Skip to main content
Log in

Stop Orders to Reduce Inappropriate Urinary Catheterization in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hospitalized patients frequently have urinary catheters inserted for inappropriate reasons. This can lead to urinary tract infections and other complications.

Objective

To assess whether stop orders for indwelling urinary catheters reduces the duration of inappropriate urinary catheterization and the incidence of urinary tract infections.

Design

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in three tertiary-care hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Patients with indwelling urinary catheters were randomized to prewritten orders for the removal of urinary catheters if specified criteria were not present or to usual care.

Participants

Six hundred ninety-two hospitalized patients admitted to hospital with indwelling urinary catheters inserted for ≤48 h.

Measurements

The main outcomes included days of inappropriate indwelling catheter use, total days of catheter use, frequency of urinary tract infection, and catheter reinsertions.

Results

There were fewer days of inappropriate and total urinary catheter use in the stop-order group than in the usual care group (difference −1.69 [95% CI −1.23 to −2.15], P < 0.001 and −1.34 days, [95% CI, −0.64 to −2.05 days], P < 0.001, respectively). Urinary tract infections occurred in 19.0% of the stop-order group and 20.2% of the usual care group, relative risk 0.94 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.33), P = 0.71. Catheter reinsertion occurred in 8.6% of the stop-order group and 7.0% in the usual care group, relative risk 1.23 (95% CI, 0.72 to 2.11), P = 0.45.

Conclusions

Stop orders for urinary catheterization safely reduced duration of inappropriate urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients but did not reduce urinary tract infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

References

  1. Topal J , Conklin S , Camp K , Morris V , Balcezak T , Herbert P. Prevention of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infections through computerized feedback to physicians and a nurse-directed protocol. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20:121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gokula RR , Hickner JA , Smith MA. Inappropriate use of urinary catheters in elderly patients at a midwestern community teaching hospital. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:196–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hazelett SE , Tsai M , Gareri M , Allen K. The association between indwelling urinary catheter use in the elderly and urinary tract infection in acute care. BMC Geriatr. 2006;6:15. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2318/6/15 (accessed March 21, 2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain P , Parada J , Annette D , Smith L. Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155131425–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Munasinghe RL , Yazdani H , Siddique M , Hafeez W. Appropriateness of use of indwelling urinary catheters in patients admitted to the medical service. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22:647–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardam MA , Amihod B , Orenstein P , Consolacion N , Miller MA. Overutilization of indwelling urinary catheters and the development of nosocomial urinary tract infections. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1998;6:99–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saint S , Wiese J , Amory JK , et al.. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med. 2000;109:476–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sedor J , Mulholland SG. Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections associated with the indwelling catheter. Urol Clin North Am. 1999;26:821–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saint S , Lipsky BA. Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: Should we? Can we? How? Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:800–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stamm WE. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention. Am J Med. 1991;91suppl 3B65S–71S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997;11:609–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Balows LE , eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1991.

  13. Garner JS , Jarvis WR , Emori TG , Horan TC , Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16:128–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility tests: sixth informational supplement M100-S6. Wayne: NCCLS; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haley RW , Hooton TM , Culver DH , et al. Nosocomial infections in US hospitals, 1975–1976: estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients. Am J Med. 1981;70:947–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garibaldi RA , Burke JP , Dickman ML , Smith CB. Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:215–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cornia PB , Amory JK , Fraser S , Saint S , Lipsky BA. Computer-based order entry decreases duration of indwelling urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients. Am J Med. 2003;114:404–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saint S , Kaufman SR , Thompson M , Rogers MA , Chenoweth CE. A reminder reduces urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:455–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang WC , Wann SR , Lin SL , et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units can be reduced by prompting physicians to remove unnecessary catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:974–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saint S , Lipsky BA , Goold SD. Indwelling urinary catheters: a one-point restraint? Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:125–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tambyah PA , Maki DG. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1,497 catheterized patients. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:678–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Physician’s Services Incorporated Foundation of Ontario.

Potential Financial Conflicts of interest:

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Loeb MD, MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loeb, M., Hunt, D., O’Halloran, K. et al. Stop Orders to Reduce Inappropriate Urinary Catheterization in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 816–820 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0620-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0620-2

KEY WORDS

Navigation