Literatur
Althaus, Scott L., 2003: Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alvarez, R. Michael/ Brehm, John, 1995: American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values, in: American Journal of Political Science 39, 1055–1082.
Alvarez, R. Michael/ Brehm, John, 1997: Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies, in: American Journal of Political Science 41, 345–374.
Alvarez, R. Michael/ Brehm, John, 1998: Speaking in Two Voices: American Equivocation about the Internal Renvue Service, in: American Journal of Political Science 42, 418–452.
Alvarez, R. Michael/ Brehm, John, 2002: Hard Choices, Easy Answers. Values, Information, and American Public Opinion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barker, David C./ Hansen, Susan B., 2005: All Things Considered: Systematic Cognitive Processing and Electoral Decision-Making, in: Journal of Politics 67, 319–344.
Bartels, Larry M., 2003: Democracy with Attitudes, in: MacKuen, Michael B./ Rabinowitz, George (Hg.), Electoral Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 48–82.
Basinger, Scott J./ Lavine, Howard, 2005: Ambivalence, Information, and Electoral Choice, in: American Political Science Review 99, 169–184.
Bassili, John N., 1995: On the Reality of Party Identification: Evidence from the Accessibility of Voting Intentions and of Partisan Feelings, in: Political Behavior 17, 339–358.
Bassili, John N./ Krosnick, Jon A., 2000: Do Strength-Related Attitude Properties Determine Suseptibility to Response Effects? New Evidence Using Response Latency, Attitude Extremity, Aggregate Indices, in: Political Psychology 21, 107–134.
Billiet, Jaak/ Swyngedouw, Marc/ Waege, Hans, 2004: Attitude Strength and Response Stability of a Quasi-Balanced Political Alienation Scale in a Panel Study, in: Saris, Willem E./ Sniderman, Paul M. (Hg.), Studies in Public Opinion. Attitudes, Non-attitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 268–292.
Bizer, George Y./ Visser, Penny S./ Berent, Matthew K./ Krosnick, Jon A., 2004: Importance, Knowledge, and Accessibility: Exploring the Dimensionality of Strength-Related Attitude Properties, in: Saris, Willem E./ Sniderman, Paul M. (Hg.), Studies in Public Opinion. Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 215–241.
Brady, Henry E./ Sniderman, Paul M., 1985: Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning, in: American Political Science Review 79, 1061–1078.
Campbell, Angus/ Converse, Philip E./ Miller, Warren E./ Stokes, Donald E., 1960: The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Campbell, Angus/ Gurin, Gerald/ Miller, Warren E., 1954: The Voter Decides. Evanston: Row, Peterson and Company.
Conover, Pamela Johnston/ Feldman, Stanley, 1991: Where is the Schema? Critiques, in: American Political Science Review 85, 1364–1369.
Converse, Philip E., 1964: The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics, in: Apter, David E. (Hg.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, 206–261.
Converse, Philip E., 1970: Attitudes and Non-Attitudes, in: Tufte, Edward R. (Hg.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 168–189.
Converse, Philip E., 1990: Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information, in: Ferejohn, John H./ Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 369–388.
Falter, Jürgen W./ Gabriel, Oscar W./ Weßels, Bernhard, 2005: Einleitung, in: Falter, Jürgen W./ Gabriel, Oscar W./ Weßels, Bernhard (Hg.), Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2002. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 9–12.
Festinger, Leon, 1957: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Fletcher, Joseph F., 2000: Two-Timing: Politics and Response Latencies in a Bilingual Survey, in: Political Psychology 21, 2755.-
Gabriel, Oscar W./ Keil, Silke I., 2005: Empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland: Kritik und Entwicklungsperspektiven, in: Falter, Jürgen W./ Schoen, Harald (Hg.), Handbuch Wahlforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 611–641.
Gamson, William A., 1992: Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gamson, William A./ Modigliani, Andrew, 1989: Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach, in: American Journal of Sociology 95, 1–37.
Heider, Fritz, 1958: The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
Huckfeldt, Robert/ Sprague, John, 2000: Political Consequences of Inconsistency: The Accessibility and Stability of Abortion Attitudes, in: Political Psychology 21, 57–79.
Jackman, Simon/ Sniderman, Paul M., 2002: Institutional Organization of Choice Spaces: A Political Conception of Political Psychology, in: Monroe, Kristen Renwick (Hg.), Political Psychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 209–224.
Krosnick, Jon A., 2002: Is Political Psychology Sufficiently Psychological? Distinguishing Political Psychology from Psychological Political Science, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Thinking about Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–216.
Krosnick, Jon A./ McGraw, Kathleen M., 2002: Psychological Political Science Versus Political Psychology True to Its Name: A Plea for Balance, in: Monroe, Kristen Renwick (Hg.), Political Psychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 79–94.
Kuklinski, James H./ Luskin, Robert C./ Bolland, John, 1991: Where Is the Schema? Going Beyond the ’s’ Word in Political Psychology, in: American Political Science Review 85, 1341–1356.
Kuklinski, James H./ Quirk, Paul J., 2000: Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion, in: Lupia, Arthur/ McCubbins, Mathew D./ Popkin, Samuel L. (Hg.), Elements of Reason. Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–182.
Lau, Richard R., 2003: Models of Decision-Making, in: Sears, David O./ Huddy, Leonie/ Jervis, Robert (Hg.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–59.
Lau, Richard R./ Redlawsk, David P., 1997: Voting Correctly, in: American Political Science Review 91, 585–599.
Lau, Richard R./ Redlawsk, David P., 2001a: Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making, in: American Journal of Political Science 45, 951–971.
Lau, Richard R./ Redlawsk, David P., 2001b: An Experimental Study of Information Search, Memory, and Decision Making During a Political Campaign, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Citizen and Politics. Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–159.
Lavine, Howard, 2001: The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence Toward Presidential Candidates, in: American Journal of Political Science 45, 915–929.
Lavine, Howard, 2002: On-Line Versus Memory-Based Process Models of Political Evaluation, in: Monroe, Kristen Renwick (Hg.), Political Psychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 225–247.
Lavine, Howard/ Borgida, Eugene/ Sullivan, John L., 2000: On the Relationship Between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing, in: Political Psychology 21, 81–106.
Lippmann, Walter, 1922: Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.
Lippmann, Walter, 1925: The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Lipset, Seymour M./ Rokkan, Stein, 1967: Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction, in: Lipset, Seymour M./ Rokkan, Stein (Hg.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1–64.
Lodge, Milton/ McGraw, Kathleen M., 1991: Where is the Schema? Critiques, in: American Political Science Review 85, 1357–1364.
Lodge, Milton/ McGraw, Kathleen/ Stroh, Patrick, 1989: An Impression-driven Model of Candidate Evaluation, in: American Political Science Review 83, 399–419.
Lodge, Milton/ Steenbergen, Marco R./ Brau, Shawn, 1995: The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation, in: American Political Science Review 89, 309–326.
Lodge, Milton/ Taber, Charles S., 2005: The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis, in: Political Psychology 26, 455–482.
Lodge, Milton/ Taber, Charles, 2000: Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning, in: Lupia, Arthur/ McCubbins, Mathew D./ Popkin, Samuel L. (Hg.), Elements of Reason. Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–213.
Luskin, Robert C., 2002: Political Psychology, Political Behavior, and Politics: Questions of Aggregation, Causal Distance, and Taste, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Thinking about Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–250.
Marcus, George E./ MacKuen, Michael B., 2001: Emotions and Politics: The Dynamic Functions of Emotionality, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Citizen and Politics. Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–67.
Marcus, George E./ Neuman, W. Russell/ MacKuen, Michael, 2000: Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Masters, Roger D., 2001: Cognitive Neuroscience, Emotion, and Leadership, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Citizen and Politics. Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 68–102.
McGraw, Kathleen M., 2000: Contributions of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology, in: Political Psychology 21, 805–832.
McGraw, Kathleen M./ Hasecke, Edward/ Conger, Kimberly, 2003: Ambivalence, Uncertainty, and Processes of Candidate Evaluation, in: Political Psychology 24, 421–448.
Miller, Joanne M./ Krosnick, Jon A., 2000: News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source, in: American Journal of Political Science 44, 295–309.
Miller, Joanne M./ Peterson, David A.M., 2004: Theoretical and Empirical Implications of Attitude Strength, in: Journal of Politics 66, 847–867.
Morris, James P./ Squires, Nancy K./ Taber, Charles S./ Lodge, Milton, 2003: Activation of Political Attitudes: A Psychophysiological Examination of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis, in: Political Psychology 24, 727–745.
Page, Benjamin I./ Shapiro, Robert Y., 1992: The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Redlawsk, David P., 2001: You Must Remember This: A Test of the On-Line Model of Voting, in: Journal of Politics 63, 29–58.
Redlawsk, David P., 2002: Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making, in: Journal of Politics 64, 1021–1044.
Redlawsk, David P., 2004: What Voters Do: Information Search During Election Campaigns, in: Political Psychology 25, 595–610.
Rosenberg, Shawn, 2002: Reconstructing Political Psychology: Current Obstacle and New Direction, in: Monroe, Kristen Renwick (Hg.), Political Psychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 329–365.
Saris, Willem E., 2004: Different Judgment Models for Policy Questions: Competing or Complementary?, in: Saris, Willem E./ Sniderman, Paul M. (Hg.), Studies in Public Opinion. Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 17–36.
Scherpenzeel, Annette C./ Saris, Willem E., 1997: The Validity and Reliability of Survey Questions: A Meta-analysis of MTMM Studies, in: Sociological Methods and Research 23, 341–383.
Sniderman, Paul M., 1993: The New Look in Public Opinion Research, in: Finifter, Ada (Hg.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 219–245.
Sniderman, Paul M., 2000: Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning, in: Lupia, Arthur/ McCubbins, Mathew D./ Popkin, Samuel L. (Hg.), Elements of Reason. Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 67–84.
Sniderman, Paul M./ Brody, Richard A./ Tetlock, Philip E., 1991: Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M./ Bullock, John, 2004: A Consistency Theory of Public Opinion and Political Choice: The Hypothesis of Menu Dependence, in: Saris, Willem E./ Sniderman, Paul M. (Hg.), Studies in Public Opinion. Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 337–357.
Sniderman, Paul M./ Fletcher, Joseph F./ Russell, Peter H./ Tetlock, Philip E., 1996: The Clash of Rights. Liberty, Equality, and Legitimacy in Pluralist Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M./ Tetlock, Philip E./ Elms, Laurel, 2001: Public Opinion and Democratic Politics: The Problem of Non-attitudes and the Social Construction of Political Judgment, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Citizen and Politics. Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 254–288.
Steenbergen, Marco R./ Lodge, Milton, 2003: Process Matters: Cognitive Models of Candidate Evaluation, in: MacKuen, Michael B./ Rabinowitz, George (Hg.), Electoral Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 125–171.
Sullivan, John L./ Rahn, Wendy M./ Rudolph, Thomas J., 2002: The Contours of Political Psychology: Situating Research on Political Information Processing, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Thinking about Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–47.
Taber, Charles S., 2003: Information Processing and Public Opinion, in: Sears, David O./ Huddy, Leonie/ Jervis, Robert (Hg.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 433–476.
Taber, Charles S./ Lodge, Milton/ Glathar, Jill, 2001: The Motivated Construction of Political Judgments, in: Kuklinski, James H. (Hg.), Citizen and Politics. Perspectives from Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198–226.
Tetlock, Philip E., 2000: Coping with Trade-Offs: Psychological Constraints and Political Implications, in: Lupia, Arthur/ McCubbins, Mathew D./ Popkin, Samuel L. (Hg.), Elements of Reason. Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 239–263.
Tversky, Amos/ Kahneman, Daniel, 1981: The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, in: Cognitive Psychology 5, 207–232.
Zaller, John R., 1992: The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, John R., 2003: Coming to Grips with V.O. Key’s Concept of Latent Opinion, in: MacKuen, Michael B./ Rabinowitz, George (Hg.), Electoral Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 311–336.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schoen, H. Der demokratische Musterbürger als Normalfall? Kognitionspsychologische Einblicke in die black box politischer Meinungsbildung. PVS 47, 89–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-006-0006-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-006-0006-1