ikeda, V.A. Ravi, and G.J. Snyder: Acta Mater., 2009, vol. 57, pp. 666–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Ikeda, E.S. Toberer, V.A. Ravi, S.M. Haile, and G.J. Snyder: 26th Int. Conf. on Thermoelectrics, 2007.

  13. N.K. Abrikosov, E.I. Elagina, and M.A. Popova: Inorg. Mater., 1965, vol. 1, pp. 1944–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Ikeda, V.A. Ravi, and G.J. Snyder: unpublished research.

  15. P.E.J. Flewitt and R.K. Wild: Physical Methods for Materials Characterization, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, United Kingdom, 1994, p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L.E. Shelimova, O.G. Karpinskii, T.E. Svechnikova, E.S. Avilov, M.A. Kretova, and V.S. Zemskov: Inorg. Mater., 2004, vol. 40, pp. 1264–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. H.S. Carslaw, and J.C. Jaeger: Conduction of Heat in Solids, Clarendon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1959, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.R. Poirier and E.J. Poirier: Heat Transfer Fundamentals, 1992, TMS, Warrendale, PA, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Niiyama: Chuuzou Dennetsu Kougaku, Agne Gijutu Center, 2001, p. 210.

  20. D. Bouchard and J.S. Kirkaldy: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1997, vol. 28B, pp. 651–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Chalmers: Principle of Solidification, 1964, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Pasadena, CA) and the Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO) program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (Tokyo).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teruyuki Ikeda.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted July 6, 2009.

Appendix

Appendix

Figures A1 and A2 show the temperature variations with position and time, respectively, in a 3-mm-thick plate of a PbTe-Sb2Te3 alloy calculated for h = 500 and 60,000 Wm−2 K−1. Other physical quantities necessary in calculation were the same as those used in previous work.[8] The temperature gradient in the plate is steeper for h = 60,000 Wm−2 K−1 than for h = 500 Wm−2 K−1, as shown in Figure A1. Figure A2 shows that temperature decreases more rapidly with time for h = 60,000 Wm−2 K−1. Figure A2 also shows the cooling rates at the middle and at 10 and 100 μm from the surface in the plate. The cooling rates are higher in the initial stages of cooling and at positions closer to sample surface, reaching to the order of 106 Ks−1 for h = 60,000 Wm−2 K−1.

Fig. A1
figure 9

Temperature as a function of distance from the middle in a 3-mm-thick plate of a PbTe-Sb2Te3 alloy calculated using Eqs. [1a] through [1c] with the materials parameters used in previous work[8] for cases in which heat-transfer coefficients are h = (a) 500 Wm−2 K−1 and (b) 60,000 Wm−2 K−1

Fig. A2
figure 10

Temperature and cooling rate variation with time in a 3-mm-thick plate of a PbTe-Sb2Te3 alloy calculated using Eqs. [1a] through [1c] with the materials parameters used in previous work[8] for cases in which heat-transfer coefficients are h = (a) 500 Wm−2 K−1 and (b) 60,000 Wm−2 K−1. For distances in the figures, 10 μm (dotted line) and 100 μm (broken line), indicate distance from the surface

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ikeda, T., Ravi, V.A. & Jeffrey Snyder, G. Microstructure Size Control through Cooling Rate in Thermoelectric PbTe-Sb2Te3 Composites. Metall Mater Trans A 41, 641–650 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-0143-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-0143-4

Keywords

Navigation