Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatocyte transporter expression in FNH and FNH-like nodule: correlation with signal intensity on gadoxetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our aim was to evaluate the hepatocyte transporters in focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and FNH-like lesions and to correlate the grade of its expression with signal intensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HB phase) of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI).

Materials and methods

Thirteen histopathological confirmed cases including eight with EOB-MRI were studied. Immunohistochemical staining for transporter was performed and its grade semiquantitatively analyzed.

Results

Histopathologically, ten cases showed almost equal organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATP) 8 expression relative to the surrounding liver; the remaining three showed stronger OATP8 expression. In eight cases with EOB-MRI, two demonstrated more hyperintensity on the HB phase, and their OATP8 expression was stronger compared with the surrounding liver. The remaining six cases showed isointensity on the HB phase and revealed almost equal OATP8 expression. The expression of export transporter multi-drug-resistant proteins (MRP) 1 and 2 were almost equal relative to the surrounding liver in most cases (11/12, 92 %; 11/12, 92 %, respectively), whereas MRP3 focally overexpressed in 75 % (9/12) of cases.

Conclusion

FNH and FNH-like nodules revealed equal or stronger OATP8 expression than background liver. OATP8 expression showed significant correlation with signal intensity on the HB phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FNH:

Focal nodular hyperplasia

HB phase:

Hepatobiliary phase

EOB-MRI:

Gadoxetic-acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

OATP:

Organic anion transporter polypeptides

MRP:

Multi-drug-resistant proteins

Gd-EOB-DTPA:

Gadoxetic acid

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

NTCP:

Na+ taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide

References

  1. Vogl T, Kümmel S, Hammerstingl R, Schellenbeck M, Schumacher G, Balzer T, et al. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1996;200(1):59–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bluemke D, Sahani D, Amendola M, Balzer T, Breuer J, Brown JJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: U.S. multicenter phase III study. Radiology. 2005;237(1):89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W. Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(4):559–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Schmitt-Willich H, Press W, Negishi C, Weinmann H, Speck U. Preclinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a contrast agent in MR imaging of the hepatobiliary system. Radiology. 1992;183(1):59–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huppertz A, Haraida S, Kraus A, Zech CJ, Scheidler J, Breuer J, et al. Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT—initial observations. Radiology. 2005;234(2):468–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamm B, Staks T, Mühler A, Bollow M, Taupitz M, Frenzel T, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195(3):785–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reimer P, Rummeny E, Shamsi K, Balzer T, Daldrup HE, Tombach B, et al. Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology. 1996;199(1):177–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zech C, Grazioli L, Breuer J, Reiser M, Schoenberg S. Diagnostic performance and description of morphological features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of a multicenter trial. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(7):504–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vander Borght S, Libbrecht L, Blokzijl H, Faber KN, Moshage H, Aerts R, et al. Diagnostic and pathogenetic implications of the expression of hepatic transporters in focal lesions occurring in normal liver. J Pathol. 2005;207(4):471–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakanuma Y. Non-neoplastic nodular lesions in the liver. Pathol Int. 1995;45(10):703–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Terminology of Nodular Hepatocellular Lesions. International working party. Hepatology. 1995;22(3):983–93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bioulac-Sage P, Balabaud C, Bedossa P, Scoazec JY, Chiche L, Dhillon AP, et al. Pathological diagnosis of liver cell adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: Bordeaux update. J Hepatol. 2007;46(3):521–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugihara S, Nakashima O, Kiyomatsu K, Ijiri M, Edamitsu O, Kojiro M. A case of liver cirrhosis with a hyperplastic nodular lesion. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1990;40(9):699–703.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Terada T, Kitani S, Ueda K, Nakanuma Y, Kitagawa K, Masuda S. Adenomatous hyperplasia of the liver resembling focal nodular hyperplasia in patients with chronic liver disease. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1993;422(3):247–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Quaglia A, Tibballs J, Grasso A, Prasad N, Nozza P, Davies SE, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia-like areas in cirrhosis. Histopathology. 2003;42(1):14–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. An H, Illei P, Diflo T, John D, Morgan G, Teperman L, et al. Scirrhous changes in dysplastic nodules do not indicate high-grade status. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18(6):660–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakashima O, Kurogi M, Yamaguchi R, Miyaaki H, Fujimoto M, Yano H, et al. Unique hypervascular nodules in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: identical to focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules? J Hepatol. 2004;41(6):992–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wanless I, Mawdsley C, Adams R. On the pathogenesis of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Hepatology. 1985;5(6):1194–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bioulac-Sage P, Balabaud C, Wanless I. Diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia: not so easy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(10):1322–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Welch T, Sheedy PF 2nd, Johnson C, Stephens DH, Charboneau JW, Brown ML, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: comparison of angiography, CT, US, and scintigraphy. Radiology. 1985;156(3):593–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlson S, Johnson C, Bender C, Welch T. CT of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(3):705–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brancatelli G, Federle M, Grazioli L, Blachar A, Peterson M, Thaete L. Focal nodular hyperplasia: CT findings with emphasis on multiphasic helical CT in 78 patients. Radiology. 2001;219(1):61–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyayama S, Matsui O, Ueda K, Kifune K, Yamashiro M, Yamamoto T, et al. Hemodynamics of small hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: evaluation with single-level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(6):1567–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Giovanoli O, Heim M, Terracciano L, Bongartz G, Ledermann HP. MRI of hepatic adenomatosis: initial observations with gadoxetic acid contrast agent in three patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(5):W290–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, Gabata T, Kobayashi S, Koda W, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging—correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology. 2010;256(3):817–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leonhardt M, Keiser M, Oswald S, Kühn J, Jia J, Grube M, et al. Hepatic uptake of the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA: role of human organic anion transporters. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(7):1024–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Narita M, Hatano E, Arizono S, Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Isoda H, Kitamura K, et al. Expression of OATP1B3 determines uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(7):793–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saito K, Kotake F, Ito N, Ozuki T, Mikami R, Abe K, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma: quantitative evaluation of tumor enhancement in hepatobiliary phase. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norihide Yoneda.

About this article

Cite this article

Yoneda, N., Matsui, O., Kitao, A. et al. Hepatocyte transporter expression in FNH and FNH-like nodule: correlation with signal intensity on gadoxetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance images. Jpn J Radiol 30, 499–508 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0085-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0085-4

Keywords

Navigation