Abstract
This article, for the Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie, focuses on a study that used collaborative qualitative research methodology; namely the Co-operative Inquiry Cycle (1988). Co-operative Inquiry Cycle (CI) aimed to identify the ways in which psychodramatists worked with people who were survivors of sexual abuse and how they ensured that the protagonist experience was healing rather than harmful and re-traumatising. This study comprised of four senior psychodrama trainers/practitioners, who acted as co-researchers and co-subjects for two cycles. The texts were collected through semi-structured interview, audio-taped and transcribed; once analysed any questions unanswered or issues that were unclear formed the basis of the second cycle of inquiry. Analysing qualitative text presents challenges to new practitioner researchers, so there is an emphasis on how to do this, using material from the study and how to present the results in coherent ways.
Zusammenfassung
Dieser Artikel für die Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie konzentriert sich auf eine Studie, die kollaborative qualitative Forschungsmethoden verwendet, nämlich den Co-operative Inquiry Cycle (1988). Dieser zielt darauf ab, herauszufinden, wie PsychodramatikerInnen mit Menschen zusammenarbeiteten, die sexuellen Missbrauch überlebt hatten, und wie sie sicherstellten, dass die Erfahrung der ProtagonistInnen eher heilt als schädlich und re-traumatisierend wirkt. Diese Studie bestand aus vier erfahrenen Psychodrama-TrainerInnen/PraktikerInnen, die zwei Zyklen lang als Co-ForscherInnen und Co-ProbandInnen fungierten. Die Texte wurden durch semi-strukturierte Interviews erhoben, aufgezeichnet und transkribiert. Nach der Analyse wurden alle unbeantworteten oder unklaren Fragen als Grundlage für den zweiten Untersuchungszyklus verwendet. Die Analyse von qualitativem Text stellt ungeübte ForscherInnen vor Herausforderungen. Daher liegt der Schwerpunkt darauf, das Vorgehen zu veranschaulichen, indem Material aus der Studie verwendet wird. Dabei werden die Ergebnisse auf kohärente Weise dargestellt.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Moreno’s (1939) description of psychodramatic shock was related to working with patients with psychosis. When the lucid patient was stimulated in some way, this would act as a catalyst to ‘throw’ the patient “back into the psychotic world. This upsetting experience is called ‘psychodramatic shock’.” (p. 1).
References
Berring, L. L., Hummelvoll, J. K., Pedersen, L., & Buus, N. (2016). A co-operative inquiry into generating, describing, and transforming knowledge about de-escalation practices in mental health settings. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 37(7), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2016.1154628 Published online: 12 Apr 2016.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), Research designs. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1347976.pdf.
Bravette, G. (1997). Towards Bicultural competence: researching for personal and professional transformation. PhD thesis. University of Bath, UK: Centre for the Study of Organizational Change and Development.
Butler-Kisber, L., Allnutt, S., Furlini, L., Kronish, N., Markus, P., Poldma, T., & Stewart, M. (2003). Insight and voice: artful analysis in co-operative inquiry. The Journal of the Arts and Learning, 19(1), 127–166. Special Interest Group of the American Education Research Association: Art and Learning Research 2002–2003.
Chu, J. A. (1988). Ten traps for therapists in the treatment of trauma survivors. Dissociation, 1(4), 24–32.
Chu, J. A. (1990). Dissociative symptoms in relation to childhood physical and sexual abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(7), 887–892.
Chu, J. A. (1992). The therapeutic roller coaster: dilemmas in the treatment of childhood abuse survivors. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 1(4), 351–370.
Crowther, S., Hall, J., Balabanoff, D., Baranowska, B., Kay, L., Menage, D., & Fry, J. (2020). Spirituality and childbirth: an international virtual co-operative inquiry. Women and Birth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.004.
Elliot, R., & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology (pp. 147–159). Oxford: OUP.
Fallot, R. D., & Harris, M. (2008). Trauma-informed services. In G. Reyes, J. D. Elhai & J. D. Ford (Eds.), The encyclopaedia of psychological trauma (pp. 660–662). Hoboken: Wiley.
Herman, J. (1992b). Complex PTSD: a syndrome in survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma. Joumal of Traumatic Stress, 5(3), 377–391.
Herman, J. L. (1992a). Trauma and recovery: from domestic abuse to political terror. London: Harper Collins.
Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: research into the human condition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1986). ‘Research with people. Person-centered Review, 4(1), 456–476.
Hills, M. D. (2001). Using co-operative inquiry to transform evaluation of nursing students’ clinical practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice (pp. 341–347). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Kirk, K. (2000). Co-operative inquiry in psychodrama research. British Journal of Psychodrama and Sociodrama, 15(1), 5–22.
McShane, R. (2018). Stabilisation work in complex trauma counselling: working effectively with trauma in healthcare settings. https://www.bacp.co.uk/media/2890/rixon-mcshane-presentation.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2020.
Meekums, B. (2000). Creative group therapy for women survivors of child sexual abuse: speaking the unspeakable. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Miller, A. (1987). The drama of being a child. London: Virago.
Moreno, J. L. (1939). Psychodramatic shock therapy a sociometric approach to the problem of mental disorders. Sociometry, 2(1), 1–30. Accessed 15th June 2020 http://www.psychodrama.gr/sitepics/PD%20MENTAL%20DISORDERS.pdf.
Reason, P. (Ed.). (1988). Human inquiry into action: developments in new paradigm research. London: SAGE.
Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (Eds.). (1981). Human inquiry: a sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester: Wiley.
Sanderson, C. (1995). Counselling adult survivors of child sexual abuse (2nd edn.). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Short, M. (2018). The co-operative inquiry research method: a lived experience. In M. Manohar, W. Bowles & K. Bell (Eds.), Social work: innovations and insights. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
Sinason, V. (1994). Treating survivors of satanist abuse. London: Routledge.
Sochacka, A. W., Walther, J., & Pawley, A. L. (2018). Ethical validation: reframing research ethics in engineering education research to improve research quality. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20222.
Traylen, H. (1994). Co-operative inquiry with health visitors. In P. Reason (Ed.), Participation in human inquiry (pp. 59–81). London: SAGE.
West, W. (1996). Using human inquiry groups in counselling research. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24(3), 347–355.
Whitaker, D. S., & Archer, J. L. (1989). Research by social workers: capitalising on experience. London: CCETSW.
Yalom, I. (1985). Theory and practice of group psychotherapy (3rd edn.). New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirk, K. Collaboration and co-operation: using the voices of colleagues in psychodrama research. Z Psychodrama Soziom 19 (Suppl 1), 191–209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11620-020-00571-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11620-020-00571-z
Keywords
- Psychodrama
- Co-operative Inquiry Cycle
- Human inquiry cycle
- Thematic analysis
- Working with sexual abuse
- Psychodrama directors