Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in transverse images acquired from spine phased array coils is improved by deactivating coils distant from the imaging region and to identify the optimum coil settings.
Materials and methods
Ten healthy volunteers (five men, five women; average age 38 years) underwent transverse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine using four to one channels of a four-channel phased array coil for cervical imaging. The SNR of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), spinal cord, muscle tissue, intervertebral disc, vertebral body, and prevertebral soft tissue was measured for each coil combination.
Results
In all measured regions, the SNR was the highest for images acquired using two coils; the SNR was significantly higher for two coils than for four coils in CSF, spinal cord, muscle tissue, intervertebral disc, vertebral body, and prevertebral soft tissue (P < 0.001, P = 0.019, P < 0.0001, P = 0.014, P = 0.010, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Deactivating two of the four coils used for sagittal sections, meaning that two coils are active, resulted in improved SNR for transverse images. Selecting the optimum number and combination of coils for each imaging cross section may enable acquisition of images with a better SNR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 1990;16: 192–225.
Porter JR, Wright SM, Reykowski A. A 16-element phasedarray head coil. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:272–279.
Zhu Y, Hardy CJ, Sodickson DK, Giaquinto RO, Dumoulin CL, Kenwood G, et al. Highly parallel volumetric imaging with a 32-element RF coil array. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:869–877.
Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–962.
Hayes CE, Hattes N, Roemer PB. Volume imaging with MR phased arrays. Magn Reson Med 1991;18:309–319.
Requardt H, Offermann J, Erhard P. Switched array coils. Magn Reson Med 1990;13:385–397.
Fisher MR, Barker B, Amparo EG, Brandt G, Brant-Zawadzki M, Hricak H, et al. MR imaging using specialized coils. Radiology 1985;157:443–447.
Totterman S, Foster TH, Plewes DB, Simon JH, Ekholm S, Wicks A. Dual cervical thoracic coil for spine magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 1989;30:661–664.
Larsson EG, Erdogmus D, Yan R, Principe JC, Fitzsimmons JR. SNR-optimality of sum-of-squares reconstruction for phased-array magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson 2003;163:121–123.
Schubert T. Surface coil imaging. In: Stoller DW, editor. Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedics and sports medicine. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 29–40.
Erdogmus D, Yan R, Larsson EG, Principe JC, Fitzsimmons JR. Image construction methods for phased array magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:306–314.
Kramer H, Zenge M, Schmitt P, Glaser C, Reiser MFH, Karin A. Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with continuous table movement at 3.0 T: initial experience compared with step-by-step MRA. Invest Radiol 2008;43: 627–634.
Charil A, Filippi M, Falini A. High-field strength MRI (3.0T or more) in white matter disease. In: Salvolini U, Scarabino T, editors. High field brain MRI. 1st edn. Berlin: Springer; 2006. p. 186–192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Moriya, S., Miki, Y., Yokobayashi, T. et al. Optimization of the number of selectable channels for spine phased array coils for transverse imaging. Jpn J Radiol 29, 166–170 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-010-0532-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-010-0532-z