Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Analysis and Structural Optimization of Torsional Flow Heat Exchangers with Sinusoidal Corrugated Baffle

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The thermal performance of the heat exchanger is strongly influenced by the supporting structure. Corrugated baffle enhances flow field disturbance and heat transfer through its complex and changeable flow channel. In order to enhance the thermal performance of the torsional flow heat exchanger (TFHX), the sinusoidal corrugated baffle (SCB) is used to replace the flat baffle (FB) and the full-section cycle model of the torsional flow heat exchanger with sinusoidal corrugated baffle (TFHX-SCB) is established. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method was used to discuss the flow resistance characteristics of the shell-side of heat exchangers. The results show that the SCB can improve the turbulence intensity and the uniformity of the flow field between the adjacent baffles. The combination of structural configurations on the shell-side of TFHX-SCB is analyzed by the central composite design (CCD)-response surface method (RSM). When the amplitude of the SCB is 1.37 mm, the cycles of the SCB are 4.42; the initial phase of the SCB is 112.73°, and the combination of heat transfer coefficient and comprehensive performance is optimal. Compared with the original structure, the heat transfer coefficient is increased by 11.58%, and the comprehensive performance is increased by 5.48%. The laser doppler velocimetry (LDV) experimental device irradiated the specified measurement point, and the dependability and accuracy of numerical simulation methods were verified. The research conclusion provides a basic theory for the structural development of the TFHX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

amplitude of the SCB/mm

A 0 :

heat exchange surface area/m2

A min :

minimum flow cross-sectional area/m2

B :

period length of the baffle/mm

D :

shell inner diameter/mm

D s :

diameter of pipe laying circle/mm

d 0 :

outer diameter of tube/mm

d e :

equivalent diameter/mm

f :

friction factor

h :

heat transfer coefficient/W·m−2·K−1

l :

length of tube/mm

M :

mass flow rate/kg·s−1

Nu :

Nusselt number

P t :

tube pitch/mm

p :

pressure/Pa

Δp :

pressure drop/Pa

PEC:

performance evaluation criterion

Q :

heat transfer rate/W

T :

fluid temperature/K

ΔT m :

log-mean temperature difference/K

u :

average flow rate of the shell-side/m·s−1

u s :

characteristic velocity/m·s−1

W :

baffle width/mm

β :

angle of baffle/(°)

δ :

baffle thickness/mm

θ :

initial phase/(°)

λ :

fluid thermal conductivity/W·m−1 K−1

ν :

kinematic viscosity

ρ :

fluid density/kg·m−3

in:

inlet

max:

maximum

min:

minimum

out:

outlet

CCD:

central composite design

CFD:

computational fluid dynamic

FB:

flat baffle

LDV:

laser doppler velocimetry

RSM:

response surface method

SCB:

sinusoidal corrugated baffle

STHXs:

shell-and-tube heat exchangers

TFHX:

torsional flow heat exchanger

TFHX-SCB:

torsional flow heat exchanger with sinusoidal corrugated baffle

References

  1. Chen Y.W., Wong C.W.Y., Yang R., et al., Optimal structure adjustment strategy, emission reduction potential and utilization efficiency of fossil energies in china. Energy, 2021, 237: 121623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Z.H., Zhao X.X., Kwon Y.C., Experimental study on heat transfer performance of white smoke reduction heat exchange system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 446: 022043.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meng M., Fu Y.A., Wang X.F., Decoupling, decomposition and forecasting analysis of china’s fossil energy consumption from industrial output. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 177: 752–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu X., Zheng Z.Y., Xiong X.C., et al., Heat transfer and flow resistance characteristics of helical baffle heat exchangers with twisted oval tube. Journal of Thermal Science, 2022, 31: 370–378.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Q.W., Chen G.D., Chen Q.Y., et al., Review of improvements on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with helical baffles. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2010, 31: 836–853.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu X., Zheng Z., Xiong X., et al., Characteristics of fluid flow and heat transfer in the shell side of the trapezoidal-like tilted baffles heat exchanger heat transfer engineering. Journal of Thermal Science, 2018, 27: 602–610.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y.C., Zhao W.S., Wang P.F., et al., Thermal performance of elliptical fin-and-tube heat exchangers with vortex generator under various inclination angles. Journal of Thermal Science, 2021, 30: 257–270.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gu X., Fang Y.G., Wang C.P., et al., Identification of fully developed regions and experimental investigation of twisted flow heat exchanger. Heat Transfer Research, 2020, 51: 1636–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fugmann H., Laurenz E., Schnabel L., Wire structure heat exchangers-new designs for efficient heat transfer. Energies, 2017, 10: 1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y.S., Liu Z.C., Huang S.Y., et al., Experimental investigation of shell-and-tube heat exchanger with a new type of baffles. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2011, 47: 833–839.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu X., Wang T.T., Chen W.J., et al., Multi-objective optimization on structural parameters of torsional flow heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 161: 113831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hao J.H., Chen Q., Li X., et al., A correction factor-based general thermal resistance formula for heat exchanger design and performance analysis. Journal of Thermal Science, 2021, 30: 892–901.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lutcha J., Nemcansky J., Performance improvement of tubular heat-exchangers by helical baffles. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1990, 68: 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ma L., Wang K., Liu M. et al., Numerical study on performances of shell-side in trefoil-hole and quatrefoil-hole baffle heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 123: 1444–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. El Maakoul A., Laknizi A., Saadeddine S., et al., Numerical comparison of shell-side performance for shell and tube heat exchangers with trefoil-hole, helical and segmental baffles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 109: 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan T.S., Khan M.S., Chyu M.-C., et al., Review of heat transfer and pressure drop correlations for evaporation of fluid flow in plate heat exchangers (rp-1352). Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 2009, 15: 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu C., Zhang L., Xu Y.K., et al., CFD study on the radial distribution of coolants in the inlet section of rod-baffle-multi-tubular reactor. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 34: 651–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang K., Liu J.Q., Liu Z.C., et al., Fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics investigation in the shell side of the branch baffle heat exchanger. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 14: 1775–1786.

    Google Scholar 

  19. You Y., Fan A., Huang S., et al., Numerical modeling and experimental validation of heat transfer and flow resistance on the shell side of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger with flower baffles. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55: 7561–7569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kral D., Stehlik P., Van D.P.H.J., et al., Helical baffles in shell-and-tube heat exchangers, Part i: Experimental verification. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1996, 17: 93–101.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jian W., Huizhu Y., Wang S., et al., Numerical investigation on baffle configuration improvement of the heat exchanger with helical baffles. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. You Y., Fan A., Lai X., et al., Experimental and numerical investigations of shell-side thermo-hydraulic performances for shell-and-tube heat exchanger with trefoil-hole baffles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 50: 950–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu X., Liu B., Wang Y.Q., et al., Heat transfer and flow resistance performance of shutter baffle heat exchanger with triangle tube layout in shell side. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 8: 1687814016641015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gu X., Chen W.J., Fang Y.G., et al., Analysis of flow dead zone in shell side of a heat exchanger with torsional flow in shell side. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 180: 115792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benzenine H., Saim R., Abboudi S., et al., Numerical study on turbulent flow forced-convection heat transfer for air in a channel with waved fins. Mechanika, 2013, 2: 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boonloi A., Jedsadaratanachai W., CFD analysis on heat transfer characteristics and fluid flow structure in a square duct with modified wavy baffles. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2022, 29: 101660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harikrishnan S., Tiwari S., Heat transfer characteristics of sinusoidal wavy channel with secondary corrugations. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2019, 145: 105973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang J., Ma L., Bock J., et al., A comparison of four numerical modeling approaches for enhanced shell-and-tube heat exchangers with experimental validation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 65: 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang Z., Li Z.Y., Yu G.L., et al., Numerical investigations on fully-developed mixed turbulent convection in dimpled parabolic trough receiver tubes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 114: 1287–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gu X., Wang G., Zhang Q.X., et al., Fluid-structure interaction analysis of heat exchanger with torsional flow in the shell side. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2022, 36: 479–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li E.B., Tieu A.K., Yuen W.Y.D., Measurements of velocity distributions in the deformation zone in cold rolling by a scanning LDV. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2001, 35: 41–49.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. He Y.L., Tang S.Z., Tao W.Q., et al., A general and rapid method for performance evaluation of enhanced heat transfer techniques. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 145: 118780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Box G.E.P., Wilson K.B., On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1951, 13: 1–38. DOI: 10.111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Han H.Z., Li B.X., Shao W., Multi-objective optimization of outward convex corrugated tubes using response surface methodology. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 70: 250–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21776263).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, X., Shi, Q., Gao, W. et al. Performance Analysis and Structural Optimization of Torsional Flow Heat Exchangers with Sinusoidal Corrugated Baffle. J. Therm. Sci. 32, 680–691 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-023-1773-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-023-1773-3

Keywords

Navigation